Literature DB >> 21623061

Percutaneous vertebroplasty complications.

Nizar A Al-Nakshabandi1.   

Abstract

Percutaneous vertebroplasty, among various other options, has become a mainstay in the management of osteoporotic and malignant vertebral fractures. The purpose of this article is to describe complications arising from the procedure, which can be classified as mild, which may include a temporary increase in pain and transient hypotension; moderate, including infection and extravasation of cement into the foraminal, epidural or dural space; and severe such as cement leakage in the paravertebral veins, leading to pulmonary embolism, cardiac perforation, cerebral embolism or even death. Vertebroplasty is not a procedure without complications. The article defines them and describes methods to minimize them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21623061      PMCID: PMC3119972          DOI: 10.4103/0256-4947.81542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Saudi Med        ISSN: 0256-4947            Impact factor:   1.526


Percutaneous vertebroplasty, among various other options, has become a mainstay in the management of osteoporotic and malignant vertebral fractures. When vertebroplasty is performed, careful attention to the anatomic structures is of utmost importance. Mild complications include temporary pain after the procedure and cement leakage in the intervertebral disc space and into paravertebral soft tissues. Moderate complications include infection and cement leak into the epidural space. Severe complications include leak into the paravertebral veins, leading to pulmonary embolism, cerebral embolism or cardiac perforation. The complications of vertebroplasty can be classified as follows: mild, moderate and severe.

Mild complications

The following are considered mild complications: a temporary increase in pain after the procedure; transient arterial hypotension; cement leakage into the intervertebral disc space, of little or no clinical consequence, or into the paravertebral soft tissues; and an increased risk for new fractures. Temporary increase in pain following vertebroplasty is infrequently encountered. It is a consequence of inflammatory reaction due to heat generated by polymerization of methyl methacrylate.1 Although it rarely lasts for more than a few hours, it can be easily managed with analgesics (steroidal or nonsteroidal). Transient arterial hypotension is a rare complication2 that can be induced by polymethyl methacrylate injection during percutaneous vertebroplasty; and although there is no clear explanation of the mechanism, it responds well to supportive measures and is self-limited. Cement leakage into the disc during vertebroplasty (Figure 1), although of no definite clinical consequence, has a theoretical increase in the risk of subsequent fractures of adjacent vertebral bodies3 ; therefore, it is advised to place the needle laterally and far from the center of the vertebra in a centrally located fracture,34 and to adjust the cement consistency so that the cement is more viscous, making it less prone to leak.5 Furthermore, adjusting to smaller volumes of cement may also decrease the risk of leakage (and probably still provide sufficient stability and pain relief6 ; in addition, cessation of injection immediately when disc leakage occurs may be of benefit.7 Cement leakage into the paravertebral soft tissues occurs in 6% to 52% of cases8 and is usually of no clinical significance, with rare reports of peripheral neuropathy (Figures 2a, b). A substantial number of patients with osteoporosis develop new fractures after the procedure; two-thirds of these new fractures occur in a vertebra adjacent to those previously treated (Figure 3).9
Figure 1

Lateral fluoroscopic view in a 49-year-old man with osteoporotic fracture of L3. Needle is in the anterior aspect of the vertebral body with cement extravasating into the L2/3 disc space (arrow).

Figure 2

(a) Axial CT scan of a 19-year-old female with heavy steroid use for Wegner granulomatosis, 30 minutes post-vertebroplasty, showing cement leak into the paravertebral soft tissues (arrows) and muscles. (b) Sagittal reformat CT scan in the same patient; arrow shows the extent of the leak.

Figure 3

Coronal reformat CT shows a new fracture of T11 (arrow) in a 66-year-old osteoporotic woman who had undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty of T9 and T10 3 months ago, presenting with new severe back pain.

Lateral fluoroscopic view in a 49-year-old man with osteoporotic fracture of L3. Needle is in the anterior aspect of the vertebral body with cement extravasating into the L2/3 disc space (arrow). (a) Axial CT scan of a 19-year-old female with heavy steroid use for Wegner granulomatosis, 30 minutes post-vertebroplasty, showing cement leak into the paravertebral soft tissues (arrows) and muscles. (b) Sagittal reformat CT scan in the same patient; arrow shows the extent of the leak. Coronal reformat CT shows a new fracture of T11 (arrow) in a 66-year-old osteoporotic woman who had undergone percutaneous vertebroplasty of T9 and T10 3 months ago, presenting with new severe back pain.

