BACKGROUND: Many pesticides have been shown to act as endocrine disrupters. Although the potencies of currently used pesticides as hormone agonists/antagonists are low compared with those of natural ligands, their ability to act via multiple mechanisms might enhance the biological effect. The organophosphate Chlorpyrifos (CHP) has been shown to be weakly estrogenic and cause adverse neurodevelopmental effects in mammals. However, no information is available on the endocrine effects of CHP in aquatic organisms. In the digestive gland of the bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis, a target tissue of both estrogens and pesticides, the possible effects of CHP on the responses to the natural estrogen 17β-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mussels were exposed to CHP (4.5 mg/l, 72 hrs) and subsequently injected with E(2) (6.75 ng/g dw). Responses were evaluated in CHP, E(2) and CHP/E(2) treatment groups at 24 h p.i. by a biomarker/transcriptomic approach. CHP and E(2) induced additive, synergistic, and antagonistic effects on lysosomal biomarkers (lysosomal membrane stability, lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio, lipofuscin and neutral lipid accumulation). Additive and synergistic effects were also observed on the expression of estrogen-responsive genes (GSTπ, catalase, 5-HTR) evaluated by RT-Q-PCR. The use of a 1.7K cDNA Mytilus microarray showed that CHP, E(2) and CHP/E(2), induced 81, 44, and 65 Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), respectively. 24 genes were exclusively shared between CHP and CHP/E(2), only 2 genes between E(2) and CHP/E(2). Moreover, 36 genes were uniquely modulated by CHP/E(2). Gene ontology annotation was used to elucidate the putative mechanisms involved in the responses elicited by different treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results show complex interactions between CHP and E(2) in the digestive gland, indicating that the combination of certain pesticides and hormones may give rise to unexpected effects at the molecular/cellular level. Overall, these data demonstrate that CHP can interfere with the mussel responses to natural estrogens.
BACKGROUND: Many pesticides have been shown to act as endocrine disrupters. Although the potencies of currently used pesticides as hormone agonists/antagonists are low compared with those of natural ligands, their ability to act via multiple mechanisms might enhance the biological effect. The organophosphate Chlorpyrifos (CHP) has been shown to be weakly estrogenic and cause adverse neurodevelopmental effects in mammals. However, no information is available on the endocrine effects of CHP in aquatic organisms. In the digestive gland of the bivalve Mytilus galloprovincialis, a target tissue of both estrogens and pesticides, the possible effects of CHP on the responses to the natural estrogen 17β-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Mussels were exposed to CHP (4.5 mg/l, 72 hrs) and subsequently injected with E(2) (6.75 ng/g dw). Responses were evaluated in CHP, E(2) and CHP/E(2) treatment groups at 24 h p.i. by a biomarker/transcriptomic approach. CHP and E(2) induced additive, synergistic, and antagonistic effects on lysosomal biomarkers (lysosomal membrane stability, lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio, lipofuscin and neutral lipid accumulation). Additive and synergistic effects were also observed on the expression of estrogen-responsive genes (GSTπ, catalase, 5-HTR) evaluated by RT-Q-PCR. The use of a 1.7K cDNA Mytilus microarray showed that CHP, E(2) and CHP/E(2), induced 81, 44, and 65 Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), respectively. 24 genes were exclusively shared between CHP and CHP/E(2), only 2 genes between E(2) and CHP/E(2). Moreover, 36 genes were uniquely modulated by CHP/E(2). Gene ontology annotation was used to elucidate the putative mechanisms involved in the responses elicited by different treatments. CONCLUSIONS: The results show complex interactions between CHP and E(2) in the digestive gland, indicating that the combination of certain pesticides and hormones may give rise to unexpected effects at the molecular/cellular level. Overall, these data demonstrate that CHP can interfere with the mussel responses to natural estrogens.
Many endocrine-disrupting compounds (EDCs) so far identified are persistent
organochlorine pesticides (e.g., DDT, methoxychlor, dieldrin) [1]. Compared to these, modern
pesticides, such as most organophosphates, do not bioaccumulate and therefore they
might not reach concentrations able to cause endocrine disruption in humans or
wildlife. However, organophosphorous and carbamate pesticides and their residues are
present in the environment, in food items and human tissues and fluids all over the
world [2], [3]; some of these
have been reported to possess endocrine-disrupting properties [2], [4]–[6].The potencies of pesticides as estrogen agonists/antagonists and antiandrogens
in vitro are low compared with those of natural ligands [7]. However,
chemicals with similar estrogenic potencies in vitro sometimes show
very different potencies in vivo
[8]. Their ability
to act via more than one mechanism might enhance the biological effect in the intact
organism, since the final response will likely be determined by the interactions of
all pathways implicated. In this view, the application of ecotoxicogenomics, that is
the study of gene expression in either target or non-target organisms, represents a
powerful tool to understand, and infer, the molecular/cellular mechanisms involved
in responses to environmental toxicant exposure in various species [9], [10].Among the organophosphate insecticides, Chlorpyrifos (CHP) (phosphorothionic acid
O, O-diethyl
O-[3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl] ester) was first introduced
into marketplace in 1965 and used in agriculture worldwide [11]. The primary target organ for
CHP is the nervous system, due to the ability of the chlorpyrifos-oxon metabolite to
inhibit acetylcholinesterase (AChE) activity [11], [12]. However, several studies
identified putative neurodevelopmental mechanisms that are independent of
cholinesterase inhibition [11], [13]–[16]. CHP has been shown to interfere with different
components of cell signalling [17]–[20], and to affect oxidative stress parameters in the
developing brain, leading to shifts in expression and function of antioxidant genes
[21], [22]. Beside brain
defects, genital defects including undescended testes, microphallus, and fused labia
were also reported [4], [5], [23]. In vitro, CHP showed a weak estrogenic
activity in estrogenicity assays, and no significant effects on the response induced
by 17β-estradiol were observed [7]. CHP also showed a weak
increasing effect on the basal ERβ mRNA level in MCF-7 cells [24].CHP is known to pose acute and chronic risks to many non-target wildlife [3], [6], [12], [25]. In
terrestrial snails, long-term exposure to CHP induced lysosomal membrane
destabilisation and increased AMPc (Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate) levels in the
digestive gland [26]. In the zebrafish, CHP did not lead to developmental
alterations but induced the Hsp70 response as well as histopathological damage [27].
Bioconcentration of CHP has been investigated in bivalves [28], [29]. CHP significantly reduced
AChE activity in both freshwater (Amblema plicata) and marine
(Mytilus galloprovincialis) species [30], [31]. In the digestive gland of
M. galloprovincialis, short term exposure (72 h) to low
µM concentrations of CHP affected lysosomal biomarkers and gene expression
[31]. In this
species, the digestive gland, a tissue that plays a key role in metabolism and
nutrient distribution to the gonad during gametogenesis, represents a target for the
action of the natural estrogen 17β-estradiol (E2), as well as for
estrogenic chemicals, both individually [32], [33] and in mixtures [34]. In particular,
administration of estrogens by injection into the circulation significantly affected
lysosomal biomarkers, antioxidant enzyme activities and gene expression, with both
common and distinct effects of individual estrogens and mixtures [32]–[34].In this work the possible effects of pre-exposure to CHP on the responses to
E2 were evaluated in the digestive gland of M.
galloprovincialis. Mussels were exposed to CHP (4.5 mg/l/animal) or
vehicle for 72 hrs, subsequently injected with E2, and samples collected
at 24 hr post-injection. Lysosomal biomarkers were evaluated and expression of
individual genes was determined by RT-Q-PCR. Moreover, molecular responses to CHP-,
E2- and CHP/E2-exposure were investigated by a
transcriptomic approach utilizing a cDNA microarray developed for M.
galloprovincialis (MytArray V 1.1) [31], [35]. The results indicate that in
mussel digestive gland CHP interferes with the responses to the natural estrogen
E2.
Results
Effects of CHP, E2 and CHP/E2 on lysosomal
biomarkers
The effects of different exposure conditions (CHP, E2 and
CHP/E2) on digestive gland lysosomal biomarkers were first
evaluated and the results are reported in Fig. 1. As shown in Fig. 1A, CHP induced a significant decrease
in lysosomal membrane stability-LMS (about −55% with respect to
controls); a smaller effect was observed with E2 (−40%).
Pre-exposure to CHP followed by E2 injection resulted in stronger
lysosomal destabilisation (−71%). Representative images of the
effects of differerent experimental conditions on LMS, evaluated as latency of
the lysosomal N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase activity, are reported in Fig. S1.
The lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio was unaffected by either individual
treatment, whereas a significant increase was observed in CHP/E2
samples (+35% with respect to controls) (Fig. 1B). Similarly, neither CHP or
E2 alone induced accumulation of lipofuscin, whereas a
significant increase was observed in CHP/E2-treated mussels
(+43% with respect to controls) (Fig. 1C). CHP induced a significant increase
in neutral lipid (NL) content (up to +160% with respect to
controls); a smaller effect was observed in response to E2
(+27%). In CHP/E2 treated mussels, the level of NLs was
similar to that recorded in E2-injected mussels (+33%
with respect to controls).
Figure 1
Effect of exposure to CHP, E2, or CHP/E2 on
lysosomal parameters in Mytilus galloprovincialis
digestive gland.
Mussels were exposed for 72 hrs to CHP (4.5 mg/l ASW/animal) or vehicle
(0.02% DMSO) and then injected with E2 (6.75 ng/g dw)
or vehicle (0.05% ethanol) and tissues sampled 24 hrs
post-injection. C = DMSO/EtOH. A) Lysosomal
membrane stability (LMS); B) Lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio; C)
Lysosomal lipofuscin accumulation; D) Lysosomal Neutral Lipid
accumulation. Data, expressed as % values with respect to
controls, representing the mean±SD (n = 10),
were analysed by ANOVA + Tukey's post test. a: all treatments
vs C, P≤0.001; b: E2
vs CHPs, = P≤0.001; c:
CHP/E2
vs E2 and CHP
= P≤0.001. b: CHP/E2
vs C and CHP = P≤0.01; b:
CHP/E2
vs E2 = P≤0.001. c:
CHP/E2
vs C and CHP = P≤0.001; b:
CHP/E2
vs E2 = P≤0.05. d:
CHP vs C, E2 and CHP/E2
= P≤0.001; b: E2 and
CHP/E2 vs C = P≤0.05.
Effect of exposure to CHP, E2, or CHP/E2 on
lysosomal parameters in Mytilus galloprovincialis
digestive gland.
Mussels were exposed for 72 hrs to CHP (4.5 mg/l ASW/animal) or vehicle
(0.02% DMSO) and then injected with E2 (6.75 ng/g dw)
or vehicle (0.05% ethanol) and tissues sampled 24 hrs
post-injection. C = DMSO/EtOH. A) Lysosomal
membrane stability (LMS); B) Lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio; C)
Lysosomal lipofuscin accumulation; D) Lysosomal Neutral Lipid
accumulation. Data, expressed as % values with respect to
controls, representing the mean±SD (n = 10),
were analysed by ANOVA + Tukey's post test. a: all treatments
vs C, P≤0.001; b: E2
vs CHPs, = P≤0.001; c:
CHP/E2
vs E2 and CHP
= P≤0.001. b: CHP/E2
vs C and CHP = P≤0.01; b:
CHP/E2
vs E2 = P≤0.001. c:
CHP/E2
vs C and CHP = P≤0.001; b:
CHP/E2
vs E2 = P≤0.05. d:
CHP vs C, E2 and CHP/E2
= P≤0.001; b: E2 and
CHP/E2 vs C = P≤0.05.Neither vehicle (DMSO or Ethanol, alone or in combination) significantly affected
lysosomal parameters in the digestive gland of mussels with respect to untreated
mussels (not shown).
Effects of CHP, E2 and CHP/E2 on expression of
individual genes by RT-Q-PCR
The expression of genes whose transcription was shown to be modulated by
individual estrogens or mixtures of estrogenic chemicals in
Mytilus tissues [32]–[34], [36] was first evaluated by
RT-Q-PCR through the sybr green I chemistry as previously described [37], and the
results are reported in Fig.
2. These include genes involved in biotransformation and antioxidant
defence (GST-π, catalase) and estrogen and serotonin (5-Hydroxy Tryptamine)
receptors (Mytilus Estrogen Receptor MeER2 and 5-HT receptor),
whose annotated sequences (see Table S1) were not included in the MytArray.
CHP and E2 alone did not significantly affect the expression of
GST-π (Fig. 2A);
however, a large, significant increase in GST-π transcription was observed
in CHP/E2 treated mussels (up to about 4-folds with respect to
controls, P≤0.05). CHP and E2 alone induced a significant increase
in transcription of catalase (Fig.
2B); an additive effect was observed in the CHP/E2 group
(up to a 3-fold increase with respect to controls; P≤0.05). Moreover, both
CHP and E2 alone induced a significant decrease in transcription of
the 5-HTR; such down-regulation was not observed in the CHP/E2 group
(Fig. 2C). On the other
hand, transcription of the MeER2 receptors was similarly down-regulated in all
exposure groups (Fig.
2D).
Figure 2
Effects of CHP, E2, or CHP/E2 on expression of
estrogen-responsive genes in Mytilus evaluated by
RT-Q-PCR.
A) GST-π (GSH transferase) (AF527010) and catalase (AY743716); B)
5-HTR (M. edulis 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor)
(AB526218) and MeER2 (M. edulis Estrogen Receptor 2
isoform) (AB257133). Gene expression was determined by quantitative
RT-PCR as described in methods. The
Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) [61] was used to
calculate group means by means of the delta-delta Ct method adjusted for
PCR efficiency using a 18S ribosomal target as reference gene [60]
and data are reported as relative expression with respect to the control
sample (DMSO/EtOH). Data are the mean±SD obtained from at least 4
independent RNA samples in triplicate.*
= P≤0.05 Mann-Whitney U test.
Effects of CHP, E2, or CHP/E2 on expression of
estrogen-responsive genes in Mytilus evaluated by
RT-Q-PCR.
A) GST-π (GSH transferase) (AF527010) and catalase (AY743716); B)
5-HTR (M. edulis 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor)
(AB526218) and MeER2 (M. edulis Estrogen Receptor 2
isoform) (AB257133). Gene expression was determined by quantitative
RT-PCR as described in methods. The
Relative Expression Software Tool (REST) [61] was used to
calculate group means by means of the delta-delta Ct method adjusted for
PCR efficiency using a 18S ribosomal target as reference gene [60]
and data are reported as relative expression with respect to the control
sample (DMSO/EtOH). Data are the mean±SD obtained from at least 4
independent RNA samples in triplicate.*
= P≤0.05 Mann-Whitney U test.Neither vehicle (DMSO or Ethanol, alone or in combination) did significantly
affect the expression of the genes considered in this study in the digestive
gland of mussels (not shown).
Transcriptomic analysis
To get more clues on the molecular effects of E2 and the possible
interference of pre-exposure with CHP with the responses to the hormone, we
carried out a trascriptomic analysis on digestive gland RNA samples by means of
the MytArray V1.1 1.7 K cDNA chip [31], [35] (Table S1).
Dual color hybridisation microarray analysis unveiled a total of 148
differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in at least one out the three analyzed
conditions (CHP, E2 and CHP/E2) (Fig. 3 and Table S1).
CHP alone elicited the highest molecular responses displaying 81 DEGs of which
73% (n = 59) were up-regulated (Table S1).
In E2-treated mussels, microarray analysis displayed 44 DEGs with 29
up-regulations (66%), while the CHP/E2 group showed 65 DEGs,
mostly up-regulated (53 genes, 81%). About 41% of DEGs
(n = 27) found in the CHP/E2 group overlapped
with those modulated by CHP, whereas only the 8% (5 genes) was shared
with E2. The expression of another set of 36 DEGs was modulated only
in CHP/E2 samples (Fig.
3). A functional genomic analysis based on Gene Ontology term
distribution was carried out to unravel the biological processes and molecular
functions over-represented in each DEG list. To this aim, each set of GO (Gene
Ontology) terms associated with a gene list was filtered against the reference
set of GO terms associated with the whole array-sequence catalog by means of a
hypergeometric statistics (Fisher's exact test, P<0.05). These results
are summarized in Fig. 4 and
Fig. 5 (see also Table S2).
Moreover, to infer virtual biological interactions elicited by the joint action
of the pesticide and E2, we used the same statistical approach to
highlight GO terms that were over-represented in the E2 gene list
with respect to the CHP/E2 group (Table 1).
Figure 3
Venn diagram representation of gene expression patterns.
The diagram clearly depicted that only two of the five overlapping genes
were specifically shared between E2 and CHP/E2:
AJ625117 with no annotation, and AJ516728, a putative dermatopontin.
Data used to generate the Venn-diagram were obtained from microarray
analysis (Table S1).
Figure 4
Functional genomics analysis: multi-level GO pie charts.
The GO terms (biological processes) associated with the mussel sequences
present in the array that resulted enriched by each treatment are
reported (hypergeometric statistics, p<0.05). Due to
the hierarchical structure of the GO tree, only the lowest nodes with at
least four associated sequences were depicted. Additional information is
given in Table S2.
Figure 5
Functional genomics analysis: GO bar chart.
GO terms (biological processes, molecular functions and cellular
components) were obtained from a hypergeometric statistics (P<0.05)
comparing the distribution of GO terms from each gene list with that
obtained from the whole microarray catalogue. Bar length represents the
relative frequency (%) of a GO term in each analyzed condition.
Absolute frequencies of GO terms are also reported. Only GO terms with
at least two associated genes were considered.
Table 1
E2 specific GO terms.
GO Term
Name
p-Value
# in test group
# in reference group
# non annot test
# non annot reference group
GO:0044425
membrane part
0.03
4
0
18
31
GO:0004871
Signal transducer activity
0.03
4
0
18
31
GO:0060089
molecular transducer activity
0.03
4
0
18
31
GO:0004872
receptor activity
0.03
4
0
18
31
GO:0016020
membrane
0.04
5
1
17
30
Hypergeometric statistics was used to compare the GO term
distribution in the E2 gene list vs the
CHP/E2 group to identify processes characteristic of
the hormone. # in test group: number of genes
associated with each respective GO term into the test group
(E2); # in reference group: number of
genes associated to each respective GO terms into the reference
group (CHP/E2); # non annot test: number of
genes not annotated into the test group (E2); non
annot in reference group: number of genes not annotated
into the reference group (CHP/E2).
Venn diagram representation of gene expression patterns.
The diagram clearly depicted that only two of the five overlapping genes
were specifically shared between E2 and CHP/E2:
AJ625117 with no annotation, and AJ516728, a putative dermatopontin.
Data used to generate the Venn-diagram were obtained from microarray
analysis (Table S1).
Functional genomics analysis: multi-level GO pie charts.
The GO terms (biological processes) associated with the mussel sequences
present in the array that resulted enriched by each treatment are
reported (hypergeometric statistics, p<0.05). Due to
the hierarchical structure of the GO tree, only the lowest nodes with at
least four associated sequences were depicted. Additional information is
given in Table S2.
Functional genomics analysis: GO bar chart.
GO terms (biological processes, molecular functions and cellular
components) were obtained from a hypergeometric statistics (P<0.05)
comparing the distribution of GO terms from each gene list with that
obtained from the whole microarray catalogue. Bar length represents the
relative frequency (%) of a GO term in each analyzed condition.
Absolute frequencies of GO terms are also reported. Only GO terms with
at least two associated genes were considered.Hypergeometric statistics was used to compare the GO term
distribution in the E2 gene list vs the
CHP/E2 group to identify processes characteristic of
the hormone. # in test group: number of genes
associated with each respective GO term into the test group
(E2); # in reference group: number of
genes associated to each respective GO terms into the reference
group (CHP/E2); # non annot test: number of
genes not annotated into the test group (E2); non
annot in reference group: number of genes not annotated
into the reference group (CHP/E2).RT-Q-PCR analysis was further carried out to confirm the expression of selected
genes: two homologue GM2-Activator Protein (AP) genes (AJ624495, AJ624405),
hexosaminidase (AJ623463) and actin (AJ625116) (Fig. 6). Vehicles (DMSO or Ethanol, alone or
in combination) did not affect the expression of the genes considered in this
study (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 6, GM2-AP genes showed two opposite expression trends
characterized, in general, by an up-regulation of AJ624495 and down-regulation
of the cognate sequence AJ624405. The expression of the latter gene was
significantly affected by CHP and E2 alone, whereas that of AJ624495
was significantly increased only in response to the hormone. By contrast,
hexosaminidase and actin expression patterns were not significantly affected in
any experimental condition. The pattern of GM2 AJ624495, as well those of
hexosaminidase and actin obtained from RT-Q-PCR fitted with the outcome of
microarray data (Table S1).
Figure 6
RT-Q-PCR analysis.
Actin (AJ625116); GM2-activator protein: GM2-AP (AJ624495), GM2-AP
(AJ624405); hexosaminidase (AJ623463). The actin gene analyzed by
RT-Q-PCR, which showed no expression changes from microarray analysis,
was included in this survey as a confirmation of the normalization
process based on the expression of the 18S rRNA. Log2 group mean
relative expression levels with respect to control (DMSO/ETOH)
±SD (n = 4) are reported; *
= p<0.05 Mann-Whitney U test.
RT-Q-PCR analysis.
Actin (AJ625116); GM2-activator protein: GM2-AP (AJ624495), GM2-AP
(AJ624405); hexosaminidase (AJ623463). The actin gene analyzed by
RT-Q-PCR, which showed no expression changes from microarray analysis,
was included in this survey as a confirmation of the normalization
process based on the expression of the 18S rRNA. Log2 group mean
relative expression levels with respect to control (DMSO/ETOH)
±SD (n = 4) are reported; *
= p<0.05 Mann-Whitney U test.
Discussion
In this work, the hypothesis that in M. galloprovincialis digestive
gland pre-exposure to CHP may interfere with the molecular and cellular responses to
the natural hormone E2 was investigated. To this aim, a combination of
core biomarkers -i.e lysosomal parameters- and gene expression/functional genomic
techniques was utilised. Moreover, the present study represents the first
investigation on the effects of natural estrogens in a molluscan species based on a
transcriptomic approach. Both CHP and E2 individually have been
previously shown to induce dose-dependent effects on different biomarkers and gene
expression in mussel digestive gland [31], [32]. The results here presented
demonstrate that pre-exposure of mussels to sublethal concentrations of CHP affects
the responses to E2.The CHP exposure dose corresponded to the EC50 values previously obtained
in CHP toxicity assessment in the same experimental conditions, utilising LMS data,
showing a clear dose-response trend with exposure [31]. Under these conditions, about
40% inhibition of digestive gland acetylcholinesterase activity, evaluated as
a specific biomarker of exposure to the organophosphate pesticide, was observed
[38].The E2 injection protocol was utilized instead of estrogen addition in
artificial sea water-ASW since this protocol of exposure to E2 in the
physiological nM concentration range allowed the evaluation of the effects of the
hormone on both digestive gland and immune function in M.
galloprovincialis
[32], [33], [39], probably
bypassing the in vivo homeostatic control of E2 levels
by steroid esterification in the tissues [40]. The effects of E2
were apparently mediated by non-genomic mechanisms [39], [41]. In the digestive gland,
responses of lysosomal biomarkers to E2 injection indicated
dose-dependent decrease in LMS and increase in NL accumulation, with no effect on
lipofuscin accumulation [32].
Effects of CHP, E2 and CHP/E2 on lysosomal biomarkers
and individual gene expression
Both CHP and E2 alone induced lysosomal destabilisation and a larger
effect was recorded in CHP/E2-exposed mussels. On the other hand,
although neither treatment significantly affected the lysosome/cytoplasm volume
ratio, or lipofuscin accumulation, in CHP/E2 exposed mussels a
significant increase in both parameters was observed. CHP induced strong NL
accumulation as already reported [31], whereas a smaller effect
was observed with E2
[32]; however,
the effect of CHP was dramatically reduced in E2-injected animals.
These data indicate that the organophosphate pesticide and the natural estrogen
can exert not only additive, but also synergistic and antagonistic effects on
lysosomal biomarkers. Interactive effects of CHP and E2 were also
observed on the expression of individual genes. In mussel digestive gland, CHP
and E2 induced a synergistic effect on the GST-π mRNA levels, the
main GST isoform expressed in mussel tissues [42], whereas an additive effect
was observed on catalase up-regulation. In differentiating PC12 cells, a
well-established neurodevelopmental model, CHP elicited significant
up-regulation of catalase and of various GSTs [22].In mammals, recent studies showed that not only acetylcholine systems but also
developing serotonin (5HT) systems may be sensitive to organophosphates, with
exposure producing long-term changes in 5HT synaptic function and associated
behaviors (see [16] and references quoted therein). Our data indicate
that in mussel digestive gland CHP induced down-regulation of the 5-HT
Receptor-; a similar effect was elicited by E2, as previously
described in the mantle [36], whereas no significant effects were observed in
CHP/E2 treated mussels.In mammalian cells, organophosphorous pesticides also possess the ability to
interfere with the ERα and ERβ mRNA steady state levels [24], according
to the reported weak estrogenic properties of the pesticide [7]. Both CHP
and E2 induced downregulation of the MeER2 gene in mussel digestive
gland; however, no differences were observed in mussel exposed to
CHP/E2 with respect to individual treatments. Although increases
in MeER2 expression were found in Mytilus tissues in response
to E2
[32], [43], decreases
in MeER2 mRNA levels in female digestive glands (this study), as well as in the
gonad of mature females observed in response E2
[43] suggest
that E2-induced receptor downregulation may occur in female tissues
at certain stages of gametogenesis.
Evidence for seasonal dependent effects in the response to
Chlorpyrifos
In marine bivalves, and in particular in Mytilus spp., seasonal
changes have long been described in different parameters, from the molecular to
the organism level, in relation to differences in both abiotic and biotic
factors, such as temperature, food availability and reproductive stage [44]. These in
turn have been shown to affect the responses to contaminant exposure [44], [45]. A clear
temporal pattern in gene expression profiles has been recently described in the
tissues of a natural mussel population of M. galloprovincialis
sampled over an annual cycle, according to physiological changes in metabolic
processes related to the reproductive stage [46]. In the digestive gland of
female mussels largest differences were observed between January and June-July,
but also between March (spawning stage) with respect to October (developing
stage). These data were in line with the key features of the annual reproductive
cycle of Mytilus spp.The effects of CHP exposure on mussel digestive gland have been recently
characterized by a combination of a biomarker/transcriptomic approach, utilising
mussels sampled in March, during the mature stage of the gonad [31]. In the
present work, experiments were carried out in mussels collected in fall
(October), when most female individuals were in the immature-developing stage
(not shown). In general, the results of lysosomal biomarkers displayed similar
outcomes with respect to LMS and NL accumulation in the two experiments; on the
other hand, the lysosome/cytoplasm ratio was affected by CHP exposure in March
[31], but
not in October [this work]. Since pollutant-induced increase in
lysosome activity involves autophagic processes, reduction of the cytoplasm of
the cells and consequent adverse effects at the tissue level [47], these data
indicate the occurrence of a less severe stress syndrome induced by the
pesticide in mussels sampled in fall.This observation is supported by data obtained at the molecular level, where more
marked seasonal differences in the response to CHP were observed. The number of
DEGs found in the present study was twice as high as that previously observed
(81 vs 43), with only 6 genes in common: the two mam domain containing 2
(AJ624363; AJ624502), ferritin (AJ625268); heat shock protein 90 (AJ625974), a
mucin-like protein (AJ624419) and an unknown sequence (AJ625629). Moreover, the
mRNA level of a 3′-Phosphoadenosine-5′-phosphosulfate (PAPS)
synthetase gene (AJ624309), a coenzyme in sulphotransferase reactions in phase
II of xenobiotic biotransformation, sharply increased in response to CHP only in
the digestive gland of animals samples in fall (Table S1).
The CHP-induced up-regulation of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, in
particular those related to chitinase activities, observed in mussels sampled in
March [31],
were no longer observed in mussels sampled in October (this study). Also
relative abundances of mRNA for the two GM2-AP genes, although showing the same
trend in response to CHP, were very different. Overall, these data further
support the hypothesis that seasonal changes in the physiological status can
significantly affect the response of mussel tissues to contaminants, not only at
the biochemical level, but also at the transcriptional level.
Effects of E2 on transcriptomics
Administration of E2 by injection into the mussel vascular system
resulted in the modulation of 44 genes (about 2.5% of sequences present
in the array), 23 of which bore a functional annotation (GO terms) assigned by
the Blast2GO system [48]. Functional genomics indicated that about 50%
of the annotated DEGs found in response to E2 injection are involved
in primary metabolic processes (n = 12), such as lipid
catabolism (Fig. 4, 5). Among these, two sequences
coded for phospholipase A (PLA) (Table S2). E2 also induced an
increase in the mRNA level of calmodulin gene, which might indicate effects on
Ca2+ homeostasis. E2 was previously shown to
induce an intracellular [Ca2+] rise in mussel
hemocytes in vitro
[41], [49].
Moreover, in these cells, activation of Ca2+-dependent
PLA2 was involved in mediating E2-induced lysosomal
membrane destabilization [49]. The results obtained in vivo on
digestive gland lysosomal biomarkers support the hypothesis of a similar
mechanism driven by E2 also in the digestive gland cells, possibly
involving Ca2+ homeostasis and PLA2 in modulation of
gene expression.Another gene involved in lysosomal lipid metabolism, whose expression was
modulated by E2, coded for the ganglioside GM2-Activator Protein
(GM2-AP) (AJ624495). The GM2-activator is a glycoprotein required for the
in vivo degradation of ganglioside GM2 by hexosaminidase A
[50].
Indeed, two highly homologue GM2-AP genes are represented in the Myt-array V1.1
and therefore the correct expression pattern was investigated by Taqman
multiplexed RT-Q-PCR (Fig.
2). This analysis not only confirmed the over-expression of the AJ624495
GM2-AP sequence in E2-treated samples, but also showed a large
decrease in the cognate mRNA level (AJ624405) (Fig. 6). The discrepancy between microarray
and RT-Q-PCR data was probably due to the high sequence homology of GM2-AP genes
which could not be discriminated merely by the use of a hybridization based
assay. Previous studies carried out by our research group indicated that such
peculiar expression trend in GM2-AP sequences was found in response to various
toxic chemicals and that it might be related to a lysosomal lipidosis syndrome
[31].
However, further investigation is required to elucidate the role of such genes
in lysosomal lipid homeostasis of mussel digestive gland.In E2-treated samples transcriptomics and further GO terms analysis
based on functional genomics also underlined the occurrence of virtual
biological processes and molecular functions typical of a hormone-induced
response. Indeed, specific GO terms such as “hormone response”,
“receptor activity”, “vasculogenesis” and “heart
development” were over-represented in the E2 DEG list (Fig. 5). Linked to the GO term
“hormone response” are the mucin-like genes (AJ624419; AJ516390),
that were over-expressed in response to E2, and the proto-oncogene
myc, that was instead down-regulated (Table S1). Mucin genes are known to be
up-regulated by estradiol and the secretion of such proteins is known to
increase in a variety of normal and tumormammalian cells [51], [52]. Other genes
associated with the GO terms vasculogenesis and heart development might be
implicated in some developmental processes of smooth muscle cells. Among genes
bearing those features, we found two mam-domain containing-2 proteins (AJ624363;
AJ624502) that are involved in angiogenesis [53], and an integrin beta-1
gene (fibronectin receptor beta, AJ626301) putatively implicated in myogenesis
[54].
E2 injection in mussels also elicited the over-expression of
several other muscle proteins such as tropomyosin (AJ625392), paramyosin
(AJ624823) and catchin (AJ625393), a variant of myosin (Table
S1).
Chlorpyrifos pre-exposure abolished the E2 specific molecular
fingerprint
Our data show that mussel pre-exposure to sublethal concentrations of CHP
affected the transcriptomic fingerprint obtained in response to E2
alone. This was clearly depicted by the fact that only two genes, dermatopontin
(AJ516728) and an unknown sequence (AJ625117), were specifically in common
(3.1%) between the E2 and CHP/E2 DEG lists (Fig. 3). Conversely, much more
similarity was found between CHP and CHP/E2 treatments, as these two
conditions displayed 24 (37%) identical DEGs (Fig. 3; Table S1).
Furthermore, functional genomic analysis showed that a relevant part of this
common set of sequences were found associated with the same over-represented GO
terms. These findings indicate that CHP pre-exposure could virtually influence
functional responses to E2 abolishing the estradiol-like molecular
responses (Fig 4, 5; Table S2).
It is worth noting that most sequences obtained for the CHP/E2 group
by means of microarray analysis represented unique genes (Fig. 3; Table S1),
that might give rise to unique molecular functions and/or virtual biological
processes (Fig. 5). These
data support the hypothesis that contaminants like pesticides can show novel,
unpredictable modes of action when interfering with natural/endogenous compounds
such as hormones. The results obtained on the expression of individual gene
sequences by RT-Q-PCR also displayed this trend (Fig. 2). These effects were also reflected at
the cellular/tissue level, as indicated by biomarker data showing interactive
outcomes at lysosomal level.
Conclusions
The results presented in this work indicate that CHP exposure affects the
responses of mussel digestive gland to the natural estrogen E2. In
mussel cells, E2 has been shown to activate both
Ca2+- and kinase mediated transduction pathways [38], [40]. In
particular, E2 activates PKC (protein kinase C) and MAPK (Mitogen
activated protein kinase) signaling, leading to increased phosphorylation of
different transcription factors, including STAT members (Signal Transducers and
Activators of Transcription) and CREB (Cyclic AMP Responsive Element Binding
Protein) [39],
[41]. In
the digestive gland, both genomic and non-genomic modes of action involving
ER-like receptors, as well as receptor-independent mechanisms, may participate
in mediating the effects of E2. In this tissue, E2 was
shown to modulate the lysosomal function as well as lipid and carbohydrate
metabolism [33]; the results of microarray data confirm that
E2 can affect the expression of genes related to the lysosomal
function and lipid metabolism, supporting the hypothesis that estrogens may also
play an indirect role in gametogenesis, by affecting nutrient metabolism and
accumulation. As to the possible mechanisms by which CHP could interfere with
estrogen action, non anti-cholinesterase mechanisms of CHP toxicity involved
altered PKC, MAPK and Ca2+-AMPc signaling [19], [20], [55], [56]. Overall, our results
support the effectiveness of a biomarkers/genomics approach to assess the
effects of 17β-estradiol in the digestive gland of the marine mussel
M. galloprovincialis, and demonstrate that sublethal
amounts of an organophosphate pesticide, such as CHP, are able to interfere with
the responses to natural estrogens. In this light, our data also indicate that
CHP can act as an endocrine disrupter in the digestive gland of mussels.
Materials and Methods
Animals and treatments
Mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis Lam.) (5–6 cm length)
were obtained from a mussel farm in Cesenatico (RN, Italy) in October 2006, and
transferred to aquaria with recirculating aerated seawater collected offshore,
at a density of 1 animal/L. After an acclimation of 6 days at 16°C, groups
of mussels were kept in static tanks (1 animal/L seawater) and exposed to
different experimental conditions. Groups of mussels (4 of 15 animals each) were
exposed for 72 h to CHP (4,5 mg/l ASW) from a stock solution in DMSO. The same
number of control animals were added with the same amount of vehicle (final DMSO
concentration 0.02%). CHP was administered every day, together with a
commercial algal preparation (Liquifry, Interpret Ltd., Dorking, Surrey, UK) and
seawater renewed every two days. After exposure, half of control and CHP-exposed
mussels were injected into the posterior adductor muscle with 50 µl of an
E2 solution (0.5 µM) (from a 10 mM stock solution in
ethanol diluted in ASW), using a sterile 0.1 ml syringe as previously described
[32],
[39],
[41]. The
remaining mussels were injected with 50 µl of a solution of ASW containing
an equal amount of ethanol (0.05%). After injection, mussels were kept in
separate tanks in clean ASW and tissues sampled after 24 h.The CHP concentration used corresponded to the EC50 calculated from
data on digestive gland LMS, previously utilized as the guide biomarker in CHP
toxicity assessment [31]. The nominal E2 concentration (6,75 ng/g
dw, 25 pmoles/ml hemolymph) was chosen on the basis of previous data on the
effects of E2 exposure on mussels in similar experimental conditions
[32],
[39],
[41], on
the circulating levels of free E2 in the hemolymph (about 3
pmoles/ml), and taking into account an average dry weight of whole animal soft
tissues of about 1 g.In all experiments female individuals -screened by microscopic inspection of
Toluidine blue stained cross sections (2 µm) of resin embedded mantle
biopsies- were used for subsequent analyses. Most individuals (about 87%)
were in the I-II stage, indicating immature-developing gonad, with small
percentages in the III or IV stage (ripe, spawning). After treatments, digestive
glands were rapidly removed, frozen in liquid N2 and stored at
−80°C. For transcriptomics, tissues were kept at −20°C in a
RNA preserving solution (RNA Later, Sigma-Aldrich); for histochemistry, tissues
were mounted on aluminum chucks and frozen in super-cooled n-hexane and stored
at −80°C.
Lysosomal biomarkers
Lysosomal membrane stability-LMS, lysosomal neutral lipid (NL) and lipofuscin
(LF) content, and lysosomal/cytoplasm volume ratio, were evaluated in duplicate
cryostat sections of 5 digestive glands according to [57]. Sections (10 µm) were
cut with a Leica cryostat, flash-dried by transferring them to room temperature,
and then stained for N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase activity
[58]. LMS
was evaluated by assessment of latency of lysosomal
N-acetyl-β-hexosaminidase (min). Representative images of lysosomal staining
in different experimental conditions are reported in Fig. S1.
Lysosomal staining intensity was obtained by means of an inverted Axiovert
microscope (Zeiss) at 400×magnification, connected to a digital camera
(Axiocam, Zeiss). Digital image analysis was carried out using the Scion Image
software package (Scion Corp. Inc.) from 8-bit gray scale images. Data were
expressed as percent LMS values with respect to controls.Neutral lipid content was evaluated in cryostat sections of digestive glands
fixed in calcium-formaldehyde (2% Ca-acetate (w/v), 10%
formaldehyde (v/v)) for 15 min at 4°C, followed by a rinsing step with
de-ionised water, and incubation with 60% triethylphosphate (TEP) for 3
min. The sections were then stained with Oil Red-O (1% in 60% TEP)
for 30 s, rinsed with de-ionised water, and mounted in 20% (v/v)
glycerol. Lipofuscin content was determined using the Schmorl reaction on
cryostat sections fixed in calcium-formaldehyde and rinsed with de-ionised
water, as described for the neutral lipid assay, followed by a 5 min incubation
step with 1% Fe2Cl3, 1% potassium
ferrocyanide in a 3∶1 ratio [57]. The sections were rinsed
with 1% acetic acid and mounted in 20% (v/v) glycerol. Neutral
lipid and lipofuscin content were quantified by digital image analysis of
stained sections, as described for the LMS assay.Lysosome/cytoplasm volume ratio was determined on the same sections used for LMS
determination by evaluating the cytoplasmic and lysosomal areas [58], [59].
Quantitative RT-PCR analysis
>Total RNA was extracted from pools of 6 digestive gland pieces using the
TRI-Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). RNA was further purified by precipitation in the
presence of 1.5 M LiCl. The quality of each RNA preparation was verified both by
UV spectroscopy and TBEagarose gel electrophoresis, in the presence of
formamide as previously described [60]. Expression levels of
GSTπ [GeneBank: AF527010], Catalase [GeneBank:
AY743716], serotonin (5-HT) receptor [GeneBank: AB526218] and
Mytilus estrogen receptor 2 (MeER2)
[GeneBank:AB257133] were evaluated as previously described [36].
Aliquots of 1 µg RNA were reverse-transcribed into cDNA using 200 units
RevertAid H Minus M-MuLV Reverse Transcriptase (Fermentas Italy, M-Medical,
Milan), in presence of 200 ng of Random Examers (Fermentas), 1 mM dNTPs
(Fermentas) at 42°C for 60 min in a reaction volume of 20 µl. The cDNA
was used to amplify the genes of interest using a Chromo 4™ System
real-time PCR apparatus (Biorad Italy, Segrate, Milan). Proper aliquots of the
RT mixture were diluted to a final volume of 20 µl in presence of iTaq
SYBR Green Supermix with Rox (Biorad) and 0.25 µM of each specific primer
pairs (TibMolBiol, Genoa, Italy). The primer pairs used and their accession
numbers are shown in Table S1. Thermal protocol consisted of 3 min
initial denaturation at 95°C followed by 40 cycles: 15 s at 95°C, 30 s
at 55°C (30 s at 54°C for MeER2; 30 s at 60°C for 5-HT Receptor), 20
s at 72°C. A melting curve of PCR products (55–94°C) was also
performed to ensure the presence of artifacts. Expression level of 18S did not
change in samples obtained from different experimental conditions (data not
shown). Therefore, expression of the genes of interest was normalized using the
expression levels of 18S as a reference [37]. Relative expression of
target genes in comparison with that of the 18S mRNA reference gene was
conducted following the comparative Ct threshold method [61] using the Biorad software
tool Genex-Gene Expression MacroTM [62]. The normalized
expression was then expressed as relative quantity of mRNA (relative expression)
with respect to the control sample. Data are the mean ±SD of at least 4
samples measured in triplicate.For validation of microarray data, Multiplex TaqMan gene expression assay was
used to assess the expression of actin [GeneBank:L33452],
GM2-activator [GeneBank:AJ624495, GeneBank:AJ624405] and
hexosaminidase [GeneBank:AJ623463] genes as described in [31].
Microarray hybridization analysis
Competitive, dual color microarray hybridization analyses were performed on the
same RNA samples used for RT-Q-PCR analysis following a common reference design
in which each experimental condition was hybridized against the same reference
condition, i.e. digestive gland tissue from vehicle treated animals. Four
different biological replicates were used to analyze each condition. One
replicate per array was used. Microarray analysis was performed using the
MytArray platform [35] (V1.1) essentially as described in [60].
Pre-processing and differentially expressed genes were obtained by means of the
R based package LIMMA [60], [63] through the implementation of empirical Bayes
statistics. B>0, where B-statistics represents the log-odds that that gene is
differentially expressed.
Functional genomic analysis
Functional characterization of mussel genes present in the array was based on
Gene Ontology annotation and it was carried out by means of the universal
platform Blast2GO (B2GO) [48], using default parameters. GO term enrichment
analysis was carried out through the implementation of a hypergeometric
statistics (p<0.05).MIAME compliant microarray data (including a detailed description of each
hybridization experiment) were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO)
database, with the superSeries unique identifier GSE26222.Microarray gene expression profiles. For each experimental
condition (CHP, E2, CHP/E2) the embl gene ID (Gene)
and the putative description assigned by means of the bioinformatic platform
Blast2GO [48] are reported; M = log2
gene relative expression level; B = empirical Bayes
log odd; Adj P = adjusted p value according to 64. A
gene was considered differentially expressed when a B>0 value was
obtained according to the empyrical Bayes B-statistics 65. B values lower
that 0 are shown in red.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Supplementary information to
. Gene
ID, gene description, expression trend of sequences reported in Fig. 4 are reported.(PDF)Click here for additional data file.Determination of Lysosomal membrane stability (LMS) by assessment of
latent lysosomal N-acetyl-508β-hexosaminidase activity in cryostat
sections of frozen mussel digestive gland as described in
[
. Sections were
pre-treated at pH 4.5 and 37°C for 3–40 minutes (3, 5, 10, 15, 20,
30, 40 minutes, respectively). Representative images of
A = Control DMSO/EtOH; B = CHP;
C = E2; D = CHP/E2, where
maximal lysosomal staining intensity represents the labilization period.
(Scale Bar = 10 µm).(TIF)Click here for additional data file.
Authors: Helle Raun Andersen; Anne Marie Vinggaard; Thomas Hoj Rasmussen; Irene Marianne Gjermandsen; Eva Cecilie Bonefeld-Jørgensen Journal: Toxicol Appl Pharmacol Date: 2002-02-15 Impact factor: 4.219
Authors: Victoria Suárez-Ulloa; Juan Fernández-Tajes; Chiara Manfrin; Marco Gerdol; Paola Venier; José M Eirín-López Journal: Mar Drugs Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 5.118