The main purpose of the present study is to envisage the molecular mechanism of inhibitory action of dehydrocostuslactone (DCE) and costunolide (CS), two naturally occurring sesquiterpene lactones, towards the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). We report that, in human THP-1 cell line, they inhibit IL-6-elicited tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 and its DNA binding activity with EC(50) of 10 µM with concomitant down-regulation of the phosphorylation of the tyrosine Janus kinases JAK1, JAK2 and Tyk2. Furthermore, these compounds that contain an α-β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety and function as potent Michael reaction acceptor, induce a rapid drop in intracellular glutathione (GSH) concentration by direct interaction with it, thereby triggering S-glutathionylation of STAT3. Dehydrocostunolide (HCS), the reduced form of CS lacking only the α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group, fails to exert any inhibitory action. Finally, the glutathione ethylene ester (GEE), the cell permeable GSH form, reverts the inhibitory action of DCE and CS on STAT3 tyrosine phosphorylation. We conclude that these two sesquiterpene lactones are able to induce redox-dependent post-translational modification of cysteine residues of STAT3 protein in order to regulate its function.
The main purpose of the present study is to envisage the molecular mechanism of inhibitory action of dehydrocostuslactone (DCE) and costunolide (CS), two naturally occurring sesquiterpene lactones, towards the activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3). We report that, in humanTHP-1 cell line, they inhibit IL-6-elicited tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 and its DNA binding activity with EC(50) of 10 µM with concomitant down-regulation of the phosphorylation of the tyrosine Janus kinases JAK1, JAK2 and Tyk2. Furthermore, these compounds that contain an α-β-unsaturated carbonyl moiety and function as potent Michael reaction acceptor, induce a rapid drop in intracellular glutathione (GSH) concentration by direct interaction with it, thereby triggering S-glutathionylation of STAT3. Dehydrocostunolide (HCS), the reduced form of CS lacking only the α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group, fails to exert any inhibitory action. Finally, the glutathione ethylene ester (GEE), the cell permeable GSH form, reverts the inhibitory action of DCE and CS on STAT3tyrosine phosphorylation. We conclude that these two sesquiterpene lactones are able to induce redox-dependent post-translational modification of cysteine residues of STAT3 protein in order to regulate its function.
The Janus kinases (JAKs) and signal transducers and activators of transcription
(STATs) pathway is responsible for signal transduction of a large number of
cytokines and growth factors that regulate responses to inflammation or immune
challenge and address the future of cell decision during development and neoplastic
growth [1]. After
the cytokines binding to their cognate receptors, JAK tyrosine kinases, JAK1, JAK2
and Tyk2, are promptly activated and proceed to tyrosine-phosphorylate cytosolic,
latent STATs. The phosphorylated STATs homo- or hetero-dimerize and translocate into
the nucleus to regulate expression of target genes. In addition to tyrosine
phosphorylation, STATs are occasionally phosphorylated on serine residues, located
on their carboxyl-terminal trans-activation domains [2].Seven STATs proteins have been identified so far. In physiological conditions STATs
activation is transient and usually lasts from a few minutes to several hours. This
is assured by a variety of negatively acting events thatblock further activation,
decrease DNA binding or result indephosphorylation of STATs. The final outcome of
cytokine/growth factor stimulation reflects how different cell types can interpret
the complex and often contrasting signals they receive.The pleiotropic cytokine IL-6 activates predominantly STAT3 binding to Gp130 receptor
complex and modulate the expression of genes encoding mediators crucial for the
classic physiological acute phase response and for the apoptotic pathway [3]. Although
tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3 is accompanied by serine phosphorylation in a
variety of cells, the biologic role of serineSTAT3 phosphorylation is
controversial. Some studies suggest that serine phosphorylation enhances
transcriptional activity [4], whereas other reports demonstrate that serine
phosphorylation induces inhibitory activity [5], [6].Although STAT3 activation normally leads to the physiological response, deregulation
of this transduction cascade could lead to the tissue damage and directly or
indirectly could be involved in different pathologies. A number of
inflammation-correlated diseases such as Crohn's disease, pleurisy, psoriasis
etc. are characterized by hyperactivationof STAT3 [7], [8], [9]. Furthermore STAT3 is
considered as an oncoprotein and its constitutive activation is reported in numerous
solid and haematological tumours [10]. Therefore, any treatment counteracting the
hyper-expression or -activation of STAT3 has been considered as a new strategy to
treat these world-widely increasing pathologies [11], [12]. In this context, the use of
naturally occurring compounds, especially those present in plants, has recently
attracted the attention of many researchers. We recently reported that green tea
extract or epigallocatechin-3-gallate, the main green tea component, and hyperforin
present in St. John Wort extract exert a strong inhibitory action on
IFN-γ-elicited STAT1 activation, indicating the possibility of their use in the
prevention/therapy against stroke and diabetes, respectively [13], [14], [15].The cellular redox state is a crucial mediator of multiple metabolic, signalling and
transcriptional processes in cells, and a fine balance between oxidizing and
reducing conditions is essential for normal function and survival of cells [16]. The
disturbance in the glutathione/glutathione disulphide couple (GSH/GSSG) homeostasis
is implicated in the ethiology and/or progression of a number of human diseases,
including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, cystic fibrosis etc. [17]. GSH
deficiency manifests itself largely through an increased susceptibility to oxidative
stress, and the resulting damage is a key step in the onset and progression of many
disease states. Conversely, elevated GSH levels generally increase antioxidant
capacity and resistance to oxidative stress, and this is observed in many types of
cancer cells. Oxidative stress may cause reversible and/or irreversible oxidative
modifications on sensitive proteins that may lead to a change in their activity or
function [18].
