Many eukaryotic developmental and cell fate decisions that are effected post-transcriptionally involve RNA binding proteins as regulators of translation of key mRNAs. In malaria parasites (Plasmodium spp.), the development of round, non-motile and replicating exo-erythrocytic liver stage forms from slender, motile and cell-cycle arrested sporozoites is believed to depend on environmental changes experienced during the transmission of the parasite from the mosquito vector to the vertebrate host. Here we identify a Plasmodium member of the RNA binding protein family PUF as a key regulator of this transformation. In the absence of Pumilio-2 (Puf2) sporozoites initiate EEF development inside mosquito salivary glands independently of the normal transmission-associated environmental cues. Puf2- sporozoites exhibit genome-wide transcriptional changes that result in loss of gliding motility, cell traversal ability and reduction in infectivity, and, moreover, trigger metamorphosis typical of early Plasmodium intra-hepatic development. These data demonstrate that Puf2 is a key player in regulating sporozoite developmental control, and imply that transformation of salivary gland-resident sporozoites into liver stage-like parasites is regulated by a post-transcriptional mechanism.
Many eukaryotic developmental and cell fate decisions that are effected post-transcriptionally involve RNA binding proteins as regulators of translation of key mRNAs. In malaria parasites (Plasmodium spp.), the development of round, non-motile and replicating exo-erythrocytic liver stage forms from slender, motile and cell-cycle arrested sporozoites is believed to depend on environmental changes experienced during the transmission of the parasite from the mosquito vector to the vertebrate host. Here we identify a Plasmodium member of the RNA binding protein family PUF as a key regulator of this transformation. In the absence of Pumilio-2 (Puf2) sporozoites initiate EEF development inside mosquito salivary glands independently of the normal transmission-associated environmental cues. Puf2- sporozoites exhibit genome-wide transcriptional changes that result in loss of gliding motility, cell traversal ability and reduction in infectivity, and, moreover, trigger metamorphosis typical of early Plasmodium intra-hepatic development. These data demonstrate that Puf2 is a key player in regulating sporozoite developmental control, and imply that transformation of salivary gland-resident sporozoites into liver stage-like parasites is regulated by a post-transcriptional mechanism.
Puf (Pumilio and fem-3 mRNA binding factor) proteins are an evolutionarily highly
conserved family of proteins present from yeast to humans and plants characterized
by a highly conserved C-terminal RNA-binding domain, composed of eight tandem
Pumilio (PUM) repeats. Puf proteins typically decrease expression of targeted mRNAs
by enhancing their decay or repressing their translation [reviewed in 1].
The conserved biochemical features and genetic function of Puf family members have
emerged from studies of model organisms and although Puf proteins have been shown to
play diverse functions, the one frequently shared throughout evolution relates to
the maintenance of stemness [2], [3], [4] and control of differentiation [5], [6], [7].The Plasmodium parasite alternates between mosquito vector and
vertebrate host, with transmission relying on highly specialized parasite stages.
Once inside the new host, developmental progression quickly gives rise to
fundamentally different parasite forms adapted to their new environment [8]. For example,
cell-cycle arrested gametocytes, transmitted from the mammalian host to the
Anopheles vector during a mosquito blood meal, fertilize and
generate the motile ookinete in the mosquito midgut. Similarly, a single slender,
motile and cell-cycle arrested sporozoite, transmitted by a mosquito bite, while
inside a liver cell will develop into a round, non-motile and replicating
exo-erythrocytic form (EEF) and go on to generate thousands of merozoites [9], [10], [11]. Developmental
progression of both gametocytes and sporozoites requires clear environmental cues;
for gametocytes these include xanthurenic acid and a drop in temperature [12], while
sporozoites need a rise in temperature and the presence of bicarbonate [13], [14], [15].The sudden transition between hosts that have very different physiological
environments requires a rapid molecular and cellular re-programming, which may only
be realized by parasites that are in a state of molecular preparedness, while
maintaining a quiescent state until transmission occurs. Indeed, successful
development of the mosquito-infective ookinete relies on the availability of
translationally repressed mRNAs previously transcribed in female gametocytes in the
blood stage, which are only translated following fertilization [16], [17], as well as stored proteins [18]. Although
suggested [19],
[20] it is
unknown whether equivalent post-transcriptional RNA-mediated events facilitate
developmental progression during the parasite's exit from the mosquito and
initiation of EEF development in the mammalian host liver. Still,
Plasmodium sporozoites remain viable and transmission-competent
for weeks in mosquito salivary glands [21].The roles of Puf (Pumilio and fem-3 mRNA binding factor) proteins are diverse yet
intimately involved in the post-transcriptional regulation of developmental and
differentiation factors in organisms as diverse as yeast, Caenorhabdites
elegans, Drosophila and humans [22], [23], [24], [25]. Two such proteins, Puf1
(PFE0935c) and Puf2 (PFD0825c), are known in the humanmalaria parasite P.
falciparum
[26], [27], [28], with orthologs
in all Plasmodium species characterized, including the
rodent-infectious species P. berghei. The
PlasmodiumPuf proteins have the typical highly conserved
organization that includes the eight tandem copies of the PUM RNA binding domain (or
Pumilio homology domain, PHD) at the carboxyterminus of the protein (Fig. S1) and
P. falciparum Puf2 was shown to bind the Nanos Response Element
RNA in vitro
[26]. In P.
falciparum evidence has been reported for a role for Puf2 in gametocyte
development although puf2 is most highly transcribed in sporozoites
[28], [29].Here we provide strong evidence for an RNA-mediated regulatory event in the rodent
malaria parasite P. berghei that relies on the RNA binding protein
Pumilio 2 (PBANKA_071920) to maintain salivary gland sporozoites in a stand-by mode
prior to transmission. The absence of the highly conserved protein Pumilio-2 is
necessary and sufficient to enable the slow and progressive morphological
transformation of P. berghei sporozoites into EEF-like forms while
still inside the lumen of the mosquito salivary gland. This transformation is
characteristic of EEFs both functionally and in respect to their gene expression
repertoire and dissociates the transformation of sporozoites to EEF-like forms from
its requirement for environmental cues.
Similar to P. falciparum, both P. bergheipuf orthologs
(puf1, PBANKA_123350 and puf2,
PBANKA_071920) are not only transcribed in gametocytes but also in salivary
gland sporozoites (SGS) (Fig.
1A, S3C). Antibodies raised against PbPuf2 confirmed the expression of
the protein in SGS and localized the protein to a small number of discrete foci
in the cytoplasm of the cell consistent with the localization of most Puf
proteins (Fig. 1B). To
address the roles of the two encoded proteins during parasite transmission we
generated transgenic P. berghei that lack either
puf1 or puf2, or both genes (Figs.
S2–S4). All 3 gene deletion mutants
(puf1-, puf2-, puf1-/2-)
showed normal growth and multiplication of asexual blood stage parasites and in
contrast to the reports for P. falciparum produced gametocytes
comparable in number to wild type parasites; the transition of gametocytes into
gametes and ookinete formation was also not affected (Table S1).
Furthermore oocyst numbers per midgut and sporozoites reaching the salivary
glands were not significantly altered when compared to wild type parasites
(Fig.
S5).
Figure 1
puf mRNA expression and immunolocalization in
P. berghei RFP+ salivary gland
sporozoites.
