Literature DB >> 21635338

Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning.

Michelene T H Chi1, Marguerite Roy, Robert G M Hausmann.   

Abstract

The goals of this study are to evaluate a relatively novel learning environment, as well as to seek greater understanding of why human tutoring is so effective. This alternative learning environment consists of pairs of students collaboratively observing a videotape of another student being tutored. Comparing this collaboratively observing environment to four other instructional methods-one-on-one human tutoring, observing tutoring individually, collaborating without observing, and studying alone-the results showed that students learned to solve physics problems just as effectively from observing tutoring collaboratively as the tutees who were being tutored individually. We explain the effectiveness of this learning environment by postulating that such a situation encourages learners to become active and constructive observers through interactions with a peer. In essence, collaboratively observing combines the benefit of tutoring with the benefit of collaborating. The learning outcomes of the tutees and the collaborative observers, along with the tutoring dialogues, were used to further evaluate three hypotheses explaining why human tutoring is an effective learning method. Detailed analyses of the protocols at several grain sizes suggest that tutoring is effective when tutees are independently or jointly constructing knowledge: with the tutor, but not when the tutor independently conveys knowledge. 2008 Cognitive Science Society, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21635338     DOI: 10.1080/03640210701863396

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Sci        ISSN: 0364-0213


  9 in total

1.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.

Authors:  Felix Nickel; Jonathan D Hendrie; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Thomas Bruckner; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Hannes G Kenngott; Philipp Romero; Lars Fischer; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  The effectiveness of argumentation in tutorial dialogues with an Intelligent Tutoring System for genetic risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cedillos-Whynott; Christopher R Wolfe; Colin L Widmer; Priscila G Brust-Renck; Audrey Weil; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2016-09

3.  How do gut feelings feature in tutorial dialogues on diagnostic reasoning in GP traineeship?

Authors:  C F Stolper; M W J Van de Wiel; R H M Hendriks; P Van Royen; M A Van Bokhoven; T Van der Weijden; G J Dinant
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  A Course-Embedded Comparison of Instructor-Generated Videos of Either an Instructor Alone or an Instructor and a Student.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Lu Ding; Michelle D Stephens; Michelene T H Chi; Sara E Brownell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  To guide or to follow? Teaching visual problem solving at the workplace.

Authors:  Thomas Jaarsma; Henny P A Boshuizen; Halszka Jarodzka; Jeroen J G van Merriënboer
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 3.853

6.  A Decision Tree Based Methodology for Evaluating Creativity in Engineering Design.

Authors:  Trina C Kershaw; Sankha Bhowmick; Carolyn Conner Seepersad; Katja Hölttä-Otto
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-25

7.  Verbal overshadowing of memories for fencing movements is mediated by expertise.

Authors:  Elise Defrasne Ait-Said; François Maquestiaux; André Didierjean
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A simulated night shift in the emergency room increases students' self-efficacy independent of role taking over during simulation.

Authors:  Fabian Stroben; Therese Schröder; Katja A Dannenberg; Anke Thomas; Aristomenis Exadaktylos; Wolf E Hautz
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial "The shoebox study".

Authors:  Jonathan D Hendrie; Felix Nickel; Thomas Bruckner; Karl-Friedrich Kowalewski; Carly R Garrow; Maisha Mantel; Philipp Romero; Beat P Müller-Stich
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.279

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.