Mild oxidative stress induces reversible modifications, including the
glutathionylation of cysteine residues. This reaction may have a dual role:
protection from irreversible damage and modulation of protein function. Conversely,
excessive oxidative stress triggers irreversible modification of thiolic groups of
proteins generally associated with permanent loss of function, misfolding and
aggregation [19].
Recent report indicates that STAT3 can be glutathionylated under oxidative
conditions with concomitant inhibition of its phosphorylation, thus suggesting the
possible cross-talk between these two post-translational reactions [20].Dehydrocostuslactone (DCE) and costunolide (CS), two sesquiterpene lactones present
in a number of plants such as Laurusnobilis L., Magnolia sieboldii L. and
Sassureacustus L., exhibit various biological and immunological
activity, including antinflammatory and antifungal one [21], [22]. It has also been reported the
proapoptotic effect of these compounds in different humancancer cells [23], [24], [25], [26]. These compounds
exert an inhibitory action on NF-κB pathway [27], [28], induce Nfr2 activation [29], [30] and activate many
MAP kinases such as JNK, ERK2 and P38 [23]. Moreover, DCE inhibits the constitutive STAT3 activation
through an increase in suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS)-1 and (SOCS)-3
expression [31].
However, the main target of the molecular mechanism of their biological action has
not been clarified so far.In the present study we hypothesized that decrease in the intracellular GSH level,
induced by DCE and CS, triggers the inhibition of STAT3tyrosine phosphorylation
mediated by its glutathionylation. To evaluate this, we examined the effect of two
terpenes on the activation of STAT3 induced by IL-6 in human acute monocyticleukemia
THP-1 cells. We present data indicating the direct involvement of GSH deficiency in
the inhibition of STAT3 pathway through the glutathionylation of STAT3.
Materials and Methods
Chemicals
All chemicals used throughout the present study were of the highest analytical
grade, purchased from Sigma Chemical Company, Milan, Italy, unless otherwise
specified. RPMI 1640 medium, Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM)
and fetal bovine (FBS) serum were obtained from Lonza, Verviers, BE. DCE and CS
(Figure 1) were
purchased from PhytoLab GmbH & Co, Vestenbergsgreuth, Germany.
Figure 1
Structure of Dehydrocostuslactone (DCE), Costunolide (CS) and
Dehydrocostunolide (HCS).
The α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group is marked with a dotted
circle.
Structure of Dehydrocostuslactone (DCE), Costunolide (CS) and
Dehydrocostunolide (HCS).
The α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group is marked with a dotted
circle.Rabbit anti-phospho-Tyr705STAT3, anti-phospho-Ser727STAT3,
anti-phospho-Tyr1054/55TyK2 and anti-JAK2 were purchased from
Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA; rabbit
anti-phospho-Tyr1022/1023JAK1 and
anti-phospho-Tyr1007/1008JAK2 antibodies were obtained from
Millipore, Bedford, MA; rabbit anti-SOCS-3 was from ImmunoBiological
Laboratories, Tokyo, Japan; rabbit anti-STAT3, anti-Tyk2 and anti-JAK1
antibodies werefrom Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA.
Cell culture
Human monocyticleukemia THP-1 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas,
VA) were cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 UI/ml
penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin and 40 µg/ml gentamycin in a
5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Human cervical carcinoma HeLa
cells (American Type Culture Collection) and humancolorectal adenocarcinoma
DLD-1 cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in DMEM
supplemented with 10% FBS under the same conditions.
Construction of Tyk2
Tyk2 was amplified by PCR with the following primer sets:5′-CG
(sense)5′-AC
(antisense).PCR primers included 5′-NotI, 5′-EcoRI restriction sites (boldface)
to aid cloning. PCR products were digested completely with NotI, EcoRI,
gel-purified, and insert into the identical sites of pcDNA 3.0 to give
Tyk2-pcDNA 3.0. The nucleotide sequence of this expression plasmid was verified
by DNA sequencing.