A, Relative and stage-specific transcription levels of
puf1 and puf2 in wild type
parasites. puf1 and puf2 steady state
mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-PCR using cDNA from highly purified
gametocytes and day 18 salivary gland (SG) sporozoites. Genomic DNA
amplification is also provided, together with a map showing the
localisation of primers used for amplifying puf1 and
puf2 and the different sizes to be expected in cDNA
and genomic DNA. See also Fig. S3C for Northern analysis of
puf2 throughout parasite life cycle.
B, Sporozoites tagged with red fluorescent protein
(line 733cl1) were stained with anti-Puf2 peptide antibody 904 (top
panel) and 905 (lower panel) revealing distinct cytoplasmic protein
speckles. Scale bars = 10 µm.
puf mRNA expression and immunolocalization in
P. berghei RFP+ salivary gland
sporozoites.
A, Relative and stage-specific transcription levels of
puf1 and puf2 in wild type
parasites. puf1 and puf2 steady state
mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-PCR using cDNA from highly purified
gametocytes and day 18 salivary gland (SG) sporozoites. Genomic DNA
amplification is also provided, together with a map showing the
localisation of primers used for amplifying puf1 and
puf2 and the different sizes to be expected in cDNA
and genomic DNA. See also Fig. S3C for Northern analysis of
puf2 throughout parasite life cycle.
B, Sporozoites tagged with red fluorescent protein
(line 733cl1) were stained with anti-Puf2 peptide antibody 904 (top
panel) and 905 (lower panel) revealing distinct cytoplasmic protein
speckles. Scale bars = 10 µm.Together these data suggested that lack of either Puf1 or Puf2, or both proteins
has no, or at most very minor effects on the majority of the different life
cycle stages of P. berghei, including the number of sporozoites
reaching mosquito salivary glands. However, microscopic examination of salivary
gland 30 days after mosquito infection revealed aberrant morphology of
puf2- parasites (Fig. 2; Videos S1
[wild type], S2 [puf1-], S3
[puf2-]). Sporozoites of both independent
puf2- mutants at day 22 after mosquito infection and later,
began to round up and progressively resembled early hepatic stages (Fig. 2A, B; Fig. S6);
by day 24 after mosquito infection the majority of parasites in mosquito
salivary glands were morphologically similar to early EEF's
(76.49±2.43%) (Fig.
2C) with an average bulging area of 4.72±0.42
µm2 that increased to 6.02±1.14 µm2
on day 30 of infection. The bulging area of older puf2-
parasites is comparable in size to 8–10 hours liver stage EEF's. On
the other hand puf1- and wild type salivary gland sporozoites
(SGS) remained typically slender throughout the entire period (Fig. 2).
puf1-/2- parasites recapitulated the puf2-
single KO phenotype (Fig. S6).
Figure 2
puf2- parasites transform into early liver stage
EEF's in mosquito salivary glands.
A, maximum projection of a z-series scan of infected
mosquito salivary glands on day 30 of mosquito infection.
B, Development of salivary gland-resident parasites from
day 18 to day 30 after mosquito infection; puf2-
undergo exo-erythrocytic liver stage metamorphosis with bulging visible
at day 22 and complete transformation at day 30. C,
Proportion of sporozoites versus EEF-like's of wild type,
puf1- and puf2- parasites in
mosquito SG's during 13 days of salivary gland infection. Scale
bars = 10 µm.
puf2- parasites transform into early liver stage
EEF's in mosquito salivary glands.
A, maximum projection of a z-series scan of infected
mosquito salivary glands on day 30 of mosquito infection.
B, Development of salivary gland-resident parasites from
day 18 to day 30 after mosquito infection; puf2-
undergo exo-erythrocytic liver stage metamorphosis with bulging visible
at day 22 and complete transformation at day 30. C,
Proportion of sporozoites versus EEF-like's of wild type,
puf1- and puf2- parasites in
mosquito SG's during 13 days of salivary gland infection. Scale
bars = 10 µm.
18-day puf2- sporozoites are defective in motility, cell
traversal and infection
At day 18 puf2- sporozoites had reached the mosquito salivary
glands in similar numbers as puf1-, puf1-/2-
and wild type parasites (Fig. S5) and did not present obvious
morphological changes. Although superficially morphologically identical to wild
type sporozoites, 18 day puf2- SGS displayed significantly
reduced gliding motility and cell traversal ability when compared to
puf1- and wild type parasites (Fig. 3A, B; t-test
p<0.05). Consequently, puf2- SGS were less
infective in vitro to Huh7 hepatoma cells (Fig. 3C; t-test p<0.05)
and parasites that had successfully invaded, showed delayed development (Fig. 3D; t-test
p<0.05). When we compared parasite loads in mouse livers
infected 44 hours earlier after intra-venous injection of identical numbers
(n = 10,000) of day 18 puf1-,
puf2- or wild type sporozoites we found a significant
impairment of liver infection by puf2- when either compared to
WT or puf1- parasites (Fig. 3E; t-test p<0.05).
Ten days after i.v. injection of SGS all mice infected with wild type and
puf1- SGS developed blood stage parasitemia, while only
32% of the mice infected with puf2- parasites did (Fig. 3F). During infection by
mosquito bite, blood stage parasites became patent only in mice infected with
wild type and puf1-, but never with puf2-
parasites (Fig. 3G).
Although mice infected with puf1- SGS show a lower parasite
liver load than mice infected with WT SGS (Fig. 3E), no differences were found in blood
stage patency (Fig. 3F and
G). Throughout, the behavior of the puf1-/2- parasite
was similar to the puf2- parasite, which suggests that all
defects are attributable to the lack of Puf2, with no additional effects arising
from the simultaneous deletion of both genes (Table
S2).
Figure 3
Functionality and liver stage infectivity of wild type and mutant
sporozoites.
A, 3×104 sporozoites were allowed to glide
on cover slips pre-coated with anti-circumsporozoite protein (CSP)
antibody for 40 minutes at 37°C. The number of parasites associated
with CSP trails is a measure of gliding motility ability.
B, Dextran tetramethylrhodamine was added to Huh7 cells
before sporozoite addition. Two hours p.i. the number of traversed cells
(Dextran+) was quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
C, Huh7 cells fixed and double-stained with anti-CSP
antibody to distinguish extracellular from intracellular sporozoites
after a 2-hour incubation with 3×104 sporozoites.
D, EEF development 48 h after addition of sporozoites
to Huh7 cells. EEF areas were quantified with Image J of fluorescence
microscopy images. For Figure 3A-D, n = 3. E,
Plasmodium liver load 44 h after intravenous
injection of 1×104 sporozoites; parasite load measured
by qRT-PCR of P. berghei 18S rRNA normalized to
hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. Five C57Bl/6 mice per
group. F, Appearance of blood parasitaemia following
infection of C57Bl/6 with 1×104 intravenously injected
sporozoites (wild type n = 10 mice;
puf1- n = 10;
puf2- n = 25). G,
Appearance of blood parasitaemia after mosquito bite (wild type
n = 4 mice; puf1-
n = 8; puf2-
n = 10). All experiments used sporozoites 18 days
after mosquito infection. T-test * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
All data show mean±SD.
Functionality and liver stage infectivity of wild type and mutant
sporozoites.
A, 3×104 sporozoites were allowed to glide
on cover slips pre-coated with anti-circumsporozoite protein (CSP)
antibody for 40 minutes at 37°C. The number of parasites associated
with CSP trails is a measure of gliding motility ability.
B, Dextran tetramethylrhodamine was added to Huh7 cells
before sporozoite addition. Two hours p.i. the number of traversed cells
(Dextran+) was quantified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting.
