Literature DB >> 21636054

Informing patients about risks and benefits of radiology examinations: a review article.

Jeremy S Cardinal1, Richard B Gunderman, Robert D Tarver.   

Abstract

Communicating the risks, benefits, and alternatives to a planned medical intervention is integral to high-quality patient care. When effective, such communication promotes patient autonomy, alleviates unfounded patient apprehension, and mitigates medicolegal liability. The topic of medical radiation adds to the usual challenges of effective medical communication some special challenges of its own. Among these is a lack of understanding by the general population and health professionals of the benefits and risks of medical radiation, which is compounded by unfamiliar terminology and units of measure. This is further complicated by the fact that many patients have poor comprehension of risk data in general. In this article, the authors present a case, review the ethical basis and legal history of informed consent, and explore the current initiatives, available resources, and further opportunities related to this challenging topic.
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21636054     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2010.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  7 in total

1.  Information about radiation dose and risks in connection with radiological examinations: what patients would like to know.

Authors:  Leila Ukkola; Heljä Oikarinen; Anja Henner; Hilkka Honkanen; Marianne Haapea; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Use of contrast media in diagnostic imaging: medico-legal considerations.

Authors:  C Pomara; N Pascale; F Maglietta; M Neri; I Riezzo; E Turillazzi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Radiographic and magnetic resonances contrast agents: Essentials and tips for safe practices.

Authors:  Mohamed R Nouh; Mohamed A El-Shazly
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-28

4.  How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research.

Authors:  Tomas Rozbroj; Romi Haas; Denise A O'Connor; Rae Thomas; Kirsten McCaffery; Stacy Carter; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Computed Tomography in Trauma Patients Accepted in Transfer: Missed Injuries and Rationale for Repeat Imaging. Can we do Better?

Authors:  Seth A Vernon; Stephen D Helmer; Jeanette G Ward; James M Haan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2019-02-26

6.  Pneumothorax rates in CT-Guided lung biopsies: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors.

Authors:  Ya Ruth Huo; Michael Vinchill Chan; Al-Rahim Habib; Isaac Lui; Lloyd Ridley
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Are physicians ethically obligated to address hospice as an alternative to "usual" treatment of advancing end-stage disease?

Authors:  Frederick A Smith
Journal:  J IMA       Date:  2011-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.