Literature DB >> 21633489

Standardization in digital pathology: Supplement 145 of the DICOM standards.

Rajendra Singh1, Lauren Chubb, Liron Pantanowitz, Anil Parwani.   

Abstract

As digital slides need a lot of storage space, lack of a singular method to acquire and store these large, two-dimensional images has been a major stumbling block in the universal acceptance of this technology. The DICOMS Standard Committee Working Group 26 has put in a tremendous effort to standardize storage methods so that they are more in line with currently available PACS in most hospitals for storage of radiology images. A recent press release (Supplement 145) of these standards was hailed by one and all involved in the field of digital pathology as it will make it easier for hospitals to integrate digital pathology into their already established systems without adding too much overhead costs. Besides, it will enable different vendors developing the scanners to upgrade their products to storage systems that are common across all systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DICOM; Digital pathology; z-planes

Year:  2011        PMID: 21633489      PMCID: PMC3097525          DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.80719

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Inform


INTRODUCTION

Recently, new standardization was finalized for storage and retrieval of digital images which can enhance interplay between digital pathology systems and tools and other systems such as PACS systems used for Radiology and other medical imaging modalities. Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM), synonymous with ISO (International Organization for Standardization) standard 12052, is the global standard for medical imaging and is used in all electronic medical record systems that include imaging as part of the patient record.[1] Its continuing evolution is managed by a collaboration of 40 professional societies, government agencies, trade associations, and imaging equipment manufacturers, under the Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance (MITA). DICOM Standards Committee Working Group 26 is a group of people dedicated to the advancement of digital pathology. This group, along with the College of American Pathologist's Diagnostic Intelligence and Health Information Technology (DIHIT) Committee, developed standards for making digital pathology more universal.[23] This effort has helped move the field of digital pathology closer toward having a true, enterprise-wide Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) that can be used by all specialties in health care systems. Currently, most hospitals use a PACS to manage and store radiology images.[4] Until now, PACS software and the DICOM core standard did not accommodate pathology whole slide images (WSI).[56] The technical specifications approved for use by the Working group 26 will make it possible for clinical laboratories and pathology groups to store digital pathology images in a form that is compatible with the same DICOM archive systems currently being used by hospitals and other providers to distribute, view and store radiology images. The standard will enable the electronic display, sharing, storage, and management of static and WSI, or even larger images, used in pathology. It will also provide health care professionals with flexibility, such as panning and zooming, when interacting with the image. Although the DICOM standards have tried to standardize all of the steps involved in digitalizing slides (including image creation, acquisition, processing, analyzing, distribution, visualization, and data management), the most important impact has been on image storage, which actually has been one of the main stumbling blocks for universal acceptance of this technology. Standardization of all digital imaging aspects will also help develop open system scanners that readily store images into a commercially available PACS system using one DICOM-standard messaging. As of now, DICOM standards did not provide for singular methods to acquire and store large two-dimensional images, nor did they incorporate any way to handle stored images or multiple images of the same slide at various resolutions. Not only is storage important, but so too is retrieval so that one can easily interact with the images. These deficiencies have now been mostly resolved and standardized.

