| Literature DB >> 21637660 |
María Sol Brassesco1, Ana Paula Montaldi, Elza Tiemi Sakamoto-Hojo.
Abstract
Topoisomerase II inhibitors are effective chemotherapeutic agents in the treatment of cancer, in spite of being associated with the development of secondary leukemia. Our purpose was to determine the effects of etoposide on different genomic regions, aiming at discovering whether there are preferential sites which can be targeted by this drug in peripheral lymphocytes from healthy individuals. The in vitro treatment with low doses of etoposide (0.25, 0.5, and 1 μg/mL, in 1 hour-pulse or continuous-48 h treatment) induced a significant increase in chromosomal aberrations, detected by conventional staining and FISH with specific probes for chromosomes 8 and 11, compared with untreated controls (p < 0.05). Additionally, the frequencies of alterations at 11q23, detected by MLL specific probes, were significantly higher (p < 0.005) in treated cells than in controls. In contrast, an analysis of rearrangements involving the IGH gene did not disclose differences between treatments. The present results demonstrated the potential of etoposide to interact with preferential chromosome sites in human lymphocytes, even at concentrations below the mean plasma levels measured in cancer patients. This greater susceptibility to etoposide-induced cleavage may explain the more frequent involvement of MLL in treatment-related leukemia.Entities:
Keywords: etoposide; FISH; MLL translocations
Year: 2009 PMID: 21637660 PMCID: PMC3032972 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572009000100022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Mitotic indexes, chromosome aberration distribution (CAs), total CAs and altered metaphases in cultures treated with etoposide. Independent experiments were performed with blood samples from three individuals.
| Treatment | Mitotic index (mean ± SD) | Total CAs#/100 cells (mean ± SD) | Altered Metaphases/100 cells (mean ± SD) |
| Control | 5.14 ± 2.30 | 1.58 ± 0.57 | 1.58 ± 0.57 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (1 h) | 5.79 ± 2.28 | 7.3 ± 0.57 | 6.31 ± 0.57 |
| 0.5 μg/mL (1 h) | 5.12 ± 1.04 | 8.14 ± 2.08 | 6.83 ± 1.73 |
| 1 μg/mL (1 h) | 4.78 ± 2.34 | 9.22 ± 3.78 | 7.36 ± 2.51 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (48 h) | 2.71 ± 1.04 | 81.97 ± 13.20* | 35.72 ± 11.53* |
| 0.5 μg/mL (48 h) | 2.92 ± 1.36 | 93.77 ± 58.73* | 45.88 ± 22.94* |
| 1 μg/mL (48 h) | 1.89 ± 0.17 | 168.76 ± 44.19* | 74.01 ± 12.42* |
#Chromosome aberrations included chromatidic and chromosome gaps. chromatid and chromosome breaks; fragments. double minutes and other aberrations such as rings. dicentrics. triradial. tetraradial. and complex aberrations.
*Statistically different. p < 0.05.
Modality of treatment is indicated in brackets: 1 h pulse and 48 h continuous treatment.
Altered metaphases and chromosomal aberrations (CAs) detected with specific probes for chromosomes 8 and 11 in peripheral blood lymphocytes treated with etoposide. 1000 cells were analyzed per treatment/experiment.
| Treatment | Altered Metaphases/100 cells (mean±SD) | Total CAs#/100 cells (mean±SD) |
| Chromosome 11 | ||
| Control | 2.00 ± 2.00 | 0.186 ± 0.19 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (1 h) | 3.03 ± 2.88 | 0.46 ± 0.18 |
| 0.5 μg/mL (1 h) | 3.10 ± 7.81 | 0.34 ± 0.82 |
| 1 μg/mL (1 h) | 4.04 ± 4.93 | 0.46 ± 0.46 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (48 h) | 21.10 ± 9.45* | 2.11 ± 0.94* |
| 0.5 μg/mL (48 h) | 17.01 ± 9.60* | 3.89 ± 0.67* |
| 1 μg/mL (48 h) | 48.70 ± 19.13* | 9.85 ± 4.21* |
| Chromosome 8 | ||
| Control | 0.33 ± 0.57 | 0.03 ± 0.00 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (1 h) | 0.66 ± 0.57 | 0.08 ± 0.00 |
| 0.5 μg/mL (1 h) | 2.15 ± 2.08 | 0.22 ± 0.24 |
| 1 μg/mL (1 h) | 3.33 ± 2.88 | 0.22 ± 0.30 |
| 0.25 μg/mL (48 h) | 6.46 ± 2.08* | 0.70 ± 0.16* |
| 0.5 μg/mL (48 h) | 15.28 ± 1.52* | 1.76 ± 0.55* |
| 1 μg/mL (48 h) | 12.29 ± 13.45* | 3.28 ± 1.43* |
#Chromosome aberrations included chromatidic and chromosome gaps. chromatid and chromosome breaks; fragments. double minutes and other aberrations such as rings. dicentrics. triradial. tetraradial. and complex aberrations.
*Statistically different. p < 0.05.
Modality of treatment is indicated in brackets: 1 h pulse and 48 h continuous treatment.
Figure 1Mean aberration frequencies on chromosomes 8 and 11 (detected by chromosome painting), observed in lymphocyte cultures treated with different etoposide concentrations and negative controls. P: one-hour-pulse treatment.*Statistically different p < 0.05.
Figure 2MLL (A) and IGH (B) mean translocation and extra signal frequencies observed in peripheral blood lymphocytes cultures treated with different etoposide concentrations. P: one-hour-pulse treatment. *statistically different. p < 0.05.
Figure 3FISH analysis of peripheral lymphocytes treated with etoposide. a) and b) Normal methaphase with two MLL copies at 11q23 and translocated nucleus presenting the separation of signals, respectively. c) Normal metaphase with two IGH gene copies at 14q32. d) Translocated nucleus presenting the separation of signals. e) Normal metaphase showing chromosome pair 8 (WCP 8 Spectrum-Green) and chromosome pair 11 (WCP 11 Spectrum-orange). f) Partial metaphase showing a triradial chromosome involving both chromosomes. g) Partial metaphase showing a chromatid break. Figures of altered cells correspond to 1 μL/mL etoposide treatment.
Figure 4Mean aberration frequencies of apoptotic (white bars) and necrotic (grey bars) cells observed in negative controls and in lymphocyte cultures treated with different etoposide concentrations: A) One-hour-pulse treatment and B) continous 48 h treatment.