Cells transfection
For a transient transfection, HeLa cells were plated into 60-mm plates at a
density of 8×105 in DMEM without antibiotics. After 18 hours,
the DMEM was replaced with the serum-reduced medium OPTI-MEM (Invitrogen,
Carlsbad, CA) and the cells were transfected with 1 µg Tyk2-pcDNA 3.0
expression vector and 10 µllipofectamine 2000 according to the
manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After 24 hours, the
cells were treated with IL-6 (20 ng/ml) for 5 minutes in order to achieve Tyk2
activation. Effect of two terpenes on TyK2 activation was examined by treating
cells for 30 minutes before IL-6 stimulation. The cells were harvested and used
for Western blot analysis.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay-EMSA
3×106 THP-1 or DLD-1 cells, after 4 hours starvation, were
treated with IL-6 (20 ng/ml) for 15 minutes in order to achieve STAT3
activation. Effect of two terpenes on STAT3 activation was examined by treating
cells for 30 minutes before IL-6 stimulation. Nuclear extracts of THP-1 cells
were prepared according to Osborn et al. [32] in the presence of 10
µg/ml leupeptin, 5 µg/ml antipain, 5 µg/ml pepstatin, and 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. Eight micrograms of nuclear extract were
incubated with 2–5×104 cpm of 32P-labeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides, the consensus STAT3 DNA binding site
(sis-inducible factor-binding recognition element, SIE/m67) from the c-fos
promoter (5′-gtcgaCATTTCCCGTAAATCg-3′), in a 15 µl
reaction mixture containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 m
Mdithiothreitol, 0.1 mM EDTA, 2 µg of poly(dI-dC), 1 µg of salmon
sperm DNA, and 10% glycerol. Products were fractionated on a
non-denaturing 5% polyacrylamidegel. The gels were dried and
autoradiographed and the intensity of hybridization was quantified using the
public domain NIH Image 1.61 program (developed at the U.S. National Institutes
of Health and available on http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/). Supershift assay was
performed by incubating the nuclear extracts in a binding buffer for 1 hour at
4°C with 1 µl of antibody before addition of labelled
oligonucleotide.
Western blot analysis
Cells, treated as described above, were homogenized at 4°C in 20 mM HEPES, pH
7.4, containing 420 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 1% Nonidet-P40
(NP-40), 20% glycerol, protease cocktail inhibitors (GE Healthcare,
Amersham Place, UK) and phosphatase cocktail inhibitors. Aliquots of the cell
lysate (40 µg total protein/lane) were loaded on 7.5%
SDS-polyacrylamide gels. Electrophoresis was performed at 100 V with a running
buffer containing 0.25 M TrisHCl, pH 8.3, 1.92 M glycine, and 1% SDS. The
resolved protein were electroblotted onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon P,
Millipore, Bedford MA) and incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated
primary antibodies. After washing, membraneswere developed using anti-rabbit or
anti-mouse IgG peroxidase-conjugated antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and
chemiluminescent detection system (Immun-Star™ WesternC™ Kit,
Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Blotted proteins were detected and quantified using the
ChemiDoc XRS Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). After stripping, membranes
were re-hybridized with the correspondent antibodies.
GSH and GSSG recycling assay
The intracellular oxidized and reduced glutathione were
determinedspectrophotometrically using the GSH recycling method as previously
described [33]. Briefly, treated and untreated cells werelysed by
freezing and thawing in 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.5, containing 5 mM
EDTA, (KPE buffer) and after centrifugation at 16,000 rpm for 10 minutes, total
protein concentration was determined by using Bradford method [34]. The
supernatant was removed and deproteinized with 5% trichloroacetic acid
(TCA). For total GSH measurement (GSH+GSSG), sample aliquot of TCA extract
was incubated in 1 ml of KPE buffer containing 0.6 mM
5,5′-dithio-bis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) and 1 U/ml GSH reductase. The
reaction was startedby the addition of 0.2 mM NADPH and the increase in
absorbance at 412 nm was measured. The amount of total GSH was determined by
comparison with GSH standard curve. For the determination of GSSG, the same DTNB
recycling assay was performed after using 2-vinylpiyridine to remove the reduced
GSH. Briefly, 2 µl of 2-vinylpiyridine and 4 µl of triethanolamine
were mixed with 100 µl of TCA extract, followed by incubation in the dark
at room temperature for 1 h before initiation of recycling assay. The increment
in absorbance was converted to GSSG concentration using a GSSG standard curve.
The GSH levels were calculated by subtracting the amount of GSSG formed from
total GSH content obtained. The values were expressed as nmols GSH/mg
protein.
Detection of intracellular reactive oxigen species (ROS)
THP-1 cells resuspended in HBSS (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at
5×105/mL were loaded with 2.5 µM of the
membrane-permeable probe
5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate
acetyl ester (CM-H2DCFDA, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) for 1 hour at
37°C. They were then washed with HBSS and stimulated with 6, 12, 25 µM
DCE or CS or 500 µM diamide (positive control) and placed back into the
incubator. After 30 minutes or 1 hour they were washed and resuspended in PBS.
