Literature DB >> 21640455

A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of factors associated with trends in narrowing health inequalities in England.

Tim Blackman1, Jonathan Wistow, David Byrne.   

Abstract

This study explores why progress with tackling health inequalities has varied among a group of local authority areas in England that were set targets to narrow important health outcomes compared to national averages. It focuses on premature deaths from cancers and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and whether the local authority gap for these outcomes narrowed. Survey and secondary data were used to create dichotomised conditions describing each area. For cancers, ten conditions were found to be associated with whether or not narrowing occurred: presence/absence of a working culture of individual commitment and champions; spending on cancer programmes; aspirational or comfortable/complacent organisational cultures; deprivation; crime; assessments of strategic partnership working, commissioning and the public health workforce; frequency of progress reviews; and performance rating of the local Primary Care Trust (PCT). For CVD, six conditions were associated with whether or not narrowing occurred: a PCT budget closer or further away from target; assessments of primary care services, smoking cessation services and local leadership; presence/absence of a few major programmes; and population turnover. The method of Qualitative Comparative Analysis was used to find configurations of these conditions with either the narrowing or not narrowing outcomes. Narrowing cancer gaps were associated with three configurations in which individual commitment and champions was a necessary condition, and not narrowing was associated with a group of conditions that had in common a high level of bureaucratic-type work. Narrowing CVD gaps were associated with three configurations in which a high assessment of either primary care or smoking cessation services was a necessary condition, and not narrowing was associated with two configurations that both included an absence of major programmes. The article considers substantive and theoretical arguments for these configurations being causal and as pointing to ways of improving progress with tackling health inequalities.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640455     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  11 in total

1.  Using qualitative comparative analysis to understand and quantify translation and implementation.

Authors:  Heather Kane; Megan A Lewis; Pamela A Williams; Leila C Kahwati
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The use of Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) to address causality in complex systems: a systematic review of research on public health interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin Hanckel; Mark Petticrew; James Thomas; Judith Green
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Visualization of Dietary Patterns and Their Associations With Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Chung-Jung Chiu; Min-Lee Chang; Tricia Li; Gary Gensler; Allen Taylor
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  The use of evidence in English local public health decision-making: a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Dylan Kneale; Antonio Rojas-García; Rosalind Raine; James Thomas
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  New Zealand's Integration-Based Policy for Driving Local Health System Improvement - Which Conditions Underpin More Successful Implementation?

Authors:  Tim Tenbensel; Pushkar Raj Silwal; Lisa Walton; Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.120

6.  Impact on health inequalities of rising prosperity in England 1998-2007, and implications for performance incentives: longitudinal ecological study.

Authors:  Ben Barr; David Taylor-Robinson; Margaret Whitehead
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-04

7.  Using qualitative evidence on patients' views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions: a qualitative comparative analysis.

Authors:  Bridget Candy; Michael King; Louise Jones; Sandy Oliver
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Exploring Explanations for Local Reductions in Teenage Pregnancy Rates in England: An Approach Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Tim Blackman
Journal:  Soc Policy Soc       Date:  2013-01

9.  Success Factors of European Syndromic Surveillance Systems: A Worked Example of Applying Qualitative Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Alexandra Ziemann; Anne Fouillet; Helmut Brand; Thomas Krafft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Trade liberalization, social policies and health: an empirical case study.

Authors:  Courtney McNamara
Journal:  Global Health       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.185

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.