Literature DB >> 21631909

Care bundles: implementing evidence or common sense?

Luigi Camporota1, Stephen Brett.   

Abstract

Care bundles aim to improve standard of care and patient outcome by promoting the consistent implementation of a group of effective interventions. However, a variety of barriers prevent their full application in clinical practice. Here, we discuss some of the benefits and limitations of care bundles in the delivery of safer and more effective and consistent health care.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2011        PMID： 21631909      PMCID： PMC3218985          DOI： 10.1186/cc10232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN： 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


  9 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Why do physicians not follow evidence-based guidelines for preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia?: a survey based on the opinions of an international panel of intensivists.

Authors:  Jordi Rello; Carmen Lorente; Maria Bodí; Emili Diaz; Maite Ricart; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  A European care bundle for management of ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Authors:  Jordi Rello; Jean Chastre; Giuseppe Cornaglia; Robert Masterton
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Thought outside the box: intensive care unit freakonomics and decision making in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Deepika Mohan; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 5.  Oiling the wheels of intensive care to reduce "machine friction": the best way to improve outcomes?

Authors:  Susanna Walker; Stephen Brett
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The 2008 international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: merits and weaknesses.

Authors:  M Antonelli; G Mercurio
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Guidelines have done more harm than good.

Authors:  Richard Amerling; James F Winchester; Claudio Ronco
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 2.614

Review 8.  An evidence-based recommendation on bed head elevation for mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Barbara S Niël-Weise; Petra Gastmeier; Axel Kola; Ralf P Vonberg; Jan C Wille; Peterhans J van den Broek
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Guidance in sepsis management: navigating uncharted waters?

Authors:  Michael C Reade; Stephen J Warrillow; John A Myburgh; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 9.097
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Association of Registered Nurse Staffing With Mortality Risk of Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized With Sepsis.

Authors:  Jeannie P Cimiotti; Edmund R Becker; Yin Li; Douglas M Sloane; Scott K Fridkin; Anna Beth West; Linda H Aiken
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-05-27

2.  Tailoring International Pressure Ulcer Prevention Guidelines for Nigeria: A Knowledge Translation Study Protocol.

Authors:  Rose Ekama Ilesanmi; Brigid M Gillespie; Prisca Olabisi Adejumo; Wendy Chaboyer
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2015-07-28

3.  The Use of Standardized Management Protocols for Critically Ill Patients with Non-traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shaurya Taran; Vatsal Trivedi; Jeffrey M Singh; Shane W English; Victoria A McCredie
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.210
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.