Literature DB >> 21622947

Effect of flexural and torsional wing flexibility on lift generation in hoverfly flight.

Hiroto Tanaka1, John P Whitney, Robert J Wood.   

Abstract

The effect of wing flexibility in hoverflies was investigated using an at-scale mechanical model. Unlike dynamically-scaled models, an at-scale model can include all phenomena related to motion and deformation of the wing during flapping. For this purpose, an at-scale polymer wing mimicking a hoverfly was fabricated using a custom micromolding process. The wing has venation and corrugation profiles which mimic those of a hoverfly wing and the measured flexural stiffness of the artificial wing is comparable to that of the natural wing. To emulate the torsional flexibility at the wing-body joint, a discrete flexure hinge was created. A range of flexure stiffnesses was chosen to match the torsional stiffness of pronation and supination in a hoverfly wing. The polymer wing was compared with a rigid, flat, carbon-fiber wing using a flapping mechanism driven by a piezoelectric actuator. Both wings exhibited passive rotation around the wing hinge; however, these rotations were reduced in the case of the compliant polymer wing due to chordwise deformations during flapping which caused a reduced effective angle of attack. Maximum lift was achieved when the stiffness of the hinge was similar to that of a hoverfly in both wing cases and the magnitude of measured lift is sufficient for hovering; the maximum lift achieved by the single polymer and carbon-fiber wings was 5.9 × 10(2)( )μN and 6.9 × 10(2)( )μN, respectively. These results suggest that hoverflies could exploit intrinsic compliances to generate desired motions of the wing and that, for the same flapping motions, a rigid wing could be more suitable for producing large lift.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622947     DOI: 10.1093/icb/icr051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  8 in total

Review 1.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

Review 2.  Dynamic experimental rigs for investigation of insect wing aerodynamics.

Authors:  Paul Broadley; Mostafa R A Nabawy; Mark K Quinn; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 4.293

3.  Wing flexibility enhances load-lifting capacity in bumblebees.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Aerodynamic Ground Effect in Fruitfly Sized Insect Takeoff.

Authors:  Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Masateru Maeda; Thomas Engels; Hao Liu; Kai Schneider; Jean-Christophe Nave
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Allometry of wing twist and camber in a flower chafer during free flight: How do wing deformations scale with body size?

Authors:  Yonatan Meresman; Gal Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Morphological diversification has led to inter-specific variation in elastic wing deformation during flight in scarab beetles.

Authors:  Y Meresman; J F Husak; R Ben-Shlomo; G Ribak
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 7.  Wing Design in Flies: Properties and Aerodynamic Function.

Authors:  Swathi Krishna; Moonsung Cho; Henja-Niniane Wehmann; Thomas Engels; Fritz-Olaf Lehmann
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.769

8.  Computational Aerodynamic Analysis of a Micro-CT Based Bio-Realistic Fruit Fly Wing.

Authors:  Joshua Brandt; Graham Doig; Naomi Tsafnat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.