Literature DB >> 21633191

Air pollution impedes plant-to-plant communication, but what is the signal?

James D Blande1, Tao Li, Jarmo K Holopainen.   

Abstract

Since the first reports that undamaged plants gain defensive benefits following exposure to damaged neighbors, the idea that plants may signal to each other has attracted much interest. There has also been substantial debate concerning the ecological significance of the process and the evolutionary drivers. Part of this debate has centered on the distance over which signaling between plants occurs in nature. In a recent study we showed that an ozone concentration of 80 ppb, commonly encountered in nature, significantly reduces the distance over which plant-plant signaling occurs in lima bean. We went on to show that degradation of herbivore-induced plant volatiles by ozone is the likely mechanism for this. The key question remaining from our work was that if ozone is degrading the signal in transit between plants, which chemicals are responsible for transmitting the signal in purer air? Here we present the results of a small scale experiment testing the role of the two most significant herbivore-induced terpenes and discuss our results in terms of other reported functions for these chemicals in plant-plant signaling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21633191      PMCID: PMC3257783          DOI: 10.4161/psb.6.7.15551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Signal Behav        ISSN: 1559-2316


  12 in total

1.  Neighbors affect resistance to herbivory--a new mechanism.

Authors:  Richard Karban
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 10.151

2.  Explaining evolution of plant communication by airborne signals.

Authors:  Martin Heil; Richard Karban
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Birch (Betula spp.) leaves adsorb and re-release volatiles specific to neighbouring plants--a mechanism for associational herbivore resistance?

Authors:  Sari J Himanen; James D Blande; Tero Klemola; Juha Pulkkinen; Juha Heijari; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Plants may talk, but can they hear?

Authors:  R D Firn; C G Jones
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Herbivory-induced volatiles elicit defence genes in lima bean leaves.

Authors:  G Arimura; R Ozawa; T Shimoda; T Nishioka; W Boland; J Takabayashi
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-03       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Damage-induced resistance in sagebrush: volatiles are key to intra- and interplant communication.

Authors:  Richard Karban; Kaori Shiojiri; Mikaela Huntzinger; Andrew C McCall
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  Air pollution impedes plant-to-plant communication by volatiles.

Authors:  James D Blande; Jarmo K Holopainen; Tao Li
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 9.492

8.  Within-plant signalling via volatiles overcomes vascular constraints on systemic signalling and primes responses against herbivores.

Authors:  Christopher J Frost; Heidi M Appel; John E Carlson; Consuelo M De Moraes; Mark C Mescher; Jack C Schultz
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 9.492

9.  Monoterpene-induced molecular responses in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Kimberley-Ann Godard; Richard White; Jörg Bohlmann
Journal:  Phytochemistry       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 4.072

10.  The role of ozone-reactive compounds, terpenes, and green leaf volatiles (glvs), in the orientation of Cotesia plutellae.

Authors:  Delia M Pinto; Anne-Marja Nerg; Jarmo K Holopainen
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.793

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Plant volatiles as cues and signals in plant communication.

Authors:  Velemir Ninkovic; Dimitrije Markovic; Merlin Rensing
Journal:  Plant Cell Environ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 7.228

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.