C, Huh7 cells fixed and double-stained with anti-CSP
antibody to distinguish extracellular from intracellular sporozoites
after a 2-hour incubation with 3×104 sporozoites.
D, EEF development 48 h after addition of sporozoites
to Huh7 cells. EEF areas were quantified with Image J of fluorescence
microscopy images. For Figure 3A-D, n = 3. E,
Plasmodium liver load 44 h after intravenous
injection of 1×104 sporozoites; parasite load measured
by qRT-PCR of P. berghei 18S rRNA normalized to
hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase. Five C57Bl/6 mice per
group. F, Appearance of blood parasitaemia following
infection of C57Bl/6 with 1×104 intravenously injected
sporozoites (wild type n = 10 mice;
puf1- n = 10;
puf2- n = 25). G,
Appearance of blood parasitaemia after mosquito bite (wild type
n = 4 mice; puf1-
n = 8; puf2-
n = 10). All experiments used sporozoites 18 days
after mosquito infection. T-test * p<0.05; ** p<0.01.
All data show mean±SD.
Transcriptome changes precede visible morphological changes of
puf2- sporozoites
The phenotypic analyses of day 18 puf2- SGS suggested that
premature de-differentiation of sporozoites could already have been initiated
prior to the visible manifestation of the morphological changes evident in older
parasites; we reasoned the absence of Puf2 might affect the steady state
transcriptome; intra-hepatic and axenic differentiation of SGS into EEF's
is correlated with distinct transcriptome adaptations [13], [14], [30]. Therefore we compared in
18-day SGS by RT-PCR (data not shown) and RT-qPCR the expression profiles of
genes known to be transcribed in sporozoites, or in EEF's but not in
sporozoites (e.g. exp-2 - PBANKA_133430 and exp-1
-PBANKA_092670) in comparison to ama-1
(PBANKA_091500). Transcripts of the sporozoite genes gap45
(PBANKA_143760), myo-a (PBANKA_135570), spect2
(PBANKA_100630), celtos (PBANKA_143230) and spect1
(PBANKA_135560) – their protein products are important for gliding
motility and cell traversal [8] – were less abundant in puf2-;
uis-4 (PBANKA_050120) showed no marked difference (Fig. 4A). Conversely, the
liver stage genes exp-1 and exp-2 (a constituent of the PTEX
translocon of exported PEXEL-containing proteins [31]) were clearly more
abundant in the absence of Puf2. uis-1/ik2 (PBANKA_020580), a
kinase reported to regulate translational capacity of salivary gland sporozoites
[32] was
also down-regulated. Together these differences in mRNA indicated that the
changes in morphology of the older puf2- salivary gland
parasite are indeed preceded by changes in steady state mRNA levels in
superficially normal, younger SGS. The down-regulation of
myo-a, gap45, celtos,
spect1 and spect2 could explain why day 18
puf2- sporozoites are deficient in gliding motility as well
as infection (Fig. 3).
Figure 4
Transcriptional changes in puf2-.
A, Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was done on cDNA from wild
type and puf2- salivary gland sporozoites (SGS) at day
18 after mosquito infection. B, Heatmap of expression
changes measured by microarray analysis for >300 genes in wild type
and puf2- at days 18 and 27 after mosquito infection.
Expression values are scaled up to the rows and range from -3 (blue) to
+3 (red). C, Correlation analysis of quantitative
RT-PCR and microarray results.
Transcriptional changes in puf2-.
A, Quantitative RT-PCR analysis was done on cDNA from wild
type and puf2- salivary gland sporozoites (SGS) at day
18 after mosquito infection. B, Heatmap of expression
changes measured by microarray analysis for >300 genes in wild type
and puf2- at days 18 and 27 after mosquito infection.
Expression values are scaled up to the rows and range from -3 (blue) to
+3 (red). C, Correlation analysis of quantitative
RT-PCR and microarray results.
puf2- parasites in salivary glands show progressive
transcriptome changes
The RT-PCR data prompted the analysis of the global transcriptome variations in
puf2- sporozoites. We compared mRNA levels obtained from
both day 18 and day 27 wild type and puf2- parasites by
microarray hybridization using 3 biological replicates from each time-point. In
total, our analyses showed that in the absence of Puf2, 267 genes were
up-regulated (UR) at either days 18 or 27 or both, while 47 were down-regulated
(DR) at least 1.5-fold (F-test, p<0.05; Fig. 4B; Table S3A);
these genes included those that we initially identified in the RT-qPCR survey
(Fig. 4C; Fig.
S7).Our data indicate an overall increase in transcriptional activity in mutant
parasites which is suggested by the larger number of UR versus DR genes (66 vs.
14 at day 18; 271 vs. 47 at day 27, on a pairwise basis,
p<0.05). Still, the DR transcript data set contains genes
that encode components of the inner membrane complex and enzymes of the TCA
cycle (Fig.
S8), as well as genes with a well-documented role in motility and
invasion, reflecting the observed functional deficiencies (see Fig. 3) in the
puf2- parasites. These genes include
celtos, spect1, spect2,
tlp1 (PBANKA_111600), trsp
(PBANKA_020910), siap1 (PBANKA_100620), mtrap
(PBANKA_051280), trep (PBANKA_130650), psop9/gama
(PBANKA_070190), gap45, and p36p (PBANKA_100220; Table S3B);
another 10 conserved, but uncharacterized Plasmodium proteins
that contain a signal peptide, trans-membrane domain(s) or GPI anchor are also
DR, maybe indicating a function during the hepatocyte invasion process.On the other hand, UR genes fit in the categories of DNA metabolic processes,
ribonucleoprotein complex, ribosome/translation and protein folding (Fig. S8).
Of the 7 differentially expressed transcription factors found 6 are UR and
include TFIIH (PBANKA_141340), the RNA polymerase II subunit (PBANKA_020330), 2
putative transcription factors (AP2's, PBANKA_083520 and PBANKA_010950),
and 2 TFIIS Zinc-fingers (PBANKA_030420 and PBANKA_142110; Table S2C);
concomitantly mRNA capping and splicing factors, and genes involved in ribosomal
and transfer RNA processing (n = 16) are almost exclusively
UR (Table
S2D). Throughout, translation factors and ribosomal proteins
(n = 52; Table S3E) are UR in puf2-,
while ik2 (a negative regulator of translation through
phosphorylation of eIF2α) is DR, consistent with the observed increase in
protein translation in IK2 null mutant sporozoites [32]. In parallel, many
chaperones (n = 17; Table S3F) and genes with protein
transport-related functions (n = 29; Table S3G)
are UR; these include for example plasmepsin V (PBANKA_133870)
– the PEXEL-motif cleaving enzyme– and exp2
[31],
[33]. 14
genes linked to the ubiquitin-proteasome system are UR at day 27 in
puf2- parasites (Table S3H) which supports an involvement in
the observed elimination of rhoptries and micronemes during metamorphosis [34].
