Literature DB >> 21649720

Factors that influence cecal intubation rate during colonoscopy in deeply sedated patients.

Chen-Ming Hsu1, Wei-Pin Lin, Ming-Yao Su, Cheng-Tang Chiu, Yu-Pin Ho, Pang-Chi Chen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The technical performance of colonoscopy performed in deeply sedated patients differs from that performed without sedation or under minimal to moderate sedation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the factors affecting cecal intubation during colonoscopy performed under deep sedation.
METHODS: A total of 5352 consecutive subjects who underwent a screening colonoscopy as part of a health check-up between January 2008 and December 2008 at an academic hospital were reviewed. All endoscopies were performed with deep sedation using combination propofol or propofol alone. Data collected included characteristics of the patients (age, gender, body mass index, bowel habits, history of abdominal or pelvic surgery, quality of bowel preparation, and presence/absence of colonic diverticula) and characteristics of the colonoscopists (experience level, colonoscopy procedure volume, and instrument handling method). These factors were analyzed to evaluate their impact on cecal intubation rates.
RESULTS: The crude cecal intubation rate was 98% and the adjusted cecal intubation rate was 98.3%. The mean cecal intubation time was 5.6 ± 3.2 min. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that patient age greater than 60 years, constipation, poor colon preparation and a two-person colonoscopy procedure were independently associated with lower cecal intubation rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy performed under deep sedation by experienced colonoscopists results in high cecal intubation rates. Among the significant patient-related predictors influencing the cecal intubation, the quality of the bowel preparation was the only modifiable factor. When performed by experienced hands, the one-person method was associated with higher cecal intubation rates than the two-person method.
© 2011 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21649720     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.06795.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  24 in total

1.  Position Change in Colonoscopy-A Turn for the Better?

Authors:  Mohamed Kaif; Shajan Peter
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter Allescher; Vincens Weingart
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-09

3.  Second-Look Colonoscopies and the Impact on Capacity in FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Esmée J Grobbee; Atija Kapidzic; Anneke J van Vuuren; Monique van Leerdam; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Caspar W N Looman; Marco J Bruno; Ernst J Kuipers; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 4.  What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Authors:  Kelli S Hancock; Ranjan Mascarenhas; David Lieberman
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-06

5.  Quality in Colonoscopy: Beyond the Adenoma Detection Rate Fever.

Authors:  Filipe Taveira; Miguel Areia; Luís Elvas; Susana Alves; Daniel Brito; Sandra Saraiva; Ana Teresa Cadime
Journal:  GE Port J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-07-21

6.  Comparison of Water Immersion Versus Air Insufflation Colonoscopy Under Various Bowel Preparation Conditions.

Authors:  Sijia Niu; Youlin Yang; Guoyin Shang; Yingying Chen; Zhibin Ma; Feng Wu; Huichao Zhang
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.852

7.  Factors Affecting Cecal Intubation Time in Colonoscopy: Impact of Obesity.

Authors:  Beslen Goksoy; Mevlut Kiyak; Mehmet Karadag; Gokhan Yilmaz; Ibrahim F Azamat
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-05-31

8.  Comparison between the recovery time of alfentanil and fentanyl in balanced propofol sedation for gastrointestinal and colonoscopy: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Wai-Meng Ho; Chia-Ming Yen; Chin-Hung Lan; Chung-Yi Lin; Su-Boon Yong; Kai-Lin Hwang; Ming-Chih Chou
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  A comparison of positron emission tomography and colonoscopy for the detection of advanced colorectal neoplasms in subjects undergoing a health check-up.

Authors:  Shu-Wei Huang; Chen-Ming Hsu; Wen-Juei Jeng; Tzu-Chen Yen; Ming-Yao Su; Cheng-Tang Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sedation with etomidate-fentanyl versus propofol-fentanyl in colonoscopies: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Nadia Banihashem; Ebrahim Alijanpour; Majid Basirat; Javad Shokri Shirvany; Mehrdad Kashifard; Hasan Taheri; Shahriyar Savadkohi; Vahid Hosseini; Seyed Sedigheh Solimanian
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2015
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.