Literature DB >> 21630425

Evaluation of mailed pediatric buccal cytobrushes for use in a case-control study of birth defects.

Margaret L Gallagher1, Cynthia Sturchio, Ashley Smith, Deborah Koontz, Mary M Jenkins, Margaret A Honein, Sonja A Rasmussen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Buccal cell collection is a convenient DNA collection method; however, little attention has been given to the quality of DNA obtained from pediatric populations. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of a modified cytobrush collection method on the yield and quality of infant buccal DNA collected as part of a population-based case-control study of birth defects. METHODS Cytobrushes were collected from infants, mothers, and fathers using a standard collection method in 1997 to 2003 and a modified protocol that allows air-drying of the cytobrushes after collection from 2003 to the present. Yield and quality of DNA from 1057 cytobrushes was assessed by quantitative PCR and short tandem repeat (STR) genotyping, respectively. RESULTS Air-dried cytobrushes from infants had higher median DNA yields (1300 ng) and STR completion rates (99.5%) than standard collection method cytobrushes (60 ng and 59.5%, respectively). A subset of DNA aliquots was genotyped for six single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Aliquots from both collection methods that passed the quality protocol (DNA concentration >1 ng/μl, and successful amplification of ≥1 STR) had high genotype completion rates (99-100%). The median DNA yield following whole genome amplification was more than twofold higher for air-dried than standard collection specimens (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Yield and quality of buccal DNA collected from infants are improved by using a method that incorporates air-drying; however, DNA collected by both methods is suitable for genotyping if stringent quality control procedures are instituted. These findings may be helpful for future epidemiologic studies of birth defects and other adverse pediatric outcomes.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21630425     DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol        ISSN: 1542-0752


  12 in total

Review 1.  The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.

Authors:  Jennita Reefhuis; Suzanne M Gilboa; Marlene Anderka; Marilyn L Browne; Marcia L Feldkamp; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mary M Jenkins; Peter H Langlois; Kimberly B Newsome; Andrew F Olshan; Paul A Romitti; Stuart K Shapira; Gary M Shaw; Sarah C Tinker; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2015-06-02

2.  Exome sequencing of family trios from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study: Tapping into a rich resource of genetic and environmental data.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Lynn M Almli; Faith Pangilinan; Jessica X Chong; Elizabeth E Blue; Stuart K Shapira; Janson White; Daniel McGoldrick; Joshua D Smith; James C Mullikin; Christopher J Bean; Wendy N Nembhard; Xiang-Yang Lou; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti; Kim Keppler-Noreuil; Mahsa M Yazdy; Denise M Kay; Tonia C Carter; Andrew F Olshan; Kristin J Moore; Nanette Nascone-Yoder; Richard H Finnell; Philip J Lupo; Marcia L Feldkamp; Deborah A Nickerson; Michael J Bamshad; Lawrence C Brody; Jennita Reefhuis
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-07-21       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  Detecting maternal-fetal genotype interactions associated with conotruncal heart defects: a haplotype-based analysis with penalized logistic regression.

Authors:  Ming Li; Stephen W Erickson; Charlotte A Hobbs; Jingyun Li; Xinyu Tang; Todd G Nick; Stewart L Macleod; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-02       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  A Three-Way Interaction among Maternal and Fetal Variants Contributing to Congenital Heart Defects.

Authors:  Ming Li; Jingyun Li; Changshuai Wei; Qing Lu; Xinyu Tang; Stephen W Erickson; Stewart L MacLeod; Charlotte A Hobbs
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 1.670

5.  Testing Allele Transmission of an SNP Set Using a Family-Based Generalized Genetic Random Field Method.

Authors:  Ming Li; Jingyun Li; Zihuai He; Qing Lu; John S Witte; Stewart L Macleod; Charlotte A Hobbs; Mario A Cleves
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.135

6.  A genetic association study detects haplotypes associated with obstructive heart defects.

Authors:  Ming Li; Mario A Cleves; Himel Mallick; Stephen W Erickson; Xinyu Tang; Todd G Nick; Stewart L Macleod; Charlotte A Hobbs
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Impact of sample collection participation on the validity of estimated measures of association in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study when assessing gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Jennita Reefhuis; Amy H Herring; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  A pyrosequencing-based assay for the rapid detection of the 22q11.2 deletion in DNA from buccal and dried blood spot samples.

Authors:  Deborah Koontz; Kirsten Baecher; Lisa Kobrynski; Stanimila Nikolova; Margaret Gallagher
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.568

9.  Maternal smoking, xenobiotic metabolizing enzyme gene variants, and gastroschisis risk.

Authors:  Mary M Jenkins; Jennita Reefhuis; Margaret L Gallagher; Jennifer G Mulle; Thomas J Hoffmann; Deborah A Koontz; Cynthia Sturchio; Sonja A Rasmussen; John S Witte; Patricia Richter; Margaret A Honein
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  Predictors of mother and child DNA yields in buccal cell samples collected in pediatric cancer epidemiologic studies: a report from the Children's Oncology group.

Authors:  Jenny N Poynter; Julie A Ross; Anthony J Hooten; Erica Langer; Crystal Blommer; Logan G Spector
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.