Additional UR genes in the puf2- mutant include mitochondrial
and fatty acid synthesis genes (Table S3I and J). Finally we observe an
increase in replication factors, rad51 (PBANKA_093950), histone
h2b (PBANKA_094180) and alba-3
(PBANKA_120440; n = 17, Table
S3K).In summary, the microarray analysis emphasizes genes involved in increased
metabolic activity to be UR in EEF-like mutant parasites. The comparison between
wild type SGS from days 18 and 27 post-mosquito infection on the other hand
showed almost no transcriptome alterations. Only 6 and 16 genes, respectively,
were UR or DR out of the total of approximately 5400 P. berghei
genes; none of them however significantly (moderated t-test
p>0.05; Table S3A). This clearly suggests that the
wild type parasites' quiescent yet infective status with respect to
transcription and mRNA abundance is maintained for at least 10 days while
residing in the mosquito salivary gland. A comparison with the sporozoite and
EEF proteomes of the related, rodent malaria species P. yoelii
[35] showed
that 89.7% (96/107) of UR P. berghei mRNAs in
puf2- sporozoites (at day 18 and 27) are indeed detected
only in P. yoelii liver stage parasites but not in SGS,
corroborating the notion that puf2- sporozoites in fact
resemble genuine, early liver stage parasites (Table
S3A).
puf2- parasites in salivary glands exhibit ultrastructural
features of early stage EEFs
Further evidence of the genuine nature of older puf2- parasites
as early liver stage parasites arose from ultrastructural studies. The bulge
formation in the center of parasite is a hallmark of the initial differentiation
process during hepatic development. Importantly, it has been shown to coincide
with a loss of the inner membrane complex (IMC) associated with motility and
rounding-up [34]. When we analyzed wild type and puf2- P.
berghei by EM we found a clear sign of IMC disruption in day 27
puf2- parasites (Fig. 5) but not in day 18
puf2- SGS (Fig. S9). Neither wild type nor
puf1- showed any signs of IMC impairment (Fig. 5). The resulting
protrusions mark the beginning of sporozoite differentiation into liver stage
trophozoites and occur approximately 4 hours after liver cell infection,
following degradation of IMC components [34] such as Alveolin 9
(PBANKA_124060) or MyoA. All these changes in puf2- SGS further
confirm the profound developmental switch in response to the lack of Puf2.
Figure 5
Ultrastructural evidence of puf2- parasites
transforming into early liver stage EEFs in A.
stephensi mosquito salivary glands.
Transmission electron microsocopy of 29-day salivary gland parasites
showing the presence of slender-shaped, wild type and
puf1- sporozoites with outer plasma membrane (PM)
and entirely intact, inner membrane complex (IMC).
puf2- salivary gland parasites developing into
early EEFs show clear IMC disruption in the bulging region (arrows).
Left pictures: longitudinal sections; right picture: transversal
sections. Scale bars = 1 µm.
Ultrastructural evidence of puf2- parasites
transforming into early liver stage EEFs in A.
stephensi mosquito salivary glands.
Transmission electron microsocopy of 29-day salivary gland parasites
showing the presence of slender-shaped, wild type and
puf1- sporozoites with outer plasma membrane (PM)
and entirely intact, inner membrane complex (IMC).
puf2- salivary gland parasites developing into
early EEFs show clear IMC disruption in the bulging region (arrows).
Left pictures: longitudinal sections; right picture: transversal
sections. Scale bars = 1 µm.
Plasmodium sporozoite transformation into EEFs is protein
translation dependent
Overall, our data show that Puf2 is a master regulator of
Plasmodium developmental control during transmission from
the mosquito vector to the mammalian host. The highly conserved nature of the
Pumilio homology domain (PHD) of the Plasmodium proteins [27] (Fig. S1),
its conserved function in many different organisms [5], [22], [36], [37], [38], the capacity of P.
falciparum Puf2 to bind RNA in vitro
[26] and its
localization to few cytoplasmic speckles in P. berghei
sporozoites (Fig. 1B)
strongly suggested that sporozoite latency in Anopheles
salivary glands relies on the control of protein translation through a
post-transcriptional mechanism.The notion that SGS to EEF transformation is dependent on de
novo protein synthesis was supported by the ability of
cycloheximide (a general protein synthesis inhibitor) to significantly reduce
the metamorphosis of wild type SGS into EEF-like parasites (Fig. 6A) in an established in
vitro transformation assay [15]. In this assay, sporozoites
transform into EEF-like parasites within 1–2 h when placed at a
temperature of 37°C (Fig.
6A). Importantly, comparison of transformation of WT and puf-2
sporozoites showed that puf-2 parasites produced almost twice as many early
EEF's compared to WT after 4 h incubation at 37°C in a
cycloheximide-insensitive manner (Fig. 6B). This result implies that, in puf2-
parasites, proteins required for SGS transformation into EEF-like parasites have
already been produced by day 18 of mosquito infection. Indeed, Western blots
performed with 18 day wild type and mutant SGS showed that
transformation-associated changes in protein level had already occurred (Fig. 6C): proteins involved in
sporozoite motility (MyoA) or IMC maintenance (Alveolin 9) are clearly less
abundant in mutant SGS whilst proteins typical of EEF development (Exp1 and
Exp2) are readily detected prior to any morphological changes.
Figure 6
Plasmodium sporozoite transformation into EEF-like
form is protein translation dependent.
A, Wild type 18 day SGS were incubated at 37°C or room
temperature (RT) for 2 h and 4 h and with or without the presence of
cycloheximide (CHD, 100 µg/ml) as indicated. Transformation of WT
SGS into EEF-like in vitro is more pronounced at
37°C for 4 h and relies on protein translation. T-test **
p<0.01. All data show mean±SD. B, WT and
puf2- 18 day SGS were incubated at 37°C for 4 h
with and without the presence of cycloheximide (CHD, 100 µg/ml) as
indicated, showing that transformation of puf2-
sporozoites does not rely on protein translation. C,
Protein expression in puf2- and wild type SGS, 18 days
after infection.
Plasmodium sporozoite transformation into EEF-like
form is protein translation dependent.
A, Wild type 18 day SGS were incubated at 37°C or room
temperature (RT) for 2 h and 4 h and with or without the presence of
cycloheximide (CHD, 100 µg/ml) as indicated. Transformation of WT
SGS into EEF-like in vitro is more pronounced at
37°C for 4 h and relies on protein translation. T-test **
p<0.01. All data show mean±SD. B, WT and
puf2- 18 day SGS were incubated at 37°C for 4 h
with and without the presence of cycloheximide (CHD, 100 µg/ml) as
indicated, showing that transformation of puf2-
sporozoites does not rely on protein translation. C,
Protein expression in puf2- and wild type SGS, 18 days
after infection.Our data clearly show that Plasmodium sporozoite transformation
into EEFs is protein synthesis dependent, and sporozoite quiescence relies on
post-transcriptional control and the RNA binding protein Puf2.
Discussion
Following the mosquito blood meal, sporozoites that manage to invade a host
hepatocyte quickly initiate differentiation into liver stage trophozoites; these
early changes are characterized by a de-differentiation process that involves loss
of the inner membrane complex, protrusions in the region of the parasites nucleus
and loss of internal organelles [34]. A single parasite
ultimately multiplies by a factor of a few 1000-fold within 48 hours in P.
berghei to give rise to first generation merozoites.