ROS generation was evaluated in flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; Becton Dickinson,
San Jose, CA) by measuring the green fluorescence signal of DCF, the oxidation
product of CM-H2DCFDA by free radicals. The emitted fluorescence was
detected in Fl-1 using a 530/30 nm band-pass optical filter. FlowJo 8.8.2
software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR) was used to analyze data.
HPLC analysis
10 µM DCE and CS were incubated with 5, 25 and 100 mM GSH in RPMI medium
without FBS, at 37°C for 30 minutes and analysed by HPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto,
JP).The reaction mixtures were charged on Mightysil RP-18 GP reverse-phase column,
(150 mm×4.6 mm, Kanto Chemical, Tokyo, JP) maintained at 35°C and
eluted with 35% acetonitrile at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The elution
profiles were monitored at 215 nm by UV detector. Retention times of DCE and CS
peaks were 7.3 and 8.1 minutes, respectively.
Immunoprecipitation and identification of glutathioylated proteins
Cells were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1%
(wt/vol)Nonidet P-40, 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 100 mM NaF, 1 mM
Na3VO4) supplemented with protease cocktail inhibitor
for 15 minutes on ice with occasional vortexing. Equal amounts of proteins from
the clarified cell lysates were incubated overnightat 4°C with rotation in
the presence of 2 µg STAT3 antibody. The immune complexes were collectedby
addition of protein A sepharose (Millipore Corp.), washed extensively, eluted in
a non-reducing sample buffer (62.5 mM TrisHCl, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol,
5% SDS, 0.05% bromophenol blue) and separated on a 5%
SDS–polyacrylamide gel. After electrophoresis, proteins were transferred
to a PVDF membrane and nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation in
3% BSA diluted in TBST. Membranes were then probed with primary
monoclonal antibodies against GSH (ViroGen, Watertown, MA) or STAT3. After
washing, blots were incubated with anti-rabbit IgG peroxidase-conjugated
antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). Protein-antibody reactions were detected
with chemiluminescent detection system (Immun-Star™ WesternC™ Kit,
Bio-Rad). The S-glutathionylated proteins on membranes were
detected and quantified using the ChemiDoc XRS Imaging System (Bio Rad).
Statistical analysis
Data are reported as means ± SD of four independent experiments
(n = 4); statistical analyses were performed using
Student's t test. Differences were considered significant
whenp≤0.05.
Results
DCE and CS exert an inhibitory action on IL-6-elicited STAT3 in THP-1
cells
In order to evaluate the effect of DCE and CS on STAT3 signalling pathway, EMSA
and Western blot analysis were performed in THP-1 cells treated with IL-6 (20
ng/ml) for 15 minutes. IL-6 increased predominantly the STAT3 DNA-binding
activity, as indicated by EMSA/supershift experiment with anti-STAT3 antibody in
line with previous report (Figure
2a). The administration of DCE and CS up to 25 µM 30 minutes
before IL-6 treatment was able to inhibit in a concentration-dependent manner
STAT3 DNA-binding activity with estimated EC50 value of 10 µM.
(Figure 2a).
Figure 2
Effect of DCE and CS on IL-6-elicited STAT3 activation in THP-1
cells.
(a) EMSA shows that DCE and CS dose-dependently decrease DNA-binding
activity of STAT3 activated by 20 ng/ml IL6 in THP-1 cells. In the
insert EMSA/supershift indicates that IL-6 induces prevalently the
activation of STAT3. (b) Western Blot analysis shows that DCE and CS
dose-dependently decrease tyrosine705 phosphorylation of
STAT3 induced by 20 ng/ml IL-6 in THP-1 cells without changing the total
amount of STAT3. Furthermore the sesquiterpens don't affect
serine727 phosphorylation. The gels are representative of
four independent experiments.
Effect of DCE and CS on IL-6-elicited STAT3 activation in THP-1
cells.
(a) EMSA shows that DCE and CS dose-dependently decrease DNA-binding
activity of STAT3 activated by 20 ng/ml IL6 in THP-1 cells. In the
insert EMSA/supershift indicates that IL-6 induces prevalently the
activation of STAT3. (b) Western Blot analysis shows that DCE and CS
dose-dependently decrease tyrosine705 phosphorylation of
STAT3 induced by 20 ng/ml IL-6 in THP-1 cells without changing the total
amount of STAT3. Furthermore the sesquiterpens don't affect
serine727 phosphorylation. The gels are representative of
four independent experiments.One of the critical steps leading to the activation of STAT3 is its
phosphorylation on specific tyrosine residue and successive translocation into
the nucleus. In line with above described data, Western Blot analysis showed
that DCE and CS decreased, in a dose-dependent manner, IL-6-induced
tyrosine705 phosphorylation of cytosolic STAT3 without affecting
the total amount of STAT3 protein (Figure 2b). In addition to tyrosine phosphorylation, STAT3 is also
phosphorylated on serine727 residue; as for others hematological cell
line [35], also in THP-1 cells STAT3 is constitutively
phosphorylated on serine residue and IL-6 only slightly induced it. DCE as well
as CS were not able to modulate it (Figure 2b).DCE and CS were also able to down modulate IL-6 dependent-tyrosine
phosphorylation of STAT3 and its DNA binding activity in DLD-1 cell line (Figure
S1).
