Literature DB >> 21626209

Intrinsic and inducible resistance to hydrogen peroxide in Bifidobacterium species.

T S Oberg1, J L Steele, S C Ingham, V V Smeianov, E P Briczinski, A Abdalla, J R Broadbent.   

Abstract

Interest in, and use of, bifidobacteria as a probiotic delivered in functional foods has increased dramatically in recent years. As a result of their anaerobic nature, oxidative stress can pose a major challenge to maintaining viability of bifidobacteria during functional food storage. To better understand the oxidative stress response in two industrially important bifidobacteria species, we examined the response of three strains of B. longum and three strains of B. animalis subsp. lactis to hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂). Each strain was exposed to a range of H₂O₂ concentrations (0-10 mM) to evaluate and compare intrinsic resistance to H₂O₂. Next, strains were tested for the presence of an inducible oxidative stress response by exposure to a sublethal H₂O₂ concentration for 20 or 60 min followed by challenge at a lethal H₂O₂ concentration. Results showed B. longum subsp. infantis ATCC 15697 had the highest level of intrinsic H₂O₂ resistance of all strains tested and B. animalis subsp. lactis BL-04 had the highest resistance among B. lactis strains. Inducible H₂O₂ resistance was detected in four strains, B. longum NCC2705, B. longum D2957, B. lactis RH-1, and B. lactis BL-04. Other strains showed either no difference or increased sensitivity to H₂O₂ after induction treatments. These data indicate that intrinsic and inducible resistance to hydrogen peroxide is strain specific in B. longum and B. lactis and suggest that for some strains, sublethal H₂O₂ treatments might help increase cell resistance to oxidative damage during production and storage of probiotic-containing foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21626209     DOI: 10.1007/s10295-011-0983-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 1367-5435            Impact factor:   3.346


  37 in total

Review 1.  Probiotic bacteria: selective enumeration and survival in dairy foods.

Authors:  N P Shah
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  The clpB gene of Bifidobacterium breve UCC 2003: transcriptional analysis and first insights into stress induction.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; John G Kenny; Ziding Zhang; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 3.  General stress response of Bacillus subtilis and other bacteria.

Authors:  M Hecker; U Völker
Journal:  Adv Microb Physiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.517

Review 4.  Microbiological and technological aspects of milks fermented by bifidobacteria.

Authors:  A Y Tamime; V M Marshall; R K Robinson
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.904

5.  The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum reflects its adaptation to the human gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Mark A Schell; Maria Karmirantzou; Berend Snel; David Vilanova; Bernard Berger; Gabriella Pessi; Marie-Camille Zwahlen; Frank Desiere; Peer Bork; Michele Delley; R David Pridmore; Fabrizio Arigoni
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Basic features of the stress response in three species of bifidobacteria: B. longum, B. adolescentis, and B. breve.

Authors:  G Schmidt; R Zink
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2000-04-10       Impact factor: 5.277

7.  Selection of acid tolerant bifidobacteria and evidence for a low-pH-inducible acid tolerance response in Bifidobacterium longum.

Authors:  Noritoshi Takahashi; Jin-Zhong Xiao; Kazuhiro Miyaji; Tomoko Yaeshiima; Akinori Hiramatsu; Keiji Iwatsuki; Sadayuki Kokubo; Akiyoshi Hosono
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.904

Review 8.  Stress responses in lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Maarten van de Guchte; Pascale Serror; Christian Chervaux; Tamara Smokvina; Stanislav D Ehrlich; Emmanuelle Maguin
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.271

9.  Characterization of the groEL and groES loci in Bifidobacterium breve UCC 2003: genetic, transcriptional, and phylogenetic analyses.

Authors:  Marco Ventura; Carlos Canchaya; Ralf Zink; Gerald F Fitzgerald; Douwe van Sinderen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Employment of stressful conditions during culture production to enhance subsequent cold- and acid-tolerance of bifidobacteria.

Authors:  J E Maus; S C Ingham
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  10 in total

1.  Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis ATCC 27673 is a genomically unique strain within its conserved subspecies.

Authors:  Joseph R Loquasto; Rodolphe Barrangou; Edward G Dudley; Buffy Stahl; Chun Chen; Robert F Roberts
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Identification of plasmalogens in the cytoplasmic membrane of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis.

Authors:  Taylor S Oberg; Robert E Ward; James L Steele; Jeff R Broadbent
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Co-operative inhibitory effects of hydrogen peroxide and iodine against bacterial and yeast species.

Authors:  Elena I Zubko; Mikhajlo K Zubko
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2013-07-15

4.  Genetic and physiological responses of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis to hydrogen peroxide stress.

Authors:  Taylor S Oberg; Robert E Ward; James L Steele; Jeff R Broadbent
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 5.  International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Probiotics.

Authors:  Ralf Jäger; Alex E Mohr; Katie C Carpenter; Chad M Kerksick; Martin Purpura; Adel Moussa; Jeremy R Townsend; Manfred Lamprecht; Nicholas P West; Katherine Black; Michael Gleeson; David B Pyne; Shawn D Wells; Shawn M Arent; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Richard B Kreider; Bill I Campbell; Laurent Bannock; Jonathan Scheiman; Craig J Wissent; Marco Pane; Douglas S Kalman; Jamie N Pugh; Jessica A Ter Haar; Jose Antonio
Journal:  J Int Soc Sports Nutr       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Genome-Wide Assessment of Stress-Associated Genes in Bifidobacteria.

Authors:  Marie Schöpping; Tammi Vesth; Kristian Jensen; Carl Johan Franzén; Ahmad A Zeidan
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Ribonucleotide Reductases from Bifidobacteria Contain Multiple Conserved Indels Distinguishing Them from All Other Organisms: In Silico Analysis of the Possible Role of a 43 aa Bifidobacteria-Specific Insert in the Class III RNR Homolog.

Authors:  Seema Alnajar; Bijendra Khadka; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Bifidobacterium animalis subspecies lactis engineered to produce mycosporin-like amino acids in colorectal cancer prevention.

Authors:  Hüseyin Sancar Bozkurt; Eamonn Mm Quigley; Banu Kara
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2019-01-22

9.  Development of omics-based protocols for the microbiological characterization of multi-strain formulations marketed as probiotics: the case of VSL#3.

Authors:  Diego Mora; Rossella Filardi; Stefania Arioli; Sjef Boeren; Steven Aalvink; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 5.813

10.  Effects of Probiotics on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Factors in Petrochemical Workers: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Authors:  Ali Akbar Mohammadi; Shima Jazayeri; Kianoush Khosravi-Darani; Zahra Solati; Nakisa Mohammadpour; Zatollah Asemi; Zohre Adab; Mahmoud Djalali; Mehdi Tehrani-Doost; Mostafa Hosseini; Shahryar Eghtesadi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2015-09-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.