IMAGE STORAGE

The whole slide images (WSI) made by digitizing glass slides at diagnostic resolutions are very large. Typically, an H & E slide needs 4-20 GB of storage space, but some WSI may take up even larger space. Currently, the DICOM standard does not have provision for storage of these large two-dimensional images, nor does it incorporate a way to handle images so that they can be retrieved easily. The new recommendations suggest that the basic approach to storing large multi-resolution multi-planar WSI is to map subregions from each layer into a DICOM series. This is referred to as a tiled organization in which images are stored in squares or rectangular tiles, which are then stored in two-dimensional arrays. In simple terms, it is like cutting a large picture into smaller squares or rectangular fragments and then storing them together in a box. Multiple resolutions are stored in the same way. The highest resolution has the most data and will form the broadest row. Each row of less resolution will stack up on top of rows containing more resolution, forming a sort of pyramid. Each layer can then be retrieved and put together, to either form part of an image or the entire picture. This makes it relatively easy to randomly access any subregion of the image without loading large amounts of data. The images are stored at several precomputed resolutions, facilitating rapid zooming. Thus, the typical organization of a WSI for pathology will resemble a pyramid of image data. The highest resolutions captured by an image scanner will sit at the base of the pyramid, while the apex corresponds to the zoom or low power image. When multiple z-plane (vertical level) images are present, each plane will be stored separately on one level [Figure 1]. This approach required relatively minor conceptual changes in the DICOM standard and will make implementation by vendors with existing DICOM-compatible products easier, helping to foster adoption of this standard.
Figure 1

The highest resolutions captured by an image scanner will sit at the base of the pyramid, while the apex corresponds to the zoom or low power image. When multiple z-plane (vertical level) images are present, each plane will be stored separately on one level (This figure has been modified and redrawn using Supplement 145 as reference)

The highest resolutions captured by an image scanner will sit at the base of the pyramid, while the apex corresponds to the zoom or low power image. When multiple z-plane (vertical level) images are present, each plane will be stored separately on one level (This figure has been modified and redrawn using Supplement 145 as reference)

IMAGE COMPRESSION

Previously WSI data was compressed using either JPEG or JPEG2000 modalities. As JPEG2000 compressions yield higher compression and fewer image artifacts, it has advantages over other available systems for image compression standard and coding systems. However, other compression methods can also be used, including Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) or even private compression schemes. The pixel data can be monochrome, color (RGB or YCB, CR) or palette color.

WSI FRAME OF REFERENCE

In order that all digital slides be processed and handled similarly, the DICOM standards specify a particular corner of the slide as a normal reference origin and a right-handed (X, Y, Z) coordinate system for position from that origin. The top left corner of the total imaging area is used as the point of reference as shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

The top left corner of the total imaging area is used as the point of reference and a right-handed (X, Y, Z) coordinate system is followed for position from that origin (This figure has been modified and redrawn using Supplement 145 as reference)

The top left corner of the total imaging area is used as the point of reference and a right-handed (X, Y, Z) coordinate system is followed for position from that origin (This figure has been modified and redrawn using Supplement 145 as reference)

Z-PLANES

For WSI z-planes are imaginary focal planes described at a certain nominal physical height (in microns) of the image above a reference level, which is the glass slide in WSI. It provides information for spatial positioning of imaginary planes and all tiles from one z-plane should be stored at the same level within the pyramid model. It can thus help to match tiles form one z-plane when an image is being retrieved.

ANNOTATIONS

As annotations are created at a later time from the image acquisition, DICOM standards state that they will be recorded in a separate series (as a DICOM series is limited to objects of single modality, produced by single equipment, in a single procedure step).

WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT

Techniques that were in place for Radiology have been found adequate and useful for pathology and automated slide scanning modalities. These include the modalities wordlist (MWL) and modalities performance procedure setup (MPPS). These allow a scanner to query for slides by slide barcode. The scanner scans the label along with the slide and information from both these regions is sent together to the laboratory information system. On retrieval, all patient information comes along with the slide image. Both gross specimen photography and automated slide scanning modalities were incorporated into the MWL and MPPS services.