Plasmodium development in the liver is accompanied by clear
host cell transcriptional changes and adaptations that reflect the parasite's
needs [39];
these include generation and maintenance of the parasitophorous vacuole, the export
of proteins such as circumsporozoite protein (CS) into the host cytoplasm [40] and possibly
uptake of exogenous lipids [41], replication and differentiation to form merozoites.On the other hand, the transcription of Plasmodium genes essential
for full intra-hepatic development is triggered by a temperature shift and contact
with host cells [13], [14]. Transformation into early EEF's can to some degree
be recapitulated in the absence of host cells; for this, wild type SGS require
merely the presence of serum or bicarbonate and a temperature shift from the
mosquito's body temperature (≈21°C) to the mammalian host's
37°C [13],
[15]. However,
our data clearly show that in the absence of the RNA binding protein Puf2,
initiation of sporozoite to EEF metamorphosis takes place inside mosquito salivary
glands without the need for environmental cues received during transmission from the
mosquito vector to the mammalian host. Although the morphological changes observed
at the light-microscope level could be interpreted as resulting from non-specific
degenerative processes, our data on specific transcriptional changes, changes in
protein synthesis and ultrastructural features indicate that the phenotype of
puf2- SGS is the result of a specific differentiation process
into EEFs. Indeed, the alterations in transcription, protein expression and
ultrastructural features in puf2- sporozoites match those occurring
in early liver stage forms [30], [42] and are not easily
reconciled with random degenerative processes. Importantly, the cellular and
molecular events leading to the metamorphosis of puf2- SGS into
early hepatic stages occur prior to any apparent morphological changes, as shown by
the loss of infectivity of puf2- SGS before any morphological
changes are manifest.In many organisms, Puf proteins inhibit translation of specifically recognized mRNAs
(generally a small number), either by repressing their translation or enhancing
decay [1].
Consistent with this conserved biological function, we show that
Plasmodium Puf2 is localized to few cytoplasmic speckles and
possesses a highly conserved Pumilio homology domain (PHD). Together with our
transcriptional analyses, these data strongly suggest that Puf2 is regulating the
translational efficiency of one or several unknown key factor(s); we hypothesize
that once translationally activated such proteins quickly direct the developmental
progression from SGS to early hepatic stages.Recently, the sporozoite's latency status was reported to rely on mechanisms
akin to mammalian and yeast stress granule formation with a phosphorylation
dependent inhibition of protein translation [32]. Absence of eIF2α
phosphorylation in a mutant lacking expression of the PBIK2 protein–the
pbik2 gene was originally identified as upregulated in
sporozoites 1 or uis1
[43]–was shown to result in an approximately 2-fold increase
in translation as measured by 35S-Met/Cys incorporation in sporozoites at
25°C, and 3-fold at 37°C. However, close observation of
ik2- parasites in Anopheles salivary glands
revealed that only 11.6±8% parasites show signs of transformation by
day 30 of infection, while more than 99% of puf2- parasites
are already fully rounded up by that time (Fig. S10). Thus, despite a significant increase
in protein translation in the absence of PBIK2, pbik2- sporozoites
do not initiate the program of transformation as significantly as
puf2- sporozoites. This difference in phenotype could be
explained by a dominant role of Puf2 in binding to essential mRNAs repressing their
translation into proteins that are needed for the transformation program to occur;
in our proposed model (Fig. 7),
we speculate the absence of Puf2 is consistent with the translation of these
essential transcripts thereby triggering premature metamorphosis. This may alleviate
the translational repression promoted by IK2 [32], perhaps involving protein
phosphatase 2C (PBANKA_091340) [44] which is strongly up-regulated in puf2-
parasites at day 18 of mosquito infection (Table S3L). Although we have very limited data on
proteome changes in the puf2- parasites, our Western analyses
indicate that changes (both up and down) in steady state protein levels do occur. It
remains unclear whether Puf2 independent translation is mediated through eIF2α,
although ik2 is already significantly decreased in
puf2- parasites and protein phosphatase activity might be
increased by day 18 of infection.
Figure 7
Proposed model for Puf2-mediated regulation of
Plasmodium developmental progression during
transmission from the mosquito vector to the mammalian host.
In the mosquito Puf2 controls the translation of key protein(s). In its
absence, this(ese) proteins are translated and sporozoites initiate
transformation into the round EEF, which only occurs in the mammalian host
in wild-type parasites.
Proposed model for Puf2-mediated regulation of
Plasmodium developmental progression during
transmission from the mosquito vector to the mammalian host.
In the mosquito Puf2 controls the translation of key protein(s). In its
absence, this(ese) proteins are translated and sporozoites initiate
transformation into the round EEF, which only occurs in the mammalian host
in wild-type parasites.At present the nature of the mRNAs directly regulated by Puf2 are unknown; an
exploratory MEME analysis of DR transcripts identified at all time points was
inconclusive, most likely due to the fact that both the consensus Pumilio
recognition motif (UGUAAA/UAU) and untranslated regions of P.
berghei mRNAs are extremely AU-rich; out of the 374 transcripts
detected to be significantly de-regulated in the puf2 gene deletion
mutant, 106 have at least 1 NRE (Nanos Response Element) within 400 nucleotides of
the stop codon. Statistically, there is no enrichment for NRE's in up or
down-regulated genes (chi-square, df = 1,
p = 0.2238; Table S3N) with the important caveat that actual
3′ UTRs have rarely been mapped in P. berghei; hence these
bio-informatic results are very speculative and identified NRE's may not exist
in mature mRNAs. Nonetheless, Puf2 clearly maintains SGS on a
“stand-by”, quiescent mode until they have invaded mammalian host
hepatocytes where they expand into first-generation, blood-infectious merozoites.
Thus, Puf2 constitutes a key player in the developmental control during a critical
time-point of the Plasmodium life cycle, the malaria
parasites' transmission from the invertebrate to the vertebrate host.
Altogether, and considering the highly conserved nature of PUFs, this shows that
post-transcriptional events are central to the major developmental switches that are
associated with host transition during the Plasmodium life
cycle.
Materials and Methods
Laboratory animals
This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations of both
the Animal Experiment Committees governed by section 18 of the Experiments on
Animals Act and registered by the Dutch Inspectorate for Health, Protection and
Veterinary Public Health (Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport), and the
Portuguese official Veterinary Directorate, which complies with the Portuguese
Law (Portaria 1005/92). The Dutch and Portuguese Experiments on Animal Act
strictly comply with the European Guideline 86/609/EEC and follow the FELASA
(Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations) guidelines and
recommendations concerning laboratory animal welfare. In The Netherlands, all
animal experiments were approved by the Animal Experiments Committee of the LUMC
(ADEC). In Portugal, all animal experiments were approved by the Portuguese
official veterinary department for welfare licensing and the IMM Animal Ethics
Committee. All experiments were carried out using Swiss-OF1 female mice
(OF1-ico, Construct 242; age 6 weeks old, Charles River Laboratories
International, Inc), C57Bl/6 and BALB/c mice (6–8 weeks of age; Harlan
Laboratories, Inc. or Charles River Laboratories International, Inc). All
efforts were made to ensure minimal suffering to the animals.
Generation of puf1 (gene model PBANKA_123350),
puf2 (gene model PBANKA_071920) and
puf1/puf2 P. berghei gene deletion
mutants
puf1 and puf2 were targeted for disruption by
standard double-crossover homologous recombination with linearized targeting
plasmids. Transfection and drug selection of mutant parasites was performed
using standard technology of genetic modification developed for P.
berghei
[45], [46]. Cloned
parasite lines were obtained by limiting dilution. Plasmid integration into the
genome was verified by Southern analysis of separated chromosomes and diagnostic
PCR; the absence of transcript was confirmed by Northern analysis. For details
of vectors, targeting regions, and primers used see Figs. S2
and S3,
as well as Tables S4-7. Plasmids pL0001 and pL0035 can be obtained
from http://www.mr4.org. Details for all Rodent Malaria genetically
modified P. berghei lines used in this study can be found in
the RMgm database (http://www.pberghei.eu).For puf1 gene deletion, PCR-amplified 5′ and 3′
targeting regions were cloned into plasmid pL0001 yielding pAB60 (containing the
pyrimethamine tgdhfr/ts selection marker), or plasmid pL0035
yielding pL1214 (containing the pyrimethamine/5-fluorocytosine
hdhr/yfcu positive/negative selection marker). Mutant
351cl1 (pAB60; puf1-a; RMgm-513) was generated in the
GFP-reference line cl15cy1 [45], mutant 900m2cl3 (pL1214; puf1-b;
RMgm-514) was generated in the GFP+ reference line 507cl1 (RMgm-7 at
http://www.pberghei.eu).The selection cassette (hdhfr/yfcu) in 900m2cl3
was removed by negative selection [47]; four mice infected with
parent population 900 were treated with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC) at a parasitemia
of 0.1–0.5% with a single, daily 20 mg/ml dose (0.5 ml) for a
period of 4 days. Resistant parasites were collected at days 5–7 and
analyzed by diagnostic Southern analysis to confirm removal of the
drug-selectable marker hdhfr/yfcu by a recombination event
between the two 3′-dhfr-ts sequences (Fig. S2). A
PCR amplified fragment of the 3′-dhfr-ts region was used
for Southern analysis (the primer sequences are provided in Table S5).
