Literature DB >> 21626219

More education, less administration: reflections of neuroimagers' attitudes to ethics through the qualitative looking glass.

A A Kehagia1, K Tairyan, C Federico, G H Glover, J Illes.   

Abstract

In follow-up to a large-scale ethics survey of neuroscientists whose research involves neuroimaging, brain stimulation and imaging genetics, we conducted focus groups and interviews to explore their sense of responsibility about integrating ethics into neuroimaging and readiness to adopt new ethics strategies as part of their research. Safety, trust and virtue were key motivators for incorporating ethics into neuroimaging research. Managing incidental findings emerged as a predominant daily challenge for faculty, while student reports focused on the malleability of neuroimaging data and scientific integrity. The most frequently cited barrier was time and administrative burden associated with the ethics review process. Lack of scholarly training in ethics also emerged as a major barrier. Participants constructively offered remedies to these challenges: development and dissemination of best practices and standardized ethics review for minimally invasive neuroimaging protocols. Students in particular, urged changes to curricula to include early, focused training in ethics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626219     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9282-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  11 in total

1.  From neuroimaging to neuroethics.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Matthew P Kirschen; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Perspectives of Canadian researchers on ethics review of neuroimaging research.

Authors:  C Deslauriers; E Bell; N Palmour; B Pike; J Doyon; E Racine
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Matthew P Kirschen; Emmeline Edwards; L R Stanford; Peter Bandettini; Mildred K Cho; Paul J Ford; Gary H Glover; Jennifer Kulynych; Ruth Macklin; Daniel B Michael; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Bradley; Leslie A Curry; Kelly J Devers
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Italian neuroscientists are ready to start the debate.

Authors:  Fiorenzo Conti; Gilberto Corbellini
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 6.  What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI.

Authors:  Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Neuroscientists need neuroethics teaching.

Authors:  Barbara J Sahakian; Sharon Morein-Zamir
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Christine Harris; Piotr Winkielman; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

Review 9.  Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research.

Authors:  Judy Illes; Mary Anne Moser; Jennifer B McCormick; Eric Racine; Sandra Blakeslee; Arthur Caplan; Erika Check Hayden; Jay Ingram; Tiffany Lohwater; Peter McKnight; Christie Nicholson; Anthony Phillips; Kevin D Sauvé; Elaine Snell; Samuel Weiss
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Ji Meng Loh; Lauren Y Atlas; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  5 in total

1.  Active learning in a neuroethics course positively impacts moral judgment development in undergraduates.

Authors:  Desiree Abu-Odeh; Derek Dziobek; Nathalia Torres Jimenez; Christopher Barbey; Janet M Dubinsky
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Data sharing in neuroimaging research.

Authors:  Jean-Baptiste Poline; Janis L Breeze; Satrajit Ghosh; Krzysztof Gorgolewski; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Michael Hanke; Christian Haselgrove; Karl G Helmer; David B Keator; Daniel S Marcus; Russell A Poldrack; Yannick Schwartz; John Ashburner; David N Kennedy
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 4.081

3.  Smart homes, private homes? An empirical study of technology researchers' perceptions of ethical issues in developing smart-home health technologies.

Authors:  Giles Birchley; Richard Huxtable; Madeleine Murtagh; Ruud Ter Meulen; Peter Flach; Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Data sharing and publishing in the field of neuroimaging.

Authors:  Janis L Breeze; Jean-Baptiste Poline; David N Kennedy
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 6.524

5.  The state of the art in organizational cognitive neuroscience: the therapeutic gap and possible implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Carl Senior; Nick Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.