DCE and CS are able to inhibit IL-6-elicited JAKs phosphorylation
The ability of DCE and CS to suppress the tyrosine phosphorylation of STAT3
suggests that these compounds may interfere with the function of upstream
tyrosine kinases JAKs associated to the cytoplasmic portion of IL-6-receptor
[36], [37]. Thus,
we determined the effect of these terpenes on IL-6–induce tyrosine
phosphorylation of JAK1 and JAK2 in THP-1 cells by Western Blot using antibodies
that specifically recognizes phospho-Tyr1022/1023JAK1 and
phospho-Tyr1007/1008JAK2. IL-6 induced the
tyrosine-phosphorylation of both JAK1 and JAK2 in 10 minutes; notably,
pre-treatment with 6–25 µM DCE or CS for 30 minutes resulted in
almost complete dephosphorylation of both kinases. No change in total JAKs
levels was observed (Figure
3a). Similar results were obtained in DLD-1 cell line (Figure S1).
In order to analyse the effect of these terpenes on
tyrosine1054/1055-phosphorylation of Tyk2, we used HeLa cell line
transfected with Tyk2 expression plasmid. Western blot analysis showed that
6–25 µM DCE or CS induced almost complete dephosphorylation of
IL-6-elicited Tyk2 in 30 minutes (Figure 3b).
Figure 3
Effect of DCE and CS on tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK tyrosine
kinases.
Western Blot analysis shows that DCE and CS
dose-dependentlydecreasetyrosine1022/1023 phosphorylation
of JAK1 and tyrosine1007/1008 phosphorylation of JAK2 in
THP-1 cells (a) and dose-dependently
decreasetyrosine1054/1055 phosphorylation of Tyk2 in HeLa
cells transiently transfected with Tyk2-pcDNA 3.0 (b). The compounds
don't change the total amount of the corresponding
non-phosphorylated proteins. The gelsarerepresentatives of four
experiments performed separately.
Effect of DCE and CS on tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK tyrosine
kinases.
Western Blot analysis shows that DCE and CS
dose-dependentlydecreasetyrosine1022/1023 phosphorylation
of JAK1 and tyrosine1007/1008 phosphorylation of JAK2 in
THP-1 cells (a) and dose-dependently
decreasetyrosine1054/1055 phosphorylation of Tyk2 in HeLa
cells transiently transfected with Tyk2-pcDNA 3.0 (b). The compounds
don't change the total amount of the corresponding
non-phosphorylated proteins. The gelsarerepresentatives of four
experiments performed separately.Previous report described the inhibitory effect of DCE on constitutive STAT3
activation mediated by an increase in suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS)
expression [31].
Treatment of THP-1 cells with 6–25 µM DCE or CS for 30 minutes to 1
hour had no impact on SOCS-3 expression (data not shown).
Inhibition of the IL-6-elicited phosphorylation of STAT3 by DCE and CS is
triggered by the drop in intracellular GSH level
In order to envisage the molecular mechanism of the inhibitory action of DCE and
CS on STAT3 phosphorylation, we further hypothesized that the change in
intracellular GSH level may play a critical role.Spectrophotometric analysis measuring GSH and GSSG concentrations in THP-1 cells
showed that under normal conditions the amounts of GSH (13±0.8 nmoles/mg
protein) are far higher than those of GSSG (0.09±0.02 nmoles/mg protein)
and that DCE and CS induced dose- and time-dependently the drop in GSH
concentration, only slightly affecting GSSG level (Figure 4). The rapid drop in intracellular
GSH amount is timely compatible with the inhibition of STAT3
phosphorylation.
Figure 4
DCE and CS decrease intracellular GSH level in THP-1 cells.
DCE and CS time- and dose-dependently induce the drop in cellular GSH
content without significantly affecting the amounts of GSSG. Data are
presented as means ± SD of results from four independent
experiments. Significant difference compared to control group
(*p≤0.05).
DCE and CS decrease intracellular GSH level in THP-1 cells.
DCE and CS time- and dose-dependently induce the drop in cellular GSH
content without significantly affecting the amounts of GSSG. Data are
presented as means ± SD of results from four independent
experiments. Significant difference compared to control group
(*p≤0.05).To evaluate whether this event is crucial in the modulation of STAT3 pathway,
THP-1 cells were pre-treated overnight with 1 mM glutathione monoethyl ester
(GEE), the cell permeable GSH, and thereafter with the two sesquiterpenelactones up to 25 µM for 30 minutes before IL-6 administration. Western
blot analysis showed that GEE reverts tyrosine-phosphorylation of STAT3 and this
effect is correlated with the administrated sesquiterpenes' concentration
(Figure 5). Also in
DLD-1 cells, this post-translational modification is dependent on intracellular
GSH concentration (Figure S1).