Parasites from mouse 2 were cloned by limiting dilution, resulting in mutant
900m2cl3 (puf1-b).For puf2 gene deletion, PCR-amplified 5′ and 3′
targeting regions were cloned into plasmid pL0001 yielding pAB70 (containing the
pyrimethamine tgdhfr/ts selection marker), or plasmid pL0006
yielding pL1317 (containing the pyrimethamine hdhfr selection
marker). Mutant 375cl1 (pAB70; puf2-a; RMgm-515) was generated
in the GFP-reference line cl15cy1 [45], mutant 1267cl2 (pL1317;
puf2-b; RMgm-516) was generated in the GFP+ reference
line 507cl1 (RMgm-7 at http://www.pberghei.eu).The following probes were used for Southern analysis: PCR-amplified fragments for
the hdhfr and tgdhfr-ts genes (for primer
sequences see Table S7) and a puf2 sequence consisting of the 0.4
kb EcoRI/HincII puf2 fragment; in puf2- this
part is deleted.In experiment 1081 we generated a mutant line in which both puf1
and puf2 were deleted. To generate mutant 1081cl1
(puf1-/2-; RMgm-591) the selectable marker cassette
hdhfr-yfcu was first removed from mutant 900
(puf1-b) by negative selection essentially as described
[47]. In
brief, 4 mice infected with mutant 900 were treated with 5-fluorocytosine (5-FC)
starting at a parasitemia of 0.1–0.5% with a daily single dose of
0.5 ml of a solution of 20 mg/ml day for a period of 4 days. Resistant parasites
were collected between days 5–7 after start of the 5-FC treatment and the
genotype analyzed by diagnostic Southern analysis to confirm removal of the
drug-selectable marker hdhfr-yfcu by a recombination event
between the two 3′ pbdhfr/ts sequences (Fig. S2).
Parasites from one of the four mice (mouse 2) that had been treated with 5-FC
were cloned by limiting dilution, resulting in mutant 900m2cl3
(puf1-b). Parasites of line 900m2cl3 were then transfected
with vector pL1317 for disruption of puf2 (Fig. S3).
Selection and cloning of transformed parasites resulted in mutant 1081cl1
(puf1-/2-) in which both pumilio genes are
disrupted.
Gene expression analysis by Northern blot and RT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from blood stage parasites from asynchronous and
synchronized infections [48] and analyzed by Northern hybridization. Northern
blots were hybridised with puf1 and puf2
PCR-amplified fragments (for primer sequences see Tables S5
and S7).
As loading control, blots were hybridized with p28
(PBANKA_051490) or with primer L644R specific for the blood stage, large subunit
ribosomal RNA [49].For RT-PCR, total RNA was isolated from highly purified gametocytes and day 18
and 27 sporozoites and reverse transcribed with hexamers and oligo d(T)
oligonucleotides; primers were 479 and 480 for puf1, and 477
and 478 for puf2, in both cases spanning an intron (Table
S8).
Asexual growth rate, gametocytogenesis and gametogenesis
The in vivo multiplication rate of asexual blood stage parasites
was determined during the cloning procedure and calculated as follows: the
percentage of infected erythrocytes in Swiss OF1 mice injected with a single
parasite is determined at day 8 to 11 by counting Giemsa stained blood films;
the mean asexual multiplication rate per 24 h is then calculated assuming a
total of 1.2×1010 erythrocytes per mouse (2 ml of blood). The
percentage of infected erythrocytes in mice infected with wild type reference
lines of the P. berghei ANKA strain typically ranges between
0.5–2% at day 8 after infection, resulting in a mean multiplication
rate of 10 per 24 h [50], [51].Gametocyte and gamete production were determined following standardized
conditions [48]. Gametocyte production is defined as the Gametocyte
Conversion Rate which is the percentage of ring forms that develop into mature
gametocytes in synchronized infections in mice treated with phenylhydrazine.
Male gamete formation is defined as the percentage of male gametocytes that form
gametes after in vitro induction by exflagellation;
exflagellating male gametocytes are counted in a Bürker cell counter 15 to
20 minutes after induction. Female gamete formation is defined as the percentage
of female gametocytes that emerge from the red blood host cells after in
vitro induction of gametogenesis; free female gametes were counted
in Giemsa stained smears made 20 minutes after induction. The fertility of wild
type and mutant gamete populations was analysed by standard in
vitro fertilisation and ookinete maturation assays [52],
[53] from
highly pure gametocyte populations [54]; the fertilisation rate of
gametes is defined as the percentage of female gametes that develop into mature
ookinetes determined by counting female gametes and mature ookinetes in Giemsa
stained blood smears 16–18 h after in vitro
induction.Humanhepatoma cell line Huh7. Huh7 cells were cultured in RPMI medium
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 1% non-essential
amino acids, 1% penicillin/streptomycin, 1% glutamine and 10 mM
Hepes, pH 7 and maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2. All consumables were
obtained from Gibco/Invitrogen.
Anopheles stephensi mosquito maintenance
A. stephensi were bred at the insectary of the Instituto de
Medicina Molecular (IMM). All life cycle associated experiments (mosquito
infection, in vitro Huh7 infection, in vivo
mouseinfection) presented in this paper were performed with GFP+
puf1- clone 900m2cl3 and puf2- clone
1267cl2 and confirmed with GFP- puf1- 351cl1 and
puf2- 375cl1.
Anopheles stephensi mosquito infection and analysis of
parasite development
1×106 infected red blood cells of P. berghei
wild type (259cl2; RMgm-5; GFP+) [52] and mutant lines,
puf1-and puf2- were intraperitoneally
injected in BALB/C mice . Four to 5 days later, when at least one exflagellation
event was observed per microscope field, mosquitoes were allowed to feed on
anaesthetized mice for 0.5–1 h on two consecutive days. At day 10 post
blood meal, 9 infected midguts were removed and the number of oocysts per midgut
determined by fluorescence microscopy. Parasites per salivary gland (SG) were
quantified in 3 independent transmission experiments in which 9 infected
mosquitoes per experiment, from 19 to 22 days after mosquito infection for each
genotype, were dissected; three groups of 3 SGs for each experiment for each
genotype were smashed and the number of parasites per SG quantified in a
Neubauer chamber.
Quantification and morphological analyses of mutant sporozoites
Three A. stephensi SGs infected with wild type,
puf1- or puf2- parasites were removed on
days 18, 22, 24, 27 and 30 after infection. SGs were smashed to release the
parasites, and the proportion of sporozoites to EEFs-like quantified. On day 30
of mosquito infection, whole infected SGs were mounted in glass bottom culture
dishes (MatTek Corporation); a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope (Zeiss,
Oberkochen, Germany) was used to perform a Z-series scan followed by 3D
reconstructions of the infected SGs using Imaris (Bitplane AG, Switzerland).
