Literature DB >> 21642123

Ecological correlates of secondary sexual dimorphism in Salix glauca (Salicaceae).

Leah S Dudley1.   

Abstract

The ecological causation hypothesis for secondary sexual dimorphism was tested in Salix glauca, a dioecious willow shrub. Plants growing in a Colorado Rocky Mountain (USA) krummholz mosaic of mesic and xeric patches were monitored for four consecutive years. Ecological causation is predicated on unique resource demands associated with sexual function. In S. glauca, seeds have twofold higher N and P concentrations compared to pollen. P, but not N, allocation costs differed between sexes at plant and flower scales. Ecological causation also predicts spatial segregation of sexes along underlying habitat gradients. In five populations of S. glauca, sexes displayed significant spatial segregation. The theory also predicts that sexes differ in performance across gradients of environmental stress or resource availability. Consistent with this hypothesis, females had lower drought tolerance than males under years of extreme aridity. Furthermore, over 10 years, annual shoot growth for females was greatest in mesic habitat patches, while males grew at a consistent rate regardless of habitat aridity. Because current shoot growth is correlated with future catkin production, habitat specialization likely provides a fitness payoff in females. Overall, this long-term study provides some of the strongest evidence to date for ecological causation of secondary sexual dimorphism in plants.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 21642123     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.93.12.1775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  19 in total

1.  Inter-sexual competition in a dioecious grass.

Authors:  Charlene A Mercer; Sarah M Eppley
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Expansion of canopy-forming willows over the twentieth century on Herschel Island, Yukon Territory, Canada.

Authors:  Isla H Myers-Smith; David S Hik; Catherine Kennedy; Dorothy Cooley; Jill F Johnstone; Alice J Kenney; Charles J Krebs
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.129

Review 3.  Population structure, physiology and ecohydrological impacts of dioecious riparian tree species of western North America.

Authors:  K R Hultine; S E Bush; A G West; J R Ehleringer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Does sexual dimorphism predispose dioecious riparian trees to sex ratio imbalances under climate change?

Authors:  Kevin R Hultine; Susan E Bush; Joy K Ward; Todd E Dawson
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Impact of soil water chemistry on the apparent sex ratio of the flowering ramets of the dioecious plant Myrica gale var. tomentosa.

Authors:  Inoue Mizuki; Atsushi Kume; Masaaki Chiwa; Yoshitoshi Uehara; Kiyoshi Ishida
Journal:  J Plant Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  A test of the size-constraint hypothesis for a limit to sexual dimorphism in plants.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Labouche; John R Pannell
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Sex-related differences in reproductive allocation, growth, defense and herbivory in three dioecious neotropical palms.

Authors:  Verónica Cepeda-Cornejo; Rodolfo Dirzo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Allocation to male vs female floral function varies by currency and responds differentially to density and moisture stress.

Authors:  M T Brock; R L Winkelman; M J Rubin; C E Edwards; B E Ewers; C Weinig
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Stage-dependent patterns of drought tolerance and gas exchange vary between sexes in the alpine willow, Salix glauca.

Authors:  Leah S Dudley; Candace Galen
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 3.298

10.  Populus tremula (European aspen) shows no evidence of sexual dimorphism.

Authors:  Kathryn M Robinson; Nicolas Delhomme; Niklas Mähler; Bastian Schiffthaler; Jenny Onskog; Benedicte R Albrectsen; Pär K Ingvarsson; Torgeir R Hvidsten; Stefan Jansson; Nathaniel R Street
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.