Figure 5
GEE reverts the inhibitory action of DCE and CS on the IL-6-elicited
phosphorylation of STAT3.
(a) Western Blot analysis shows that inhibitory action of DCE and CS on
IL-6 induced STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation is reverted by 1 mM
glutathione monoethyl ester (GEE). The total amount of STAT3 is not
affected during the experiments. The gels are representative of four
experiments performed separately.
GEE reverts the inhibitory action of DCE and CS on the IL-6-elicited
phosphorylation of STAT3.
(a) Western Blot analysis shows that inhibitory action of DCE and CS on
IL-6 induced STAT3Tyr705 phosphorylation is reverted by 1 mM
glutathione monoethyl ester (GEE). The total amount of STAT3 is not
affected during the experiments. The gels are representative of four
experiments performed separately.All these data further suggest the critical role played by intracellular GSH
level in regulating IL-6-elicited-STAT3 activation.
DCE and CS induce ROS production
THP-1 cells loaded with CM-H2DCFDA and treated with DCE or CS
exhibited a clear fluorescence increase as respect to untreated sample. This
data is consistent with an enhancement of intracellular ROS. Figure 6 shows that this
effect is time-dependent but not dose-dependent. Indeed fluorescence intensity
was similar at the different concentrations of the two compounds at the same
time starting from 30 minutes to 1 hour stimulation. Likewise, diamide, a strong
oxidant compound used as positive control, gave a time-dependent effect
(inset).
Figure 6
DCE and CS induce ROS production.
Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular ROS generation. THP-1 cells
loaded with CM-H2DCFDA and treated for 30 minutes (dark gray)
and 1 hour (light gray) with 6, 12 and 25 µM (a) DCE or (b) CS
shows and increment of fluorescence as respect to untreated cells
(white). This increment is time-dependent but not dose-dependent. 500
µM diamide was used as positive control (inset). One
representative experiment out of four is depicted.
DCE and CS induce ROS production.
Flow cytometric analysis of intracellular ROS generation. THP-1 cells
loaded with CM-H2DCFDA and treated for 30 minutes (dark gray)
and 1 hour (light gray) with 6, 12 and 25 µM (a) DCE or (b) CS
shows and increment of fluorescence as respect to untreated cells
(white). This increment is time-dependent but not dose-dependent. 500
µM diamide was used as positive control (inset). One
representative experiment out of four is depicted.
DCE and CS are able to directly interact with GSH
Previous works reported that some sesquiterpene lactones including CS, decrease
the intracellular thiols level, without clear demonstration of the direct bond
formation between them [24], [38].HPLC analysis of the solutions containing the sesquiterpene lactones plus GSH,
prepared as described under Material and
Methods, showed that the amounts of these terpenes decrease in the
presence of increasing concentration of GSH, indicating their direct
interaction(Figure 7a).
These data suggest that the drop in intracellular GSH levels induced by DCE and
CS may be mediated, at least partly, by this interaction.
Figure 7
DCE and CS directly interact with GSH.
(a) HPLC analysis shows that GSH dose-dependently decrease the amounts of
DCE and CS after 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C. (Standard
deviation of date obtained from three independent experiments is shown).
(b) Western Blot analysis shows that HCS, is not able to decrease IL-6
induced STAT3 Tyr705 phosphorylation as CS does in THP-1
cells. The total amounts of STAT3 are not affected during the
experiments. Data are the representatives of four experiments performed
separately. The gels are representative of four experiments performed
separately.
DCE and CS directly interact with GSH.
(a) HPLC analysis shows that GSH dose-dependently decrease the amounts of
DCE and CS after 30 minutes of incubation at 37°C. (Standard
deviation of date obtained from three independent experiments is shown).
(b) Western Blot analysis shows that HCS, is not able to decrease IL-6
induced STAT3Tyr705 phosphorylation as CS does in THP-1
cells. The total amounts of STAT3 are not affected during the
experiments. Data are the representatives of four experiments performed
separately. The gels are representative of four experiments performed
separately.DCE and CS, that contain an α-β-unsatured carbonyl moiety, function as
potent Michael reaction acceptor. To analyze the importance of this group in the
inhibitory action of these sesquiterpene lactones, we examined the effect of
dehydrocostunolide (HCS), the reduced form of CS (Figure 1), on IL-6-elicited STAT3
phosphorylation. Contrary to DCE and CS, HCSfailed to exert any inhibitory
action (Figure 7b).
DCE and CS induce the S-glutathionylation of STAT3 interfering with its
phosphorylation
A recent report describes that the strong oxidant diamide elicited
S-glutathionylation of STAT3 leading to the inhibition of
its tyrosine phosphorylation [20]. This post-translational modification may represent
the mechanism of regulation of STAT3 activity in cells treated with DCE and
CS.As shown in Figure 8, the
anti-glutathione antibody recognizes STAT3 immunoprecipitated proteins in THP-1
cells treated with 12–50 µM DCE and CS as well as with 500 µM
diamide for 30 minutes, suggesting that these two sesquiterpene lactones induce
dose-dependently the glutathionylation of STAT3. The blots exhibited equivalent
STAT3 protein levels in all samples.