In vitro sporozoite hepatocyte infectivity
For all experiments, wild type, puf1- and puf2-
salivary gland sporozoites were collected on day 18 after the mosquito blood
meal.Sporozoite gliding was evaluated with 3×104 sporozoites for 40
minutes in complete RPMI, at 37°C on glass cover slips covered with
anti-circumsporozoite protein (CSP) monoclonal antibody [3D11; 53].
Sporozoites were subsequently fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10
minutes and stained with anti-CSP. The percentage of sporozoites associated with
CSP trails was quantified by fluorescence microscopy.Cell traversal assays were performed with 3×104 sporozoites
added to 7×104 Huh7 cells (seeded on the previous day) in the
presence of 1 mg/ml of cell-impermeable dextran tetramethylrhodamine (10 000
MW), lysine fixable (fluoro-ruby) (Molecular Probes/Invitrogen). After 2 hours,
the percentage of dextran-positive cells was quantified by
fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)[55].In order to quantify cell invasion, 3×104 sporozoites were added
to Huh7 cells. Infection was stopped after 2 h by addition of PFA 4%;
double staining with anti-CSP was performed according to [56] in order to distinguish
extracellular from intracellular sporozoites. Intra-hepatic development was
assessed by fixing infected Huh7 cells at 48 h p.i. with 4% PFA.
Parasites were stained with anti-GFP antibody conjugated with FITC (Molecular
Probes/Invitrogen). Pictures were taken on an Axiovert 200 M fluorescence
microscope and EEF size measured using ImageJ 1.38 h software.
In vivo sporozoite infectivity
Male C57BL/6 mice (6–8 weeks) were intravenously (i.v.) injected with
1×104 18-day SG sporozoites (wild type,
puf1- or puf2-). After 44 hours liver
infection load was quantified by qRT-PCR analysis of P. berghei
18S rRNA normalized against hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase
(HPRT) (for primers see Table S4).To assess mutant parasites capacity to pass through the liver and reach the
blood, 1×104 sporozoites were injected i.v. into C57BL/6
mice.To verify mutant sporozoites infectivity during natural infection, C57BL/6 mice
were exposed to 4 infected mosquitoes for 30 minutes. All mice were bitten by at
least by one infected mosquito. Parasitemia were checked by Giemsa-stained blood
smear daily until 10 days post infection.
Electron microscopy
A. stephensi salivary glands infected with wild type,
puf1- or puf2- parasites were removed and
fixed in 2.5% gluteraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate
(pH = 7.3) for 48 hours at 4°C, followed by 3 10-minute
washes in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate. All tissues were post fixed in 1%
OsO4 in deionized water, washed and counterstained with uranil
acetate for 30 minutes. After washing with de-ionizedwater for 10 minutes,
dehydration with ethanol (70% and 96%, 1 minute each) was
performed followed by 2 10-minute incubations in absolute ethanol and propylene
oxide. Salivary glands were finally infiltrated with 1∶1 propylene oxyde
and EPON resin for 30 minutes followed by overnight infiltration in 100%
EPON's resin. The tissues were embedded in flat molds in 100 EPON for 48
hours at 70°C. Ultra-thin sections of 70 nm were cut with a diamond knife
(Diatome 45°) in a ultra-microtome (Reichert Jung Ultracut-E), collected on
copper grids (mesh 200 hexagonal) and stained with Reynolds lead citrate and
2% uranil acetate (5+5 minutes). The grids were observed on a Jeol
JEM-100cxI transmission electron microscope.
Expression profiling Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCRs and RT-qPCR
Wild type, puf1- and puf2- sporozoites were
extracted at days 18 and 27 post mosquito infection; total RNA was extracted
with TRIzol, and 400 ng total RNA reverse transcribed in the presence of random
hexamers and oligo d(T) oligonucleotides with Superscript II. 25 ng were used in
a PCR using the following cycling parameters: 94°C 3 minutes, 35 cycles of
94°C 10 seconds and 1 minute at 60°C, with a final elongation step of 10
minutes. PCR amplicons were run on 2% agarose gels. Oligonucleotide
primers are shown in Table S3. Negative controls were performed
with RT-negative samples (data not shown). RT-qPCR analyses were performed on
cDNA prepared from day 18 wild type and puf2- salivary gland
sporozoites; oligonucleotide primers are shown in Table S8.
qPCR was done with Power SYBR Green (Applied Biosystems) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Three independent biological replicate cDNA
samples were tested for each parasite. ABI 7500 Fast Sequence Detection System.
Cycling parameters for all genes were: 95°C for 15 minutes, followed by 50
cycles of 95°C|15 seconds, 55°C|15 seconds, 60°C|45 seconds,
followed by melting curve analyses. Relative mRNA abundance for each transcript
was determined by the 2−ΔΔCt method following ABI
User Bulletin 2; expression data was normalised versus ama-1.
Final values were log2 transformed to be comparable to subsequent microarray
data.
Expression profiling by microarray hybridization
The RMSANGER Affymetrix custom tiling array was designed against the 8 x genome
assemblies for P. berghei and P. chabaudi.
Prior to analysis, all 6.3 million probes were remapped using the exonerate
software (http://http://www.ebi.ac.uk/~guy/exonerate) against the
latest P. berghei genome assembly available from the Wellcome
Trust Sanger institute (ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/pathogens/P_berghei/February_2011);
all non-exact matches and redundant probes were discarded. A custom CDF file was
generated using a combination of Perl scripts to analyse gene expression
profiles of all ≈5000 annotated genes. 18 and 27 days sporozoites were
dissected from salivary glands of Anopheles stephensi
mosquitoes infected with wild type (ANKA GFPcon 259cl2) or
puf2- (1267cl2 ). RNA from 3 independent infections each
was extracted with TRIzol according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Double amplified cDNA was synthesized using the Ambion WT Expression kit
starting with ≈400 ng of mRNA and labelled using the Affymetrix Genechip WT
Terminal Labeling and Hybridisation Kit according to the manufacturers'
protocols. 18 hours hybridisations, washing, and staining were done according to
Affymetrix recommendations. Genechip arrays were scanned with an Affymetrix 7G
scanner. Raw scanned images were acquired using Affymetrix software suite GCOS
and raw CEL files transferred to R/Bioconductor for pre-processing. The
3×wild type 18 days pi, 3×wild type 27 days pi,
3×puf2- 18 days pi and 2×puf2-
27 days p.i. hybridised arrays were background subtracted, quantile normalised
and median polished using RMA [57]. An overall F-test was used to select for 374 variant
genes using an adjusted p-value <0.05 (after correction for false discovery
rate using the Bonferroni-Hochberg adjustment). A linear modelling was used to
extract differential expression (DE) for each pair wise comparison using the
Limma package [58]. Gene Ontology enrichment was tested using GOstats
[59],
GO.db (M. Carlson, S. Falcon, H. Pages and N. Li. GO.db: A set of annotation
maps describing the entire Gene Ontology. R package version 2.3.5.) and
GohyperGall function as described in [60] using the GO terms annotated
for P. falciparum orthologs (version 5/31/2010, downloaded from
http://www.geneontology.org/GO.downloads.annotations.shtml). All
microarray gene expression data are presented in Table S3.
Microarray gene expression for selected genes was validated with RT-qPCR (Fig. S7).
Microarray data have been submitted to ArrayExpress under the accession number
E-TABM-1067.
Protein expression profiling by Western Blot
Wild type and puf2- sporozoites were extracted from mosquito
salivary glands at day 18 post infection. An amount of protein corresponding to
300 000 sporozoites was loaded in each well of a 10% polyacrylamide gel
and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane (Protran) by electroblotting. Protein
expression levels were determined by incubating the membranes overnight at
4°C, with the following primary antibodies: anti-Exp1 (kindly provided by
Volker Heussler), 1∶1000; anti-Exp2 (kindly provided by Paul Gilson and
Brendan Crabb) 1∶1000; anti-Myo-A (kindly provided by Julian Rayner),
1∶300 and anti-Alveolin-9, 1∶300 and subsequent incubation with
horseradish-peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody. Immunostained proteins
were visualized with chemiluminescence detection (Thermo Scientific).
Immunofluorescence assay of Puf2
Red fluorescent protein (RFP)+ sporozoites from the wild type reference line
733cl1 (RMgm-86) were dissected at day 23 post infection and washed once in 1X
PBS (9300 rcf, 7 minutes, 4°C). 6500 parasites in 10 µl were allowed
to adhere to polylysine slides, fixed for 15 minutes with 4% PFA, and
washed 3×5 minutes with 1X PBS. After a 10-minutes wash with fresh 0.1 M
Glycine buffer, sporozoites were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X100 for
10 minutes followed by a 3x5 minutes wash with 1X PBS. Slides were blocked 20
minutes at RT in 1% Albumin and incubated O/N with polyclonal rabbit
anti-Puf antiserum (dilution 1∶300) upside down. Sera 904 and 905 were
raised in rabbits immunised against FKDNLYNLKELNSW and ENLDKLKEETYILR at
Eurogentec. Slides were washed 3x 15minutes in 1X PBS and incubated with donkey
anti-rabbit, Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody, 30 minutes, 37°C
(1∶400) again upside down. Slides were washed 3x 15 minutes in PBS 1X, and
then incubated 3 minutes with DAPI, RT. Prior to mounting, slides were washed
for 5 minutes and analysed with a widefield Zeiss Axiovert 200M microscope, with
63x, 1.40 NA objective. To ascertain sera specificity, pre-adsorption
experiments using 5 µg of peptides were used together with labelling using
an unrelated rabbit polyclonal antibody (data not shown). Donkey anti-rabbit was
used without a primary antibody to make sure no cross reaction was to be
observed (data not shown).
Protein inhibitor experiment on salivary gland at 18 days post mosquito
infection
Day 18 salivary gland sporozoites (SGS) were hand dissected from both wild type
and puf2- parasite lines. 96-wells plate were seeded with
20,000 SGS in triplicate for both wild type and puf2- with or
without 100 ug/ml (357.1 µM) of Cycloheximide (Sigma) in RPMI medium
(without FBS supplement) and allowed to develop for 2 and 4 h at room
temperature or 37°C. Three images were taken for each well using a widefield
Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope, with 20x, 1.40 NA objective and parasites
counted using ImageJ software to determine slender versus round.
List of accession numbers
Puf1/UIS9 (PFE0935c, PBANKA_123350), Puf2 (PFD0825c, PBANKA_071920), Exp-2
(PBANKA_133430), Exp-1 (PBANKA_092670), Ama-1 (PBANKA_091500), GAP45
(PBANKA_143760), Myo-A (PBANKA_135570), Spect2 (PBANKA_100630), CelTOS
(PBANKA_143230), Spect1 (PBANKA_135560), UIS4 (PBANKA_050120), UIS1/IK2
(PBANKA_020580), TLP1 (PBANKA_111600), TRSP (PBANKA_020910), SIAP1
(PBANKA_100620), MTRAP (PBANKA_051280), TREP (PBANKA_130650), PSOP9/GAMA
(PBANKA_070190), P36p (PBANKA_100220), TFIIH (PBANKA_141340), RNA polymerase II
subunit (PBANKA_020330), AP2 (PBANKA_083520 and PBANKA_010950), TFIIS
Zinc-fingers (PBANKA_030420 and PBANKA_142110), Plasmepsin V (PBANKA_133870),
RAD51 (PBANKA_093950), Histone H2B (PBANKA_094180) and ALBA3 (PBANKA_120440),
Alveolin 9 (PBANKA_124060), Protein phosphatase 2C, putative
(PBANKA_091340).Sequence alignment and molecular model of Plasmodium berghei
Puf2.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Generation and analysis of mutants lacking puf1.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Generation and analysis of mutants lacking expression of
puf2.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Generation and analysis of mutant 1081cl1 lacking expression of
puf1 and puf2.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Development of mutant parasites in the mosquito.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.puf2- (375 cl1) and puf1-/2- (1081 cl1)
parasites transform into early EEFs in Anopheles stephensi
mosquito salivary glands.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Microarray results for 11 genes initially tested by quantitative RT-PCR (see
Figure 3).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Gene Ontology enrichment analysis clearly separates up-regulated transcripts
from down-regulated ones.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.Ultrastructure of puf2- salivary gland sporozoites on day 18
after A. stephensi mosquito infection.(TIF)Click here for additional data file.30 days -old puf2- (375 cl1) and eik2-
parasites do not transform into early EEFs in A. stephensi
mosquito salivary glands to the same extend.(JPG)Click here for additional data file.Growth characteristics of blood and mosquito stage parasites of wild type,
puf1- and puf2- parasites.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Functionality and liver stage infectivity of puf gene
deletion mutant.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.A-N. List of genes up- or down-regulated by microarray analysis using
RMSANGER Affymetrix custom designed array.(XLS)Click here for additional data file.Details of the two puf1- P. berghei
lines.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Primers used for the generation and analysis of the puf1-
lines.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Details of the two puf2- lines.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Primers used for the generation and analysis of puf2-
lines.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.List of primer sequences used in RT-PCR and qRT-PCR experiments.(DOC)Click here for additional data file.Three-dimensional reconstruction of an A. stephensi salivary
gland infected with wild type sporozoites.(AVI)Click here for additional data file.Three-dimensional reconstruction of an A. stephensi salivary
gland infected with puf1- sporozoites.(AVI)Click here for additional data file.Three-dimensional reconstruction of an A. stephensi salivary
gland infected with puf2- sporozoites.(AVI)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: M M Mota; G Pradel; J P Vanderberg; J C Hafalla; U Frevert; R S Nussenzweig; V Nussenzweig; A Rodríguez Journal: Science Date: 2001-01-05 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Kai Matuschewski; Jessica Ross; Stuart M Brown; Karine Kaiser; Victor Nussenzweig; Stefan H I Kappe Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-08-12 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Blandine Franke-Fayard; Holly Trueman; Jai Ramesar; Jacqui Mendoza; Maarten van der Keur; Reinier van der Linden; Robert E Sinden; Andrew P Waters; Chris J Janse Journal: Mol Biochem Parasitol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Elyse E Muñoz; Kevin J Hart; Michael P Walker; Mark F Kennedy; Mackenzie M Shipley; Scott E Lindner Journal: Mol Microbiol Date: 2017-08-29 Impact factor: 3.501
Authors: Scott E Lindner; Sebastian A Mikolajczak; Ashley M Vaughan; Wonjong Moon; Brad R Joyce; William J Sullivan; Stefan H I Kappe Journal: Cell Microbiol Date: 2013-02-27 Impact factor: 3.715