Literature DB >> 24931401

Same task, different strategies: how brain networks can be influenced by memory strategy.

Lori Sanfratello1, Arvind Caprihan, Julia M Stephen, Janice E Knoefel, John C Adair, Clifford Qualls, S Laura Lundy, Cheryl J Aine.   

Abstract

Previous functional neuroimaging studies demonstrated that different neural networks underlie different types of cognitive processing by engaging participants in particular tasks, such as verbal or spatial working memory (WM) tasks. However, we report here that even when a WM task is defined as verbal or spatial, different types of memory strategies may be used to complete it, with concomitant variations in brain activity. We developed a questionnaire to characterize the type of strategy used by individual members in a group of 28 young healthy participants (18-25 years) during a spatial WM task. A cluster analysis was performed to differentiate groups. We acquired functional magnetoencephalography and structural diffusion tensor imaging measures to characterize the brain networks associated with the use of different strategies. We found two types of strategies were used during the spatial WM task, a visuospatial and a verbal strategy, and brain regions and time courses of activation differed between participants who used each. Task performance also varied by type of strategy used with verbal strategies showing an advantage. In addition, performance on neuropsychological tests (indices from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV, Rey Complex Figure Test) correlated significantly with fractional anisotropy measures for the visuospatial strategy group in white matter tracts implicated in other WM and attention studies. We conclude that differences in memory strategy can have a pronounced effect on the locations and timing of brain activation and that these differences need further investigation as a possible confounding factor for studies using group averaging as a means for summarizing results.
Copyright © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MEG; brain networks; magnetoencephalography; memory strategies; verbal memory; visual memory

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24931401      PMCID: PMC4315666          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.22538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  72 in total

1.  Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate.

Authors:  F A Middleton; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Projections from the hippocampal region to the mammillary bodies in macaque monkeys.

Authors:  John P Aggleton; Seralynne D Vann; Richard C Saunders
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.386

3.  Quantitative investigation of connections of the prefrontal cortex in the human and macaque using probabilistic diffusion tractography.

Authors:  Paula L Croxson; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Timothy E J Behrens; Matthew D Robson; Mark A Pinsk; Charles G Gross; Wolfgang Richter; Marlene C Richter; Sabine Kastner; Matthew F S Rushworth
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  MUSIC seeded multi-dipole MEG modeling using the Constrained Start Spatio-Temporal modeling procedure.

Authors:  D M Ranken; J M Stephen; J S George
Journal:  Neurol Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-11-30

5.  The value of Magnetoencephalography to guide electrode implantation in epilepsy.

Authors:  Zaloa Agirre-Arrizubieta; Ngoc J Thai; Antonio Valentín; Paul L Furlong; Stefano Seri; Richard P Selway; Robert D C Elwes; Gonzalo Alarcón
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Simulation studies of multiple dipole neuromagnetic source localization: model order and limits of source resolution.

Authors:  S Supek; C J Aine
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  The inferior parietal lobule is the target of output from the superior colliculus, hippocampus, and cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Clower; R A West; J C Lynch; P L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Diffusion tensor imaging of the superior longitudinal fasciculus and working memory in recent-onset schizophrenia.

Authors:  Katherine H Karlsgodt; Theo G M van Erp; Russell A Poldrack; Carrie E Bearden; Keith H Nuechterlein; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 13.382

9.  Distinct hippocampal regions make unique contributions to relational memory.

Authors:  Kelly Sullivan Giovanello; David Schnyer; Mieke Verfaellie
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.899

10.  Fiber pathways of attention subnetworks revealed with tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) and probabilistic tractography.

Authors:  Haitao Ge; Xuntao Yin; Junhai Xu; Yuchun Tang; Yan Han; Wenjian Xu; Zengchang Pang; Haiwei Meng; Shuwei Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Dynamic functional connectivity shapes individual differences in associative learning.

Authors:  Zainab Fatima; Natasha Kovacevic; Bratislav Misic; Anthony Randal McIntosh
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  What Individuals Experience During Visuo-Spatial Working Memory Task Performance: An Exploratory Phenomenological Study.

Authors:  Aleš Oblak; Anka Slana Ozimič; Grega Repovš; Urban Kordeš
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Neuroimaging investigations of dorsal stream processing and effects of stimulus synchrony in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Lori Sanfratello; Cheryl Aine; Julia Stephen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.376

4.  Brain structure and verbal function across adulthood while controlling for cerebrovascular risks.

Authors:  L Sanfratello; S L Lundy; C Qualls; J E Knoefel; J C Adair; A Caprihan; J M Stephen; C J Aine
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Working Memory for Signs with Poor Visual Resolution: fMRI Evidence of Reorganization of Auditory Cortex in Deaf Signers.

Authors:  Josefine Andin; Emil Holmer; Krister Schönström; Mary Rudner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Neural evidence for the use of digit-image mnemonic in a superior memorist: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Li-Jun Yin; Yu-Ting Lou; Ming-Xia Fan; Zhao-Xin Wang; Yi Hu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 7.  Remembering Preservation in Hippocampal Amnesia.

Authors:  Ian A Clark; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 24.137

8.  Visualising inter-subject variability in fMRI using threshold-weighted overlap maps.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Large-scale functional networks connect differently for processing words and symbol strings.

Authors:  Mia Liljeström; Johanna Vartiainen; Jan Kujala; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Interpreting and Utilising Intersubject Variability in Brain Function.

Authors:  Mohamed L Seghier; Cathy J Price
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 20.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.