Literature DB >> 21622011

Reliability of superficial surgical site infections as a hospital quality measure.

Lillian S Kao1, Amir A Ghaferi, Clifford Y Ko, Justin B Dimick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although rates of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) are increasingly used as measures of hospital quality, the statistical reliability of using SSI rates in this context is uncertain. We used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data to determine the reliability of SSI rates as a measure of hospital performance and to evaluate the effect of hospital caseload on reliability. STUDY
DESIGN: We examined all patients who underwent colon resection in hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in 2007 (n = 18,455 patients, n = 181 hospitals). We first calculated the number of cases and the risk-adjusted rate of SSI at each hospital. We then used hierarchical modeling to estimate the reliability of this quality measure for each hospital. Finally, we quantified the proportion of hospital-level variation in SSI rates due to patient characteristics and measurement noise.
RESULTS: The average number of colon resections per hospital was 102 (SD 65). The risk-adjusted rate of superficial SSI was 10.5%, but varied from 0 to 30% across hospitals. Approximately 35% of the variation in SSI rates was explained by noise, 7% could be attributed to patient characteristics, and the remaining 58% represented true differences in SSI rates. Just more than half of the hospitals (54%) had a reliability >0.70, which is considered a minimum acceptable level. To achieve this level of reliability, 94 cases were required.
CONCLUSIONS: SSI rates are a reliable measure of hospital quality when an adequate number of cases have been reported. For hospitals with inadequate caseloads, the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program sampling strategy could be altered to provide enough cases to ensure reliability.
Copyright © 2011 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21622011      PMCID: PMC3144290          DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  13 in total

1.  Surgical mortality as an indicator of hospital quality: the problem with small sample size.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; H Gilbert Welch; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Finding a method for optimizing risk adjustment when comparing surgical-site infection rates.

Authors:  Christian Brandt; Sonja Hansen; Dorit Sohr; Franz Daschner; Henning Rüden; Petra Gastmeier
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  The impact of adjusting for reliability on hospital quality rankings in vascular surgery.

Authors:  Nicholas H Osborne; Clifford Y Ko; Gilbert R Upchurch; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment.

Authors:  Justin B Dimick; Douglas O Staiger; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Complex surgical site infections and the devilish details of risk adjustment: important implications for public reporting.

Authors:  Deverick J Anderson; Luke F Chen; Daniel J Sexton; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.254

6.  Validating risk-adjusted surgical outcomes: site visit assessment of process and structure. National VA Surgical Risk Study.

Authors:  J Daley; M G Forbes; G J Young; M P Charns; J O Gibbs; K Hur; W Henderson; S F Khuri
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  Nosocomial infection rates for interhospital comparison: limitations and possible solutions. A Report from the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System.

Authors: 
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.254

8.  The unreliability of individual physician "report cards" for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease.

Authors:  T P Hofer; R A Hayward; S Greenfield; E H Wagner; S H Kaplan; W G Manning
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Physician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassification.

Authors:  John L Adams; Ateev Mehrotra; J William Thomas; Elizabeth A McGlynn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.

Authors:  Robert L Smith; Jamie K Bohl; Shannon T McElearney; Charles M Friel; Margaret M Barclay; Robert G Sawyer; Eugene F Foley
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  25 in total

1.  Profiling hospitals on bariatric surgery quality: which outcomes are most reliable?

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Jonathan F Finks; Wayne J English; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  The impact of depth of infection and postdischarge surveillance on rate of surgical-site infections in a network of community hospitals.

Authors:  David Y Ming; Luke F Chen; Becky A Miller; Deverick J Anderson
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.254

3.  Reliability of surgeon-specific reporting of complications after colectomy.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Adam I Cole; Paul M Al-Attar; Apurba Chakrabarti; Hussein A Fardous; Peter F Helvie; Michael T Kemp; Chris Lee; Eytan Shtull-Leber; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Outcomes are Local: Patient, Disease, and Procedure-Specific Risk Factors for Colorectal Surgical Site Infections from a Single Institution.

Authors:  Robert R Cima; John R Bergquist; Kristine T Hanson; Cornelius A Thiels; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Reliability of hospital cost profiles in inpatient surgery.

Authors:  Tyler R Grenda; Robert W Krell; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  The future of quality measurement in the United States.

Authors:  Fia Yi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2014-03

7.  Risk factors for deep surgical site infection following posterior instrumented fusion for degenerative diseases in the thoracic and/or lumbar spine: a multicenter, observational cohort study of 2913 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Satoshi Ogihara; Takashi Yamazaki; Michio Shiibashi; Hirotaka Chikuda; Toru Maruyama; Kota Miyoshi; Hirohiko Inanami; Yasushi Oshima; Seiichi Azuma; Naohiro Kawamura; Kiyofumi Yamakawa; Nobuhiro Hara; Jiro Morii; Rentaro Okazaki; Yujiro Takeshita; Sakae Tanaka; Kazuo Saita
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Reliability of surgical outcomes for predicting future hospital performance.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Douglas O Staiger; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Reliability of readmission rates as a hospital quality measure in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Terry Shih; Justin B Dimick
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Pediatric surgeon-directed wound classification improves accuracy.

Authors:  Tiffany J Zens; Deborah A Rusy; Ankush Gosain
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 2.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.