Literature DB >> 21164408

Thought outside the box: intensive care unit freakonomics and decision making in the intensive care unit.

Deepika Mohan1, Derek C Angus.   

Abstract

Despite concerted efforts to improve the quality of care provided in the intensive care unit, inconsistency continues to characterize physician decision making. The resulting variations in care compromise outcomes and impose unnecessary decisional regret on clinicians and patients alike. Critical care is not the only arena where decisions fail to conform to the dictates of logic. Behavioral psychology uses scientific methods to analyze the influence of social, cognitive, and emotional factors on decisions. The overarching hypothesis underlying this "thought outside the box" is that the application of behavioral psychology to physician decision making in the intensive care unit will demonstrate the existence of cognitive biases associated with classic intensive care unit decisions; provide insight into novel strategies to train intensive care unit clinicians to better use data; and improve the quality of decision making in the intensive care unit as characterized by more consistent, patient-centered decisions with reduced decisional regret and work-related stress experienced by physicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21164408     DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f202c3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  6 in total

1.  Care bundles: implementing evidence or common sense?

Authors:  Luigi Camporota; Stephen Brett
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 9.097

2.  The consistent inconsistency of fluid challenges in the ICU: We should reflect on extreme variation in our practice.

Authors:  David Gattas; Anders Åneman
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-07-11       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Dealing with internet-based information obtained by families of critically ill patients.

Authors:  Yên-Lan Nguyen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  The challenge of admitting the very elderly to intensive care.

Authors:  Yên-Lan Nguyen; Derek C Angus; Ariane Boumendil; Bertrand Guidet
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  Mechanical ventilation and clinical practice heterogeneity in intensive care units: a multicenter case-vignette study.

Authors:  Yên-Lan Nguyen; Elodie Perrodeau; Bertrand Guidet; Ludovic Trinquart; Jean-Christophe M Richard; Alain Mercat; Philippe Jolliet; Philippe Ravaud; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 6.925

6.  European trauma guideline compliance assessment: the ETRAUSS study.

Authors:  Sophie Rym Hamada; Tobias Gauss; Jakob Pann; Martin Dünser; Marc Leone; Jacques Duranteau
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 9.097

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.