Literature DB >> 24839163

Are "universal" DNA primers really universal?

Pranay Sharma1, Tsuyoshi Kobayashi.   

Abstract

"Universal" DNA primers LCO 1490 and HCO 2198 were originally designed from three coding and six anticoding strands by comparing highly conserved regions of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) genes across 15 taxa. These primers have been successful in amplifying a 710-bp fragment of highly conserved regions of the COI gene for more than 80 invertebrate species from 11 phyla. In the present study, 130,843 variations were reviewed in the primer region of mitochondrial molecular markers by comparing 725 COI sequences from the kingdom Animalia. It was found that, for 177 invertebrate species, the forward primer (LCO 1490) showed only four conserved regions, compared to 12 in the original study. For ascidians, fungi and vertebrates, it showed approximately 50 % conserved regions, dropping to one conserved region for echinoderms. However, the reverse primer (HCO 2198) was highly conserved across 725 COI primer sequences. A similar pattern was observed in amino acid distributions. There was a significant difference in the means of base pair differences from the level of family, genus and species for LCO 1490 [analysis of variance (ANOVA), F 6,188 = 8.193, P < 0.001] and at the level of genus and species for HCO 2198 (ANOVA, F 6,77 = 2.538, P < 0.027). We conclude that, at different taxonomic levels, it is possible to design forward primers from reference sequences belonging to the level of order (maximum 5 bp differences), family (maximum 6 bp differences) or genus (maximum 1 bp difference). Reverse primers can be designed from the level of family (maximum 5 bp differences) or genus (maximum 2 bp differences).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24839163     DOI: 10.1007/s13353-014-0218-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Genet        ISSN: 1234-1983            Impact factor:   3.240


  19 in total

Review 1.  Mitochondrial evolution.

Authors:  M W Gray; G Burger; B F Lang
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Mitochondrial DNA: a tool for populational genetics studies.

Authors:  J A Castro; A Picornell; M Ramon
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes.

Authors:  Paul D N Hebert; Alina Cywinska; Shelley L Ball; Jeremy R deWaard
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Recovering full DNA barcodes from natural history collections of Tephritid fruitflies (Tephritidae, Diptera) using mini barcodes.

Authors:  J K J VAN Houdt; F C Breman; M Virgilio; M DE Meyer
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 7.090

5.  Widespread atypical mitochondrial DNA structure in isopods (Crustacea, Peracarida) related to a constitutive heteroplasmy in terrestrial species.

Authors:  Vincent Doublet; Roland Raimond; Frédéric Grandjean; Alexandra Lafitte; Catherine Souty-Grosset; Isabelle Marcadé
Journal:  Genome       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 2.166

6.  Insertions and duplications of mtDNA in the nuclear genomes of Old World monkeys and hominoids.

Authors:  R V Collura; C B Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-11-30       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evolution of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase II gene among 10 orders of insects.

Authors:  H Liu; A T Beckenbach
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates.

Authors:  O Folmer; M Black; W Hoeh; R Lutz; R Vrijenhoek
Journal:  Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol       Date:  1994-10

9.  Exploring the use of cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 (COI) for DNA barcoding of free-living marine nematodes.

Authors:  Sofie Derycke; Jan Vanaverbeke; Annelien Rigaux; Thierry Backeljau; Tom Moens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  DNA barcoding: promise and pitfalls.

Authors:  Craig Moritz; Carla Cicero
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comparing eDNA metabarcoding primers for assessing fish communities in a biodiverse estuary.

Authors:  Girish Kumar; Ashley M Reaume; Emily Farrell; Michelle R Gaither
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  A PCR Method That Can Be Further Developed into PCR-RFLP Assay for Eight Animal Species Identification.

Authors:  Feng Guan; Yu-Ting Jin; Jin Zhao; Ai-Chun Xu; Yuan-Yuan Luo
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  Instances of erroneous DNA barcoding of metazoan invertebrates: Are universal cox1 gene primers too "universal"?

Authors:  Monika Mioduchowska; Michał Jan Czyż; Bartłomiej Gołdyn; Jarosław Kur; Jerzy Sell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Slippage of degenerate primers can cause variation in amplicon length.

Authors:  Vasco Elbrecht; Paul D N Hebert; Dirk Steinke
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.