Figure 8
Effect of DCE and CS on glutathionylation of STAT3 in THP-1
cells.
Western Blot analysis of immunoprecipitated STAT3 (IP STAT3) shows that
DCE and CS dose-dependently increase the amounts of glutathionylated
STAT3. At 50 µM both lactones induce the same level of STAT3
glutathionylation as that induced by 500 µM diamide, a strong
oxidant. The total amounts of STAT3 are not affecting during the
experiments. The gels are representative of four experiments performed
separately.
Effect of DCE and CS on glutathionylation of STAT3 in THP-1
cells.
Western Blot analysis of immunoprecipitated STAT3 (IP STAT3) shows that
DCE and CS dose-dependently increase the amounts of glutathionylated
STAT3. At 50 µM both lactones induce the same level of STAT3
glutathionylation as that induced by 500 µM diamide, a strong
oxidant. The total amounts of STAT3 are not affecting during the
experiments. The gels are representative of four experiments performed
separately.
Discussion
Receptor-associated JAK family tyrosine kinases, JAK1, JAK2 and Tyk2, plays a crucial
role in the STATs signal transduction pathway activated by a number of cytokines and
growth factors. Following the binding of these ligands to their specific membrane
receptors, JAK kinases associated to cytoplasmic portion of receptors, tyrosine
phosphorylate themselves and successively STAT proteins. Although this signalling
pathway is finely regulated to guarantee the physiological response,
hyper-activation of STATs has often been observed in a number of pathologies,
especially that of STAT3 in cancer and in some inflammatory diseases. Therefore,
attention has recently been paid to the compounds able to modulate STAT3 pathway in
order to alleviate the detrimental effect of its hyper-activation.The present study identifies two structurally related naturally occurring
sesquiterpene lactones, DCE and CS, as inhibitors of IL-6-elicited STAT3
activationin human cell line THP-1 (EC50 = 10
µM) and demonstrates that DCE and CS rapidly suppress cytokine-induced
tyrosine-phosphorylation of JAK1, JAK2 and Tyk2.Previous report described the inhibitory effect of DCE on constitutive STAT3
activation mediated by an increase in SOCS expression [31]. The different proteins targeted
by the same compound may reflect the diverse mode of activation of cytokines-induced
and constitutively activated STAT3. In THP-1 cells, DCE and CS weren't able to
modify the expression of SOCS-3 (data not shown). The rapid STAT3 inhibitory action
showed herein seems to be more compatible with the notion that JAK family proteins,
instead of SOCS-3, are their main target since the inhibition of the phosphorylation
of pre-existing kinases may require far less time than de novo synthesis of SOCS-3
protein.An increasing body of literature evidences underlines the critical involvement of
intracellular redox state in cancer and in inflammation-associated diseases. Under
normal conditions, mammalian cells contain 1–10 mM cytosolic GSH, depending on
cell type and metabolic factors. GSH represents approximatively 95% of total
non proteinthiols and is the main modulator of the cellular redox environment. The
cytoplasmic high ratio between the reduced and oxidized glutathione (GSH/GSSG) is a
key factor in keeping the cysteine residues of intracellular proteins in the reduced
form. The decrease in GSH content, leading to the drop in the cellular redox
potential, is often induced by oxidative stress. In the present study we show that,
in line with above-described notion, in THP-1 cells GSH content is far higher than
GSSG and that DCE and CS dose-dependently induce the consistent drop in
intracellular GSH level without significantly affecting GSSG content (Figure 4). The drop in GSH content
is timely compatible with the data on rapid inhibition of STAT3 phosphorylation by
these compounds (Figure 4 and
2). The decrease in GSH
concentration may be due to their ability both to generate oxygen species (ROS)
[25], [26] and to interact
with GSH. Data presented in Figure
6 show that DCE and CS induce time-dependent but not dose-dependent ROS
production in THP-1 cells, suggesting that the drop in GSH content induced by these
two compounds maybe due, at least in part, to their capacity to increase ROS
production, in line with literature evidences [25], [26]. Results in Figure 7a furthermore indicate that DCE and CS
are also able to directly interact with GSH. Since this interaction is shown to be
highly efficient under our experimental conditions, it is supposed that two lactones
elicit the rapid drop in the intracellular GSH content mainly through their capacity
to interact with it.The direct interaction between DCE or CS and GSH may be chemically mediated by the
α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group present in their moiety (Figure 1), as described for others sesquiterpenelactones [39],
[40]. This
structural element may react with nucleophiles, such as cysteinesulfhydryl groups
of cytosolic proteins, by a Michael-type addition, eventually leading to a mild
electrophilic stress. Indeed, HCS, a structural analogue of CS lacking only the
α-β-unsaturated carbonyl group (Figure 1), has failed to exert inhibitory action toward STAT3tyrosine
phosphorylation (Figure 7b),
indicating that this terpenes' unsaturation may play a pivotal role in its
biochemical activity. Furthermore, glutathione monoethyl ester (GEE), cell permeable
form of GSH, reverts the inhibitory effect of these two sesquiterpene lactones on
STAT3 phosphorylation (Figure
5), suggesting that their action is strictly correlated to the decrease in
intracellular GSH concentration.The disturbance in the GSH/GSSG homeostasis is implicated in the induction of
reversibileS-glutathionylation of cysteine residues of
sensitive proteins [18], [19]. Recently, STAT3 has been shown to be
S-glutathionylated with concomitant loss of its phosphorylation in
HepG2 cells treated with diamide, a strong oxidant compound, pointing out that this
signal transcription factor is susceptible to redox regulation [20].The present study showed that DCE and CS induce rapid
S-glutathionylation of STAT3 with concomitant decrease in STAT3tyrosine phosphorylation (Figure
8 and 2b). Since the
S-glutathionylation of STAT3 induced by them is comparable to
that induced by the strong oxidant, diamide [20] and the inhibition of STAT3
phosphorylation is reverted when cells are incubated with GEE (Figure 5), S-glutathionylation
of STAT3 is likely to be triggered by increased oxidative stress induced by the
decrease in GSH content. Although data presented in this study did not indicate the
involvement of GSSG in this scenario due principally to the very low intracellular
level of GSSG (Figure 4), its
critical role in the glutathionylation of STAT3 cannot be excluded. To our
knowledge, S-glutathionylation of STAT3 induced by naturally
occurring phytocompounds has never been described so far.We conclude that DCE and CS induce time- and dose-dependent drop in intracellular GSH
content and consequently inhibit the tyrosine-phosphorylation of STAT3 in cells
treated with IL-6. Enhanced oxidative pressure elicited either by direct interaction
with GSH or by ROS generation may trigger an efficient STAT3
S-glutathionylation with concomitant decrease in tyrosine705
phosphorylation of STAT3. Dual action on STAT3 activation triggered, on the one
hand, by the inhibition of JAKs catalytic activity that alone may lead to the
decrease in STAT3 phosphorylation and, on the other hand, by
S-glutathionylation of STAT3 that may lead to further interference
on STAT3 phosphorylation seems to be compatible with an efficient action of DCE and
CS.Finally, considering the recent notion that STAT3 is a promising drug target in
cancer prevention and/or therapy, the present work provides a base for the further
structure/function study necessary for the future design/synthesis of DCE and
CS-related compounds with stronger activity.Effect of DCE and CS on STAT3 activation in DLD-1 cells. (a)
EMSA shows that DCE and CS dose-dependently decrease DNA-binding activity of
STAT3 activated by 20 ng/ml IL6 in DLD-1 cells. (b) Western Blot analysis
shows that DCE and CS dose-dependently decrease tyrosine705
phosphorylation of STAT3 induced by 20 ng/ml IL-6 in DLD-1 cells without
changing the total amount of STAT3. (c) DCE and CS slightly decrease
tyrosine1022/1023 phosphorylation of JAK1 and
tyrosine1007/1008 phosphorylation of JAK2 in DLD-1 cells. (d)
Western Blot analysis shows that inhibitory action of DCE and CS on IL-6
induced STAT3Tyr705 phosphorylation is reverted by 1 mM
glutathione monoethyl ester (GEE). The total amount of STAT3 is not affected
during the experiments.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Alessandra Carcereri de Prati; Anna Rosa Ciampa; Elisabetta Cavalieri; Raffaela Zaffini; Elena Darra; Marta Menegazzi; Hisanori Suzuki; Sofia Mariotto Journal: Curr Med Chem Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Paul A Townsend; Tiziano M Scarabelli; Evasio Pasini; Gianluca Gitti; Marta Menegazzi; Hisanori Suzuki; Richard A Knight; David S Latchman; Anastasis Stephanou Journal: FASEB J Date: 2004-08-19 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Mazen Kurdi; Vidhya Sivakumaran; Roy J Duhé; Miguel A Aon; Nazareno Paolocci; George W Booz Journal: Int J Biochem Cell Biol Date: 2012-08-22 Impact factor: 5.085
Authors: Il Je Cho; Jae Kwang Kim; Eun Ok Kim; Sang Mi Park; Sang Chan Kim; Sung Hwan Ki; Sae Kwang Ku Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-04-29 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Carlos Zgheib; Mazen Kurdi; Fouad A Zouein; Barak W Gunter; Brian A Stanley; Joe Zgheib; Damian G Romero; S Bruce King; Nazareno Paolocci; George W Booz Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-15 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Muhammad Khan; Ting Li; Muhammad Khalil Ahmad Khan; Azhar Rasul; Faisal Nawaz; Meiyan Sun; Yongchen Zheng; Tonghui Ma Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2012-12-27 Impact factor: 3.411