Literature DB >> 21645869

Nonoperative approaches to rectal cancer: a critical evaluation.

Angelita Habr-Gama1, Rodrigo O Perez, Guilherme P São Julião, Igor Proscurshim, Joaquim Gama-Rodrigues.   

Abstract

A neoadjuvant multimodality approach with chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the preferred treatment strategy for most distal rectal cancers. Significant downstaging and complete pathologic response may develop after this strategy, and there is still controversy regarding the management of these patients. In this setting, a nonoperative approach has been suggested in select patients with complete clinical response after thorough clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic assessment. However, the assessment of these patients is not straightforward and remains complex. Available data regarding this approach are limited to a single institution's experience from retrospective analyses. Standardization of the assessment of tumor response and the development of radiological/molecular tools may clarify the role of no immediate surgery in patients with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant CRT. Advances in radiation and medical oncology could potentially lead to significant improvements in complete tumor regression rates, leading to an increase in importance of a minimally invasive approach in patients with rectal cancer.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21645869     DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2011.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1053-4296            Impact factor:   5.934


  34 in total

Review 1.  Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irshad Shaikh; Alan Askari; Suzana Ourû; Janindra Warusavitarne; Thanos Athanasiou; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  [The role of cross-sectional imaging in staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  A O Schäfer; M Langer; T Baumann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Staging of rectal cancer].

Authors:  C T Germer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  Interval to surgery after neoadjuvant treatment for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Nir Wasserberg
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Predicting complete response: is there a role for non-operative management of rectal cancer?

Authors:  T Jonathan Yang; Karyn A Goodman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-04

Review 6.  Clinical utility of pretreatment prediction of chemoradiotherapy response in rectal cancer: a review.

Authors:  Byong Chul Yoo; Seung-Gu Yeo
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 7.  Treatment of colorectal cancer in older patients.

Authors:  Riccardo A Audisio; Demetris Papamichael
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Clinical tumour size and nodal status predict pathologic complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Mikaela L Garland; Ryash Vather; Noah Bunkley; Maria Pearse; Ian P Bissett
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 9.  Colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ernst J Kuipers; William M Grady; David Lieberman; Thomas Seufferlein; Joseph J Sung; Petra G Boelens; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 52.329

Review 10.  Imaging strategies in the management of oesophageal cancer: what's the role of MRI?

Authors:  Peter S N van Rossum; Richard van Hillegersberg; Frederiek M Lever; Irene M Lips; Astrid L H M W van Lier; Gert J Meijer; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Marco van Vulpen; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.