Literature DB >> 21642875

Evaluation of a VHA collaborative to improve follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test.

Adam A Powell1, Sean Nugent, Diana L Ordin, Siamak Noorbaloochi, Melissa R Partin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2005, the Veterans Health Administration initiated a yearlong Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative (C4) to improve timely follow-up after positive fecal occult blood tests.
METHODS: Twenty-one facilities formed local quality improvement (QI) teams. Teams received QI training, created process flow maps, implemented process changes, and shared learning through 2 face-to-face meetings, conference calls, and a discussion board. We evaluated pre-post change in the timeliness of follow-up among C4 facilities and 3 control facilities. Outcome measures included the proportion of patients receiving a follow-up colonoscopy within 1 year, the proportion receiving 60-day follow-up (the focus of C4 teams), and average days to colonoscopy. Survey data from C4 team members was analyzed to identify predictors of facility-level improvement.
RESULTS: Both C4 and control facilities improved on 1-year follow-up (10% and 9% increases, respectively, both P's<0.001). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion receiving 60-day follow-up among C4 facilities (27% pre-C4 vs. 39% post-C4, P=0.008) but a nonsignificant decrease among control facilities (45% pre-C4 vs. 29% post-C4, P=0.14). Average days to colonoscopy decreased significantly among C4 facilities (129 pre-C4 vs. 103 post-C4, P=0.004) but increased significantly among control facilities (81 pre-C4 vs. 103 post-C4, P=0.04). Teams with the most improvement established clear roles/goals, had previous QI training, made more use of QI tools, and incorporated primary care education into their improvement work.
CONCLUSIONS: A Veterans Health Administration improvement collaborative modestly decreased time to colonoscopy after a positive colorectal cancer screening test but significant room for improvement remains and benefits of participation were not realized by all facilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21642875     DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182204944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  15 in total

1.  Cancer incidence among patients of the U.S. Veterans Affairs Health Care System.

Authors:  Leah L Zullig; George L Jackson; Raye Anne Dorn; Dawn T Provenzale; Rebecca McNeil; Catherine M Thomas; Michael J Kelley
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice.

Authors:  Ann Oluloro; Amanda F Petrik; Ann Turner; Tanya Kapka; Jennifer Rivelli; Patricia A Carney; Somnath Saha; Gloria D Coronado
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-08

Review 3.  Reviewing cancer care team effectiveness.

Authors:  Stephen H Taplin; Sallie Weaver; Eduardo Salas; Veronica Chollette; Heather M Edwards; Suanna S Bruinooge; Michael P Kosty
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  Behavioral medicine translation in the Veterans Health Administration: editorial to the special section on the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Authors:  Sara J Knight; Robert D Kerns
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The Need for an Integrated Patient Navigation Pathway to Improve Access to Colonoscopy After Positive Fecal Immunochemical Testing: A Safety-Net Hospital Experience.

Authors:  Sreedevi Thamarasseril; Taft Bhuket; Chuck Chan; Benny Liu; Robert J Wong
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-06

6.  A Clinical Decision Support System for Monitoring Post-Colonoscopy Patient Follow-Up and Scheduling.

Authors:  Roxanne Wadia; Mark Shifman; Forrest L Levin; Luis Marenco; Cynthia A Brandt; Kei-Hoi Cheung; Tamar Taddei; Michael Krauthammer
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2017-07-26

7.  Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Amy A Gravely; James F Burgess; David A Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; David B Nelson; Sean M Nugent; Aasma Shaukat; Shahnaz Sultan; Louise C Walter; Diana J Burgess
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Organizational predictors of colonoscopy follow-up for positive fecal occult blood test results: an observational study.

Authors:  Melissa R Partin; Diana J Burgess; James F Burgess; Amy Gravely; David Haggstrom; Sarah E Lillie; Sean Nugent; Adam A Powell; Aasma Shaukat; Louise C Walter; David B Nelson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Improving hepatocellular carcinoma screening: applying lessons from colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Jasmin A Tiro; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Trends in Wait Time for Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Megan A Adams; Joel H Rubenstein; Rachel Lipson; Robert G Holleman; Sameer D Saini
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.