CONCLUSION

In addition, Supplement 145 added 56 new data elements to the DICOM Standard in 14 new or revised modules. Also included are seven new or revised DICOM structured data templates and 18 new defined value sets. Moreover, 80 new coded terminology concepts were added to SNOMED, and 36 to DICOM. This achievement has been hailed by those involved in the world of digital pathology. It will certainly make it easy for hospitals to integrate digital pathology into their already established radiology information systems. There is no need to reinvent the wheel. Secondly, digital pathology and other medical imaging vendors such as those who make PACS systems will now be in a position to enhance their products to support this new standard, enabling interoperability between systems for digital pathology images.
  5 in total

1.  Picture archiving and communication systems in digital cytology.

Authors:  Sandra Morelli; Mauro Grigioni; Maria Rosaria Giovagnoli; Simone Balzano; Daniele Giansanti
Journal:  Ann Ist Super Sanita       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.663

2.  Refining DICOM for pathology--progress from the IHE and DICOM pathology working groups.

Authors:  Christel Le Bozec; Dominique Henin; Bettina Fabiani; Thomas Schrader; Marcial Garcia-Rojo; Bruce Beckwith
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2007

3.  Standards to support information systems integration in anatomic pathology.

Authors:  Christel Daniel; Marcial García Rojo; Karima Bourquard; Dominique Henin; Thomas Schrader; Vincenzo Della Mea; John Gilbertson; Bruce A Beckwith
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 4.  DICOM and radiology: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Charles E Kahn; John A Carrino; Michael J Flynn; Donald J Peck; Steven C Horii
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.532

5.  Linking whole-slide microscope images with DICOM by using JPEG2000 interactive protocol.

Authors:  Vilppu J Tuominen; Jorma Isola
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 4.056

  5 in total
  31 in total

1.  Open access image repositories: high-quality data to enable machine learning research.

Authors:  F Prior; J Almeida; P Kathiravelu; T Kurc; K Smith; T J Fitzgerald; J Saltz
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 2.350

2.  Digital pathology consultations-a new era in digital imaging, challenges and practical applications.

Authors:  Gonzalo Romero Lauro; William Cable; Andrew Lesniak; Eugene Tseytlin; Jeff McHugh; Anil Parwani; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The Digital Slide Archive: A Software Platform for Management, Integration, and Analysis of Histology for Cancer Research.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Mohammed Khalilia; Sanghoon Lee; Michael Nalisnik; Zach Mullen; Jonathan Beezley; Deepak R Chittajallu; David Manthey; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Cancer Digital Slide Archive: an informatics resource to support integrated in silico analysis of TCGA pathology data.

Authors:  David A Gutman; Jake Cobb; Dhananjaya Somanna; Yuna Park; Fusheng Wang; Tahsin Kurc; Joel H Saltz; Daniel J Brat; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Pathology Imaging Informatics for Clinical Practice and Investigative and Translational Research.

Authors:  Evita T Sadimin; David J Foran
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci (Boston)       Date:  2012-04

6.  Bringing Open Data to Whole Slide Imaging.

Authors:  Sébastien Besson; Roger Leigh; Melissa Linkert; Chris Allan; Jean-Marie Burel; Mark Carroll; David Gault; Riad Gozim; Simon Li; Dominik Lindner; Josh Moore; Will Moore; Petr Walczysko; Frances Wong; Jason R Swedlow
Journal:  Digit Pathol (2019)       Date:  2019-07-03

7.  Integration of digital gross pathology images for enterprise-wide access.

Authors:  Milon Amin; Gaurav Sharma; Anil V Parwani; Ralph Anderson; Brian J Kolowitz; Anthony Piccoli; Rasu B Shrestha; Gonzalo Romero Lauro; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2012-03-16

8.  Biomedical imaging ontologies: A survey and proposal for future work.

Authors:  Barry Smith; Sivaram Arabandi; Mathias Brochhausen; Michael Calhoun; Paolo Ciccarese; Scott Doyle; Bernard Gibaud; Ilya Goldberg; Charles E Kahn; James Overton; John Tomaszewski; Metin Gurcan
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2015-06-23

9.  High-definition hematoxylin and eosin staining in a transition to digital pathology.

Authors:  Jamie D Martina; Christopher Simmons; Drazen M Jukic
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-10-19

10.  Telecytology: Clinical applications, current challenges, and future benefits.

Authors:  Michael Thrall; Liron Pantanowitz; Walid Khalbuss
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2011-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.