Moderate complications

These include infection, cement leak into the epidural/ foraminal space and misplaced needle in the tract. Infection is a risk in any percutaneous procedure. It is a complication that can be eliminated or minimized. Possible results of infection are discitis, osteomyelitis; or even an epidural infection10 can occur and can be catastrophic with surgery required to remove the cement which serves as a nidus for infection.11 Extravasation of cement into the epidural (Figure 4) or foraminal space (Figure 5) is a rare complication. Most cases are clinically silent if not for post-procedure CT. The prevalence may be as high as 40%.812–14 Chiras et al15 reported paraplegia due to cement-related spinal cord compression to occur in only 0.4% of patients. Needle traversing of the lamina instead of the pedicle can occur, especially in the thoracic vertebra, where the pedicle is smaller, and can lead to catastrophic complications (Figure 6).
Figure 4

Lateral fluoroscopic image during placement of an osteoplasty needle for vertebroplasty of T11 in a 49-year-old osteoporotic man. Arrow shows an epidural leak.

Figure 5

CT scan of the thoracolumbar spine post-vertebroplasty. Arrow points to the foraminal leak.

Figure 6

CT scan of the thoracic spine in a 79-year-old woman who underwent vertebroplasty of T11. Arrow points to lamina puncture instead of pedicle in this post-procedure CT.

Lateral fluoroscopic image during placement of an osteoplasty needle for vertebroplasty of T11 in a 49-year-old osteoporotic man. Arrow shows an epidural leak. CT scan of the thoracolumbar spine post-vertebroplasty. Arrow points to the foraminal leak. CT scan of the thoracic spine in a 79-year-old woman who underwent vertebroplasty of T11. Arrow points to lamina puncture instead of pedicle in this post-procedure CT.

Severe complications

Severe complications are usually related to cement leakage into the paravertebral veins leading to pulmonary embolism, cardiac perforation, cerebral embolism and even death. Paravertebral venous leak can be due to a combination of highly vascular lesions and liquid consistency of the cement. This leak may also produce radicular pain (Figure 7). Pulmonary cement embolism (Figure 8) is a rare complication of vertebroplasty.16 It can be asymptomatic and is reported to occur in up to 4.6% of the cases and is directly related to the frequency of paravertebral venous leak, but not to the number of vertebral bodies treated.17 If symptomatic, then classical findings of chest discomfort, hypotension, dyspnea would be observed.18 Onset can be immediate or delayed and ultimately can lead to death.19 It is managed with oxygen inhalation; short-term anticoagulation therapy; IV steroid therapy; or in severe cases, IV steroid therapy with catheter-aided interventional techniques.19–21
Figure 7

Lateral fluoroscopic view in a 77-year-old osteoporotic woman who suffered a fracture of T11 and T12, with arrow pointing to a paravertebral venous leak.

Figure 8

Non-enhanced CT scan of chest done in a 45-year-old woman who underwent vertebroplasty of L4 the previous day. She was complaining of chest pain and dyspnea. Arrow points to a pulmonary cement embolus.

Cardiac perforation is an extremely rare complication of vertebroplasty, with only one case report in the literature, and is potentially fatal and a cause of hemopericardium and tamponade.22 Cerebral embolus has been reported to occur and is attributed to fat emboli from raised intramedullary pressure during cementation.23 When systemic embolus is seen, it is attributed to paradoxical cerebral arterial embolization of cement via a patent foramen ovale.24 Sudden cardiovascular collapse and death during this procedure have been reported. Autopsy results demonstrate fat, bone spicules, and polymethyl methacrylate in the lungs.25 Lateral fluoroscopic view in a 77-year-old osteoporotic woman who suffered a fracture of T11 and T12, with arrow pointing to a paravertebral venous leak. Non-enhanced CT scan of chest done in a 45-year-old woman who underwent vertebroplasty of L4 the previous day. She was complaining of chest pain and dyspnea. Arrow points to a pulmonary cement embolus.

