Literature DB >> 21627417

Is the use of symphysis-fundal height measurement and ultrasound examination effective in detecting small or large fetuses?

K Hargreaves1, M Cameron, H Edwards, R Gray, K Deane.   

Abstract

We investigated the accuracy of using symphysis pubis-fundal height measurement and ultrasonically derived estimation of fetal weight for identifying small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) fetuses. A retrospective cohort study was performed using computerised records of all non-diabetic women referred for an ultrasound growth scan (US) with clinically suspected SGA or LGA singleton fetuses from 35 weeks' gestation between October 2008 and March 2009 (n = 185). Birth weight data were also collected for all births over the study period (n = 3200). One-third (34%) of ultrasound estimated fetal weights were inaccurate by >10%. However, an inaccurate ultrasound estimation did not significantly increase the likelihood of spontaneous or induced onset of labour or delivery by caesarean section. Most (79%) growth scans were performed on well-grown fetuses. The majority (80%) of SGA and LGA babies in our cohort were not identified by clinicians during routine antenatal care. From 3,200 live births, there were a total of 59 infants weighing <2,500 g or >5,000 g. Of these, only 12 had been referred for an ultrasound growth scan, indicating that abdominal palpation and fundal height measurement has a 20% sensitivity in detecting SGA or LGA fetuses. Of the 12, four were detected using ultrasound, indicating a 33% detection rate. Although ultrasound has a slightly higher sensitivity, neither clinical examination using fundal height measurements nor 3rd trimester ultrasound examinations are effective at detecting SGA or LGA fetuses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21627417     DOI: 10.3109/01443615.2011.567343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0144-3615            Impact factor:   1.246


  6 in total

1.  A predictor of small-for-gestational-age infant: oral glucose challenge test.

Authors:  Y Cekmez; E Ozkaya; F D Öcal; N Süer; T Küçüközkan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Biochemical tests of placental function versus ultrasound assessment of fetal size for stillbirth and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Authors:  Alexander Ep Heazell; Dexter Jl Hayes; Melissa Whitworth; Yemisi Takwoingi; Susan E Bayliss; Clare Davenport
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-05-14

3.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of routine third trimester ultrasound screening for intrauterine growth restriction: study protocol of a nationwide stepped wedge cluster-randomized trial in The Netherlands (The IRIS Study).

Authors:  Jens Henrichs; Viki Verfaille; Laura Viester; Myrte Westerneng; Bert Molewijk; Arie Franx; Henriette van der Horst; Judith E Bosmans; Ank de Jonge; Petra Jellema
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Assessing the sensitivity of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 at 36 weeks' gestation to predict small-for-gestational-age infants or late-onset preeclampsia: a prospective nested case-control study.

Authors:  Teresa M MacDonald; Chuong Tran; Tu'uhevaha J Kaitu'u-Lino; Shaun P Brennecke; Richard J Hiscock; Lisa Hui; Kirsten M Dane; Anna L Middleton; Ping Cannon; Susan P Walker; Stephen Tong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Screening for fetal growth disorders by clinical exam in the era of obesity.

Authors:  K R Goetzinger; M G Tuuli; A O Odibo; K A Roehl; G A Macones; A G Cahill
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.521

6.  The effect of offering a third-trimester routine ultrasound on pregnancy-specific anxiety and mother-to-infant bonding in low-risk women: A pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Myrte Westerneng; Ank de Jonge; Anneloes L van Baar; Anke B Witteveen; Petra Jellema; K Marieke Paarlberg; Marlies Rijnders; Henriëtte E van der Horst
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 3.081

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.