| Literature DB >> 21637609 |
Roberto Tarazi1, Maria Andréia Moreno, Flávio Bertin Gandara, Elza Martins Ferraz, Mário Luiz Teixeira Moraes, Christina Cleo Vinson, Ana Yamaguishi Ciampi, Roland Vencovsky, Paulo Yoshio Kageyama.
Abstract
Dipteryx alata is a native fruit tree species of the cerrado (Brazilian savanna) that has great economic potential because of its multiple uses. Knowledge of how the genetic variability of this species is organized within and among populations would be useful for genetic conservation and breeding programs. We used nine simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers developed for Dipteryx odorata to evaluate the genetic structure of three populations of D. alata located in central Brazil based on a leaf sample analysis from 101 adults. The outcrossing rate was evaluated using 300 open-pollinated offspring from 25 seed-trees. Pollen dispersal was measured by parentage analysis. We used spatial genetic structure (SGS) to test the minimal distance for harvesting seeds in conservation and breeding programs. Our data indicate that the populations studied had a high degree of genetic diversity and population structure, as suggested by the high level of divergence among populations . The estimated outcrossing rate suggested a mixed mating system, and the intrapopulation fixation index was influenced by SGS. We conclude that seed harvesting for genetic conservation and breeding programs requires a minimum distance between trees of 196 m to avoid collecting seeds from related seed-trees.Entities:
Keywords: Dipteryx alata; SSR; genetic structure; mating system
Year: 2010 PMID: 21637609 PMCID: PMC3036066 DOI: 10.1590/S1415-47572010005000007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Genet Mol Biol ISSN: 1415-4757 Impact factor: 1.771
Figure 1Dipteryx alata geographic distribution in the Brazilian cerrado biome (in gray) and the locations of the populations that were studied (•).
Sequences of the nine primer pairs developed for D. odorata, showing the temperature (°C) for primer annealing (T), sample size (n), allele size range (bp), number of alleles per locus (A), observed heterozygosity (H) and expected heterozygosity (H) of the amplified microsatellite loci in D. alata.
| Primer1 | Sequence (F- forward/ R- Reverse) | bp | |||||
| Do 05 | F: AgggAggCCAAgAAgTAAgC | 56 | 101 | 198-232 | 3 | 0.283 | 0.543 |
| Do 06 | F: AgCggTgAAAAgACCATAgC | 54 | 101 | 158-204 | 6 | 0.614 | 0.717 |
| Do 08 | F: AgATCAgCggACAAAggTCT | 58 | 101 | 175-205 | 8 | 0.377 | 0.652 |
| Do 17 | F: gTTgCTgTCggTTCTCCATA | 56 | 101 | 165-187 | 3 | 0.111 | 0.513 |
| Do 20 | F: gCCCATCTAAgCgCATTATT | 58 | 101 | 175-207 | 5 | 0.333 | 0.665 |
| Do 24 | F: AACgCAggATCTAgCCAAAA | 58 | 101 | 183-201 | 3 | 0.412 | 0.508 |
| Do 25 | F: AAATgCAAAACggAAgAggA | 56 | 101 | 195-223 | 4 | 0.520 | 0.660 |
| Do 31 | F: CAACATgCgATCCTTCCTTT | 56 | 101 | 198-218 | 5 | 0.100 | 0.497 |
| Do 35 | F: CAACCAAAgCAAACAAAgCA | 54 | 101 | 208-230 | 6 | 0.319 | 0.649 |
| Average | - | - | 101 | - | 4.780 | 0.341 | 0.619 |
1Primers developed by Vinson CC, MSc dissertation, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, 2004.
Estimates of genetic diversity and fixation indices (f) for three natural populations of D. alata in the cerrado.
| Population | ||||||
| MS | 41 | 89.9 | 2.9 | 0.353 | 0.420 | 0.161* |
| MG | 30 | 100 | 3.1 | 0.323 | 0.365 | 0.117* |
| GO | 30 | 100 | 3.2 | 0.347 | 0.375 | 0.077* |
| Mean over populations | 34 | 96.6 | 3.1 | 0.341 | 0.386 | 0.134 |
| Mean over loci | 101 | 100 | 4.7 | 0.341 | 0.619 | 0.122* |
A = mean number of alleles per locus, f = mean fixation index, H = mean expected heterozygosity, H = mean observed heterozygosity, n = sample size, P = percent polymorphic loci. *p-value = 0.0056.
