Literature DB >> 21646144

Codon usage patterns distort phylogenies from or of DNA sequences.

Michael L Christianson1.   

Abstract

Papers reporting phylogenetic reconstructions often include discussion of the nature of third position substitutions and have often treated third position data differently from other data. This paper extends such considerations. Plant biotechnologists interested in high levels of expression of foreign proteins have accumulated information on preferences for otherwise synonymous codons. This paper presents a simple analysis for codon bias. Not only is bias frequent, but bias also varies between cohorts of proteins, both by amino acid and by taxon. Analysis of codon usage in the parallel divergence of phytochromes in three model plants finds identical bias for all family members within each taxon and increasingly divergent patterns of bias between increasingly divergent taxa. The molecular constraint of taxon-specific pools of tRNA molecules means individual triplets in a coding sequence are often not independent; algorithms designed to analyze independent characters are inappropriate for such data. Although a misestimate of the number of differences between taxa and groups of taxa can still generate an accurate description of the nesting of clades, other phylogenetic parameters will be strongly affected. Importantly, since codon bias produces smaller-than-expected within-taxon variance (common use of favored triplets) and larger-than-expected between-taxa variance (different favorites in different taxa), statistical support for nodes is certain to be wrong. The translational control of gene expression mediated by codon bias has implications for modern molecular systematics.

Year:  2005        PMID: 21646144     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.8.1221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  8 in total

1.  Codon-usage bias versus gene conversion in the evolution of yeast duplicate genes.

Authors:  Yeong-Shin Lin; Jake K Byrnes; Jenn-Kang Hwang; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human alpha and beta papillomaviruses use different synonymous codon profiles.

Authors:  Nancy M Cladel; Alex Bertotto; Neil D Christensen
Journal:  Virus Genes       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 2.332

3.  Are "universal" DNA primers really universal?

Authors:  Pranay Sharma; Tsuyoshi Kobayashi
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  RNA-Seq based phylogeny recapitulates previous phylogeny of the genus Flaveria (Asteraceae) with some modifications.

Authors:  Ming-Ju Amy Lyu; Udo Gowik; Steve Kelly; Sarah Covshoff; Julia Mallmann; Peter Westhoff; Julian M Hibberd; Matt Stata; Rowan F Sage; Haorong Lu; Xiaofeng Wei; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Xin-Guang Zhu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in sixty-four different bivalve species.

Authors:  Marco Gerdol; Gianluca De Moro; Paola Venier; Alberto Pallavicini
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  ChloroMitoCU: Codon patterns across organelle genomes for functional genomics and evolutionary applications.

Authors:  Gaurav Sablok; Ting-Wen Chen; Chi-Ching Lee; Chi Yang; Ruei-Chi Gan; Jill L Wegrzyn; Nicola L Porta; Kinshuk C Nayak; Po-Jung Huang; Claudio Varotto; Petrus Tang
Journal:  DNA Res       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  The Codon Statistics Database: A Database of Codon Usage Bias.

Authors:  Krishnamurthy Subramanian; Bryan Payne; Felix Feyertag; David Alvarez-Ponce
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 8.800

8.  Codon Usage Bias and Cluster Analysis of the MMP-2 and MMP-9 Genes in Seven Mammals.

Authors:  Tanliang Ouyang; Jincheng Zhong; Zhixin Chai; Jiabo Wang; Ming Zhang; Zhijuan Wu; Jinwei Xin
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 1.375

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.