Techniques to minimize complications

Techniques include (a) choosing a transpedicular route in the lumbar spine and choosing the costovertebral junction in the thoracic spine, (b) avoiding a cortical breach whenever possible, (c) optimizing opacification of cement by following the manufacturer recommendations and by not altering recommended proportions of powder polymer and liquid polymer, and (d) defining optimal cement viscosity before injection. If cement leakage occurs, cessation of the procedure is recommended.26
  23 in total

1.  Is insufficient use of polymethylmethacrylate a cause for vertebroplasty failure necessitating repeat vertebroplasty?

Authors:  Louis Gilula
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Cardiovascular collapse and death during vertebroplasty.

Authors:  Jack C Childers
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [Percutaneous vertebral surgery. Technics and indications].

Authors:  J Chiras; C Depriester; A Weill; M T Sola-Martinez; H Deramond
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 3.447

4.  Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects.

Authors:  M E Jensen; A J Evans; J M Mathis; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; J E Dion
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Pulmonary embolism of polymethyl methacrylate during percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty.

Authors:  Du Hwan Choe; Edith M Marom; Kamran Ahrar; Mylene T Truong; John E Madewell
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with pulmonary cement embolism following percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate.

Authors:  Kyung Y Yoo; Seong W Jeong; Woong Yoon; JongUn Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Echocardiography of transatrial embolism during cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  J Christie; R Burnett; H R Potts; A C Pell
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1994-05

8.  Paraplegia complicating percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fracture: case report.

Authors:  Nilo M Lopes; Vinicius K Lopes
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2004-10-05       Impact factor: 1.420

9.  Serious pyogenic spondylitis following vertebroplasty--a case report.

Authors:  Shang-Won Yu; Wen-Jer Chen; Wei-Ching Lin; Yeung-Jen Chen; Yuan-Kun Tu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methyl methacrylate at clinical follow-up.

Authors:  A Cotten; F Dewatre; B Cortet; R Assaker; D Leblond; B Duquesnoy; P Chastanet; J Clarisse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  21 in total

1.  New vertebral fractures after vertebroplasty: 2-year results from a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M P Staples; B M Howe; M D Ringler; P Mitchell; C H R Wriedt; J D Wark; P R Ebeling; R H Osborne; D F Kallmes; R Buchbinder
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.617

2.  Effectiveness of a bone substitute (CERAMENT™) as an alternative to PMMA in percutaneous vertebroplasty: 1-year follow-up on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Stefano Marcia; Claudia Boi; Mario Dragani; Stefano Marini; Mariangela Marras; Emanuele Piras; Giovanni Carlo Anselmetti; Salvatore Masala
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  What's new in vertebral cementoplasty?

Authors:  Mario Muto; Gianluigi Guarnieri; Francesco Giurazza; Luigi Manfrè
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  Third-generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation systems.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Renato Galzio; Anna Kazakova; Andrea Pantalone; Giovanni Grillea; Marcello Bartolo; Vincenzo Salini; Vincenzo Magliani
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-03

5.  A Colombian experience involving SpineJack®, a consecutive series of patients experiencing spinal fractures, percutaneous approach and anatomical restoration 2016-2017.

Authors:  Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya; Christian Torres; Esteban Ramírez Ferrer; Erik Edgardo Muñoz Rodríguez
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-06

7.  Complications and healthcare utilization in commercially-insured osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients: a comparison of kyphoplasty versus propensity-matched controls.

Authors:  Laura S Gold; Michael K O'Reilly; Patrick J Heagerty; Jeffrey G Jarvik
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Evaluating Treatment Strategies for Spinal Lesions in Multiple Myeloma: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Manan Sunil Patel; Alexander Ghasem; Dylan N Greif; Samuel R Huntley; Sheila A Conway; Motasem Al Maaieh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-10-15

Review 9.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.

Authors:  Rachelle Buchbinder; Renea V Johnston; Kobi J Rischin; Joanne Homik; C Allyson Jones; Kamran Golmohammadi; David F Kallmes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-04

10.  New perspective for third generation percutaneous vertebral augmentation procedures: Preliminary results at 12 months.

Authors:  Daniele Vanni; Andrea Pantalone; Francesco Bigossi; Filippo Pineto; Danilo Lucantoni; Vincenzo Salini
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.