Mating system estimates per family in a D. alata population.
| Family | ||||||
| 1 | 0.964 ± 0.038 | 0.118 ± 0.037 | 0.442 | 0.522 | 2.2 | 1008 (105-1636) |
| 2 | 0.338 ± 0.123 | 0.286 ± 0.087 | 0.029 | 0.309 | 11.8 | 1100 (105-1742) |
| 3 | 0.398 ± 0.128 | -0.391 ± 0.113 | 0.085 | 0.313 | 4.7 | 846 (131-1315) |
| 4 | 0.690 ± 0.119 | 0.045 ± 0.096 | 0.159 | 0.531 | 4.3 | 856 (131-1246) |
| 5 | 0.838 ± 0.089 | 0.139 ± 0.073 | 0.330 | 0.508 | 2.5 | 824 (238-1458) |
| 6 | 0.679 ± 0.126 | -0.203 ± 0.112 | 0.105 | 0.574 | 6.5 | 707 (238-1352) |
| 7 | 0.355 ± 0.119 | -0.250 ± 0.092 | 0.055 | 0.300 | 6.5 | 643 (65-1199) |
| 8 | 0.431 ± 0.128 | -0.228 ± 0.094 | 0.058 | 0.373 | 7.5 | 731 (174-1373) |
| 9 | 0.918 ± 0.069 | 0.115 ± 0.058 | 0.218 | 0.700 | 4.2 | 603 (65-1200) |
| 10 | 0.709 ± 0.116 | -0.171 ± 0.106 | 0.398 | 0.311 | 1.8 | 543 (129-1207) |
| 11 | 0.998 ± 0.005 | 0.031 ± 0.003 | 0.408 | 0.590 | 2.4 | 485 (80-1125) |
| 12 | 0.962 ± 0.041 | 0.102 ± 0.038 | 0.103 | 0.859 | 9.3 | 633 (274-1464) |
| 13 | 0.202 ± 0.101 | -0.495 ± 0.085 | 0.032 | 0.170 | 6.4 | 518 (86-1246) |
| 14 | 0.862 ± 0.089 | 0.016 ± 0.079 | 0.555 | 0.307 | 1.6 | 546 (102-1351) |
| 15 | 0.840 ± 0.087 | 0.211 ± 0.064 | 0.617 | 0.223 | 1.4 | 653 (58-1522) |
| 16 | 0.998 ± 0.005 | 0.050 ± 0.006 | 0.319 | 0.679 | 3.1 | 549 (86-1326) |
| 17 | 0.886 ± 0.077 | 0.050 ± 0.069 | 0.480 | 0.406 | 1.8 | 855 (70-1742) |
| 18 | 0.918 ± 0.067 | 0.197 ± 0.058 | 0.400 | 0.518 | 2.3 | 824 (80-1733) |
| 19 | 0.958 ± 0.039 | 0.093 ± 0.036 | 0.487 | 0.471 | 2.0 | 733 (113-1629) |
| 20 | 0.404 ± 0.128 | -0.344 ± 0.100 | 0.075 | 0.329 | 5.4 | 585 (75-1200) |
| 21 | 0.923 ± 0.063 | 0.133 ± 0.058 | 0.673 | 0.250 | 1.4 | 521 (41-1993) |
| 22 | 0.998 ± 0.005 | 0.064 ± 0.008 | 0.587 | 0.411 | 1.7 | 513 (77-1043) |
| 23 | 0.763 ± 0.105 | 0.020 ± 0.083 | 0.310 | 0.453 | 2.5 | 487 (90-1010) |
| 24 | 0.546 ± 0.129 | -0.248 ± 0.106 | 0.093 | 0.453 | 5.9 | 465 (63-978) |
| 25 | 0.998 ± 0.005 | 0.158 ± 0.018 | 0.541 | 0.457 | 1.8 | 487 (56-906) |
| Population | 0.711 ± 0.061 | 0.135 ± 0.034 | 0.480 | 0.230 | 1.5 | - |
d = mean distance to the nearest neighbor and ( ) range in meters, t = multilocus outcrossing rate, = outcrossing rate between related individuals, = correlated matings, = random matings and = effective pollen donors.
Figure 2Correlograms for three populations (MS, MG, GO) of D. alata showing the average coancestry coefficient (θ) between all pairs of adult trees. The values are the means ± 95% confidence intervals.