Literature DB >> 21632392

Responses of two bunchgrasses to nitrogen addition in tallgrass prairie: the role of bud bank demography.

Harmony J Dalgleish1, Abigail R Kula, David C Hartnett, Brett K Sandercock.   

Abstract

Growth of tallgrass prairie plants, many of which maintain substantial bud banks, can be limited by nitrogen (N), water, and/or light. We hypothesized that tallgrass prairie plants respond to increases in N through demographic effects on the bud bank. We tested the effects of a pulse of N on (1) bud bank demography, (2) plant reproductive allocation, and (3) ramet size. We parameterized matrix models, considering each genet as a population of plant parts. Nitrogen addition significantly impacted bud bank demography in two subdominant species of bunchgrass: Sporobolus heterolepis (a C(4) grass) and Koeleria macrantha (a C(3) grass), but had no effect on the size of individual ramets. Emergence from the bud bank and ramet population growth rates (λ) were significantly higher in S. heterolepis genets that received supplemental N. Nitrogen addition also affected the bud demography of K. macrantha, but N addition decreased rather than increased λ. Prospective and retrospective demographic analyses indicated that bud bank dynamics were the most important demographic processes driving plant responses to nutrient availability. Thus, the variation in productivity in these tallgrass prairie species is driven principally by the demography of the bud bank rather than by the physiology and growth of aboveground tillers. Improved understanding of bud bank dynamics may lead to improved predictive models of grassland responses to environmental changes such as altered N deposition and precipitation.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 21632392     DOI: 10.3732/ajb.2007277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  5 in total

1.  Incorporating clonal growth form clarifies the role of plant height in response to nitrogen addition.

Authors:  Laura Gough; Katherine L Gross; Elsa E Cleland; Christopher M Clark; Scott L Collins; Joseph E Fargione; Steven C Pennings; Katharine N Suding
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  The ecology and significance of below-ground bud banks in plants.

Authors:  Jacqueline P Ott; Jitka Klimešová; David C Hartnett
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Differences in below-ground bud bank density and composition along a climatic gradient in the temperate steppe of northern China.

Authors:  Jianqiang Qian; Zhengwen Wang; Jitka Klimešová; Xiaotao Lü; Wennong Kuang; Zhimin Liu; Xingguo Han
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Responses of Plant Bud Bank Characteristics to the Enclosure in Different Desertified Grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau.

Authors:  Xinjing Ding; Peixi Su; Zijuan Zhou; Rui Shi; Jianping Yang
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-12

5.  Increased Precipitation and Nitrogen Alter Shrub Architecture in a Desert Shrubland: Implications for Primary Production.

Authors:  Weiwei She; Yuqing Zhang; Shugao Qin; Bin Wu; Yuxuan Bai
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 6.627

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.