Literature DB >> 21636453

Variation in ovule and seed size and associated size-number trade-offs in angiosperms.

Carly A Greenway1, Lawrence D Harder.   

Abstract

Unlike pollen and seed size, the extent and causes of variation in ovule size remain unexplored. Based on 45 angiosperm species, we assessed whether intra- and interspecific variation in ovule size is consistent with cost minimization during ovule production or allows maternal plants to dominate conflict with their seeds concerning resource investment. Despite considerable intraspecific variation in ovule volume (mean CV = 0.356), ovule production by few species was subject to a size-number trade-off. Among the sampled species, ovule volume varied two orders of magnitude, whereas seed volume varied four orders of magnitude. Ovule volume varied positively among species with flower mass and negatively with ovule number. Tenuinucellate ovules were generally larger that crassinucellate ovules, and species with apical placentation (which mostly have uniovulate ovaries) had smaller ovules than those with other placentation types. Seed volume varied positively among species with fruit mass and seed development time, but negatively with seed number. Seeds grew a median 93-fold larger than the ovules from which they originated. Our results provide equivocal evidence that selection minimizes ovule size to allow efficient resource allocation after fertilization, but stronger evidence that ovule size affords maternal plants an advantage in parent-offspring conflict.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 21636453     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.94.5.840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  7 in total

1.  Evolution towards minimum ovule size? Ovule size variations and the relative sizes of ovules to seeds.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Itagaki; Jun Mochizuki; Yuta Aoyagi Blue; Masaya Ito; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  A multi-level test of the seed number/size trade-off in two Scandinavian communities.

Authors:  Amparo Lázaro; Asier R Larrinaga
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Range expansion decreases the reproductive fitness of Gentiana officinalis (Gentianaceae).

Authors:  Qin-Zheng Hou; Nasib Ur Rahman; Ahmad Ali; Yu-Pei Wang; Sakhawat Shah; Ehmet Nurbiye; Wen-Juan Shao; Muhammad Ilyas; Kun Sun; Rui Li; Fazal Said; Shah Fahad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Resource Translocation Modelling Highlights Density-Dependence Effects in Fruit Production at Various Levels of Organisation.

Authors:  Michel Génard; Françoise Lescourret; Nadia Bertin; Gilles Vercambre
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  On the use of the coefficient of variation to quantify and compare trait variation.

Authors:  Christophe Pélabon; Christoffer H Hilde; Sigurd Einum; Marlène Gamelon
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-05-14

6.  Ovule and seed production patterns in relation to flower size variations in actinomorphic and zygomorphic flower species.

Authors:  Jun Mochizuki; Tomoyuki Itagaki; Yuta Aoyagi Blue; Masaya Ito; Satoki Sakai
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 3.276

Review 7.  Evolutionary Genomics of Plant Gametophytic Selection.

Authors:  Felix E G Beaudry; Joanna L Rifkin; Spencer C H Barrett; Stephen I Wright
Journal:  Plant Commun       Date:  2020-10-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.