Literature DB >> 21640248

Bullying as strategic behavior: relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group.

Tjeert Olthof1, Frits A Goossens, Marjolijn M Vermande, Elisabeth A Aleva, Matty van der Meulen.   

Abstract

To examine whether bullying is strategic behavior aimed at obtaining or maintaining social dominance, 1129 9- to 12-year-old Dutch children were classified in terms of their role in bullying and in terms of their use of dominance oriented coercive and prosocial social strategies. Multi-informant measures of participants' acquired and desired social dominance were also included. Unlike non-bullying children, children contributing to bullying often were bistrategics in that they used both coercive and prosocial strategies and they also were socially dominant. Ringleader bullies also expressed a higher desire to be dominant. Among non-bullying children, those who tended to help victims were relatively socially dominant but victims and outsiders were not. Generally, the data supported the claim that bullying is dominance-oriented strategic behavior, which suggests that intervention strategies are more likely to be successful when they take the functional aspects of bullying behavior into account.
Copyright © 2011 Society for the Study of School Psychology. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21640248     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Psychol        ISSN: 0022-4405


  24 in total

1.  Aggression in schools: psychosocial outcomes of bullying among Indian adolescents.

Authors:  Prahbhjot Malhi; Bhavneet Bharti; Manjit Sidhu
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 1.967

2.  A Longitudinal Multilevel Study of Individual Characteristics and Classroom Norms in Explaining Bullying Behaviors.

Authors:  Miranda Sentse; René Veenstra; Noona Kiuru; Christina Salmivalli
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2015-07

3.  Did the ugly duckling have PTSD? Bullying, its effects, and the role of pediatricians.

Authors:  Mark A Schuster; Laura M Bogart
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-12-24       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents' bullying and likeability over time.

Authors:  Miranda Sentse; Noona Kiuru; René Veenstra; Christina Salmivalli
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2014-04-22

5.  The Co-evolution of Bullying Perpetration, Homophobic Teasing, and a School Friendship Network.

Authors:  Gabriel J Merrin; Kayla de la Haye; Dorothy L Espelage; Brett Ewing; Joan S Tucker; Matthew Hoover; Harold D Green
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2017-12-13

6.  How Does Guilt, Influence and Attitudes Effect the Role We Play in Bullying? The Self-Perception Measure.

Authors:  Ben Younan
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2019-02-04

7.  Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: a three wave longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  Albert Reijntjes; Marjolijn Vermande; Tjeert Olthof; Frits A Goossens; Rens van de Schoot; Liesbeth Aleva; Matty van der Meulen
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2013-11

8.  Bully/victims: a longitudinal, population-based cohort study of their mental health.

Authors:  Suzet Tanya Lereya; William E Copeland; Stanley Zammit; Dieter Wolke
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Bullying experience in urban adolescents: Prevalence and correlations with health-related quality of life and psychological issues.

Authors:  Anh Toan Ngo; Long Hoang Nguyen; Anh Kim Dang; Men Thi Hoang; Trang Huyen Thi Nguyen; Giang Thu Vu; Hoa Thi Do; Bach Xuan Tran; Carl A Latkin; Roger C M Ho; Cyrus S H Ho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Long-term effects of bullying.

Authors:  Dieter Wolke; Suzet Tanya Lereya
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.791

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.