| Literature DB >> 21625547 |
Hiroki Sugiyama1, Kazufumi Nakamura, Hiroshi Morita, Satoshi Akagi, Yoshinori Tani, Yusuke Katayama, Nobuhiro Nishii, Toru Miyoshi, Satoshi Nagase, Kunihisa Kohno, Kengo Fukushima Kusano, Tohru Ohe, Junko Kurokawa, Tetsushi Furukawa, Hiroshi Ito.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is estimated that approximately half of the deaths in patients with HF are sudden and that the most likely causes of sudden death are lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). However, the precise mechanism of ventricular tachyarrhythmias remains unknown. The KCNH2 channel conducting the delayed rectifier K(+) current (I(Kr)) is recognized as the most susceptible channel in acquired long QT syndrome. Recent findings have revealed that not only suppression but also enhancement of I(Kr) increase vulnerability to major arrhythmic events, as seen in short QT syndrome. Therefore, we investigated the existence of a circulating KCNH2 current-modifying factor in patients with HF. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPALEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21625547 PMCID: PMC3098251 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019897
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Clinical characteristics of the study population.
| Case No. | Age/Sex | Diagnosis | NYHA | LVEF (%) | Arrhythmia | QTc (sec1/2) |
| 1 | 73/F | myocarditis | II | 50 | sustained VT | 0.46 |
| 2 | 45/M | DCM | II | 11 | NSVT | 0.47 |
| 3 | 55/F | dilated-HCM | IV | 25 | NSVT | 0.47 |
| 4 | 37/F | DCM | III | 19 | sustained VT | 0.48 |
| 5 | 61/F | DCM | II | 37 | NSVT | 0.43 |
| 6 | 52/M | myocarditis | II | 42 | VF | 0.45 |
| 7 | 48/M | Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy | II | 24 | NSVT | 0.48 |
| 8 | 64/F | Apical ballooning syndrome | II | 47 | none | 0.43 |
| 9 | 61/F | myocarditis | II | 42 | none | 0.48 |
| 10 | 45/M | DCM | II | 50 | none | 0.39 |
| 11 | 55/M | DCM | III | 40 | sustained VT | 0.51 |
| 12 | 37/M | DCM | II | 40 | none | 0.47 |
| 13 | 55/M | DCM | II | 38 | none | 0.47 |
| 14 | 42/M | DCM | II | 20 | none | 0.46 |
NYHA: New York Heart Association Functional Classification, LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction, DCM: idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, HCM: hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, VT: ventricular tachycardia, NSVT: non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, VF: ventricular fibrillation, QTc: corrected QT interval
Patient's medication.
| Case No. | Medications | ||||||
| Antiarrhythmics | Beta- blockers | Diuretics | ACEI/ARB | Anticoagulant/ Antiplatelet | Cardiotonic | others | |
| 1 | amiodarone | carvedilol | torasemide | candesartan | none | none | none |
| 2 | none | carvedilol | furosemidespironolactone | valsartan | none | pimobendan | nateglinide, acarbose |
| 3 | none | carvedilol | furosemidespironolactone | imidapril | none | dopaminedobutaminemilrinone | lansoprazole |
| 4 | amiodarone | carvedilol | torasemide | losartan | warfarin | dopaminedobutamine | none |
| 5 | none | carvedilol | furosemide | candesartan | warfarin | none | alfacalcidol |
| 6 | sotalol | carvedilol | none | candesartan | warfarin | none | potassium chloride, famotidine |
| 7 | none | carvedilol | furosemidespironolactone | valsartan | warfarin | metildigoxin | lansoprazole |
| 8 | none | none | none | losartan | aspirin | none | nifedipine, famotidine, atorvastatin, icosapentate |
| 9 | none | carvedilol | furosemidespironolactone | losartan | warfarin | none | rabeprazole, ferrous citrate |
| 10 | none | none | none | none | none | none | none |
| 11 | none | carvedilol | torasemidetrichlormethiazide | candesartan | warfarin | metildigoxin | pravastatin |
| 12 | none | carvedilol | none | candesartan | none | none | amlodipine |
| 13 | none | carvedilol | furosemidespironolactone | candesartan | warfarinaspirin | none | none |
| 14 | none | carvedilol | furosemide | telmisartan | warfarin | none | amlodipine |
ACEI/ARB: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers.
Figure 1Effect of serum obtained from HF patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia on KCNH2 currents in HEK 293 cells.
A. Representative traces from a single cell cultured in a medium supplemented with 2% serum of a control subject (left) and medium supplemented with 2% serum of a patient with sustained VT (Case No. 1) (right). B. Current-voltage relationships of KCNH2 tail currents. Mean values of peak KCNH2 tail current densities were calculated by averaging the tail amplitude of each subject obtained from cells (n = 8 to 11 cells) exposed to respective sera. Open circles show the results for controls (n = 6), open squares show the results for HF patients without VT and VF (VT/VF (−), n = 6) and closed squares show the results for HF patients with VT/VF (VT/VF (+), n = 8). *P<0.05: VT/VF (+) vs. control and VT/VF (−). C. Maximum values of peak tail current in the groups. *P<0.05: VT/VF (+) vs. control and VT/VF (−). NS indicates not significant.
Changes in voltage dependence of the KCNH2 activation.
| Controls | VT/VF(−) | VT/VF(+) |
| |
| V1/2 (mV) | 5.6±4.8 | 3.7±3.5 | 4.3±2.5 | NS |
| Slope factor ( | 8.2±0.8 | 8.2±0.9 | 8.6±1.0 | NS |
VT/VF (−): HF patients without VT and VF, VT/VF (+): HF patients with VT and VF NS indicates not significant.
Figure 2Relationship between peak tail amplitude and ejection fraction in the overall HF patients.