Timo K Nykopp1,2, Jose Batista da Costa2, Miles Mannas2, Peter C Black3. 1. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. 2. Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada. 3. Vancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Level 6, 2775 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V6N 2W6, Canada. pblack@mail.ubc.ca.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As our molecular understanding of bladder cancer continues to advance, more and more novel agents are entering clinical trials across the spectrum of bladder cancer stages. The clinical trial activity for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has been boosted further by the evolution of specific disease states that set more uniform inclusion criteria for clinical trial design. Here, we aimed to review the current clinical trials landscape in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with respect to these disease states. RECENT FINDINGS: Most active clinical trials focus on high-risk NMIBC in either the BCG-naïve or BCG-unresponsive setting. Strict criteria to define the disease state and a clear pathway to drug registration have encouraged trials for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. The most promising potential breakthroughs for BCG-naïve patients include alternative BCG strains, immune-priming with intradermal BCG vaccination, and systemic immune checkpoint blockade. The latter therapy is also being actively investigated in multiple trials in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, along with novel viral agents such as INSTILADRIN (nadofaragene firadenovec) and targeted agents such as oportuzumab monatox. After many years of relative stagnation, