| Literature DB >> 21573210 |
Mohamed Banni1, Alessandro Negri, Flavio Mignone, Hamadi Boussetta, Aldo Viarengo, Francesco Dondero.
Abstract
Seasonal environmental changes may affect the physiology of Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lam.), an intertidal filter-feeder bivalve occurring commonly in Mediterranean and Atlantic coastal areas. We investigated seasonal variations in relative transcript abundance of the digestive gland and the mantle (gonads) of males and females. To identify gene expression trends - in terms of relative mRNA abundance- we used a medium-density cDNA microarray (1.7 K probes) in dual-color competitive hybridization analyses. Hierarchical clustering of digestive gland microarray data showed two main branches, distinguishing profiles associated with the "hot" months (May-August) from the other months. Genes involved in chitin metabolism, associated with mussel nutrition and digestion showed higher mRNA levels during summer. Moreover, we found different gene transcriptomic patterns in the digestive glands of males when compared to females, during the four stages of mussel gonadal development. Microarray data from gonadal transcripts also displayed clear patterns during the different developmental phases respect to the resting period (stage I) with peak relative mRNA abundance at the ripe phase (stage III) for both sexes. These data showed a clear temporal pattern in transcriptomic profiles of mussels sampled over an annual cycle. Physiological response to thermal variation, food availability, and reproductive status across months may contribute to variation in relative mRNA abundance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21573210 PMCID: PMC3088662 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0018904
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Temporal changes of mean water temperature (A), salinity (B) and gonad development (C) across an annual cycle in mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis (Lam.) from Bizerta lagoon (Tunisia).
Note that sampling periods were as follows: March-December 2007; January–April 2008.
Figure 2Mytilus galloprovincialis gene expression profiles of digestive gland tissue across the annual cycle.
The heat map (A) (Pearson correlation, complete linkage algorithm) and the expression view plot (B) report the log2 relative expression level with respect to the selected reference condition (January). 295 differentially expressed genes were generated in at least one condition. Microarray data were analyzed using the Linear Mode for Microarray Analysis (LIMMA) software as described in [50]. B statistics with adjusted p value <0.05 and B>0 were used as threshold for rejection of the null hypothesis (no variation). Supporting information to Figure 2 is present on Dataset S1.
Figure 3Decomposition of gene expression profile.
The k-means algorithm was used for the computation of different gene expression trends in the set of 295 unique genes whose expression was modulated in female digestive gland across the annual cycle (Fig 2 and Dataset S1). K-means is an iterative procedure aimed to reduce the variance to a minimum within each cluster [55], [56]. A tendency curve (centroid) is also depicted (pink solid line). In further analysis, genes included in clusters 1 and 4 were considered together as the two groups differed only for the intensity of relative mRNA abundance. Supporting information to Figure 3 is present on Dataset S2.
GO term over-representation analysis of k-means clustered genes.
| Cluster | Level | GO Term | N | Gene ID |
|
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 9 | AJ625361, AJ623376, AJ626213, AJ625569, AJ625778, AJ624637, AJ624093, AJ625051, AJ625276 |
| 3 | multicellular organismal development | 2 | AJ626213, AJ623925 | |
| 3 | catabolic process | 7 | AJ625525, AJ623376, AJ625569, AJ625778, AJ624637, AJ624093, AJ625051 | |
|
| 2 | Cellular componenet organization | 8 | AJ624894, AJ623937, AJ516886, AJ516796, AJ625032, AJ625091, AJ625595, AJ626097 |
| 4 | nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolic process | 4 | AJ624894, AJ516428, AJ623499, AJ624625 | |
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 3 | AJ516428, AJ516541, AJ625979 | |
| 6 | protein modification process | 2 | AJ516541, AJ625979 | |
| 3 | biosynthetic process | 4 | AJ623499, AJ516541, AJ624625, AJ625979 | |
| 5 | ion transport | 2 | AJ623499, AJ624625 | |
| 3 | regulation of biological process | 2 | AJ516886, AJ624894 | |
| 4 | generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 2 | AJ623499, AJ624625 | |
|
| 5 | signal transduction | 5 | AJ625058, AJ623860, AJ624502, AJ624437, AJ625339 |
| 3 | multicellular organismal development | 9 | AJ626467, AJ625058, AJ624878, AJ626179, AJ624502, AJ625655, AJ624125, AJ625893, AJ624437 | |
| 2 | growth | 2 | AJ624878, AJ626179 | |
| 4 | cell differentiation | 2 | AJ625058, AJ624502 | |
| 3 | anatomical structure development | 3 | AJ625058, AJ624502, AJ625655 | |
| 2 | cellular component organization | 3 | AJ625058, AJ624502, AJ625655 | |
| 4 | anatomical structure morphogenesis | 3 | AJ625058, AJ624502, AJ625655 | |
|
| 4 | Protein metabolic process | 5 | AJ625244, AJ624144, AJ624363, AJ624341, AJ516741 |
| 3 | organelle organization | 3 | AJ516600, AJ516663, AJ516582 | |
| 3 | regulation of biological process | 6 | AJ516600, AJ516735, AJ516895, AJ516759, AJ625244, AJ624834 | |
| 2 | growth | 3 | AJ516895, AJ516600, AJ516759 | |
| 4 | gene expression | 3 | AJ516600, AJ625244, AJ623532 | |
| 2 | catabolic process | 4 | AJ625903, AJ625142, AJ624454, AJ624363 | |
| 4 | anatomical structure morphogenesis | 2 | AJ516600, AJ516735 | |
| 3 | cellular macromolecule biosynthetic process | 2 | AJ516600, AJ516735 | |
| 2 | multicellular organismal development | 3 | AJ516735, AJ516895, AJ516600 | |
|
| 3 | response to stress | 2 | AJ623546, AJ624410 |
|
| 3 | catabolic process | 3 | AJ625903, AJ625142, AJ624454 |
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 2 | AJ625903, AJ625142 | |
| 2 | cellular process organization | 2 | AJ625862, AJ624454 | |
| 6 | translation | 9 | AJ625894, AJ624593, AJ625505, AJ624922, AJ626199, AJ624426, AJ624925, AJ624454, AJ626374 | |
| 3 | regulation of biological process | 2 | AJ624454, AJ625862 | |
| 4 | generation of precursor metabolites and energy | 2 | AJ625903, AJ625142 | |
|
| 6 | transcription | 3 | AJ624130, AJ625043, AJ625243 |
| 3 | regulation of biological process | 3 | AJ624130, AJ625043, AJ625243 | |
|
| 5 | cellular protein process | 2 | AJ624501, AJ624087 |
|
| 4 | symbiosis, encompassing mutualismthrough parasitism | 2 | AJ624509, AJ623481 |
Gene Ontology terms enrichment analysis was carried out comparing the GO term frequency distribution into each cluster against that in the whole microarray set (hypergeometric statistics, p<0.05). Only the lowest node per branch of the hierarchical structure of the Gene Ontology that fulfills the filter condition - cut off 2 sequences- was reported. Cluster 1 and 4 were merged into a unique group as they presented the same temporal expression patterns and only differed for the intensity. Shown are: Cluster, the number of cluster obtained from k-means analysis (see Figure 3); Level, level in the GO tee of biological processes; GO Term, over-represented feature; N, number of mussel sequences associated to each GO term; Gene ID, EMBL accession number of each sequence found.
GO term over-representation analysis of sex specific genes in the digestive tissue across the four stage of gonadal development.
| Stage | Level | GO Term | N | Gene ID |
|
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 7 | AJ624093, AJ625778, AJ624637, AJ625361, AJ625051, AJ623376, AJ625276 |
| 6 | translation | 8 | AJ625361, AJ516364, AJ624922, AJ625505, AJ625894,AJ516444, AJ626199, AJ625269 | |
| 2 | regulation of biological process | 3 | AJ516444, AJ626199, AJ625269 | |
| 3 | catabolic process | 6 | AJ624093, AJ625778, AJ624637, AJ625051, AJ623376,AJ625525 | |
|
| 3 | primary metabolic process | 5 | AJ626199, AJ626374, AJ625487, AJ625525, AJ626329 |
| 3 | regulation of biological process | 3 | AJ626199, AJ626374, AJ625487 | |
| 2 | cellular process | 3 | AJ625525, AJ623925, AJ626329 | |
| 3 | biosynthetic process | 4 | AJ625525, AJ626199, AJ626374, AJ625487 | |
|
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 6 | AJ624093, AJ625569, AJ624637, AJ625051, AJ623376,AJ625276 |
| 3 | catabolic process | 5 | AJ624093, AJ625569, AJ624637, AJ625051, AJ623376 | |
|
| 4 | carbohydrate metabolic process | 4 | AJ625569, AJ625778, AJ623376, AJ625276 |
| 2 | cellular process | 3 | AJ624894, AJ625425, AJ623925 | |
| 2 | cellular component organization | 3 | AJ623925, AJ625425, AJ624894 | |
| 3 | catabolic process | 4 | AJ625569, AJ625778, AJ623376, AJ624894 |
Gene Ontology terms enrichment analysis was carried out comparing the GO term frequency distribution into each cluster against that in the whole microarray set (hypergeometric statistics, p<0.05). Only the lowest node per branch of the hierarchical structure of the Gene Ontology that fulfills the filter condition - cut off 3 sequences- was reported. Showed are: Stage, developmental stage of gonad; Level, level in the GO tree of biological processes; GO Term, over-represented feature; N, number of mussel sequences associated to each GO term; Gene ID, EMBL accession number of each sequence found.the over-represented GO terms in males versus females (hypergeometric stats, p<0.05).
Figure 4mRNA abundance patterns across female gonad maturation in mantles.
Shown are representative images of the reproductive stage of female gonad (1: Early stage-November 2007, 2: Development -January 2008, 3: Ripe -February 2008, and 4: Spawning -March 2008) determined according to [46], the heat map (B) (Pearson correlation, complete linkage algorithm) and the expression view plot (C) obtained for each stage vs the reference condition (stage I). 369 differentially expressed genes in at least one condition were considered for the analysis. Supporting information to Figure 4 is present in Dataset S4.
Figure 5mRNA abundance patterns across male gonad maturation in mantles.
Shown are representative images of the reproductive stage of male gonad (1: Early stage-November 2007, 2: Development -January 2008, 3: Ripe -February 2008, and 4: Spawning -March 2008) determined according to [46], the heat map (B) (Pearson correlation, complete linkage algorithm) and the transcription view plot (C) representing the log2 relative expression obtained for each stage vs reference condition (stage I). 354 differentially expressed genes in at least one condition were considered for the analysis. Supporting information to Figure 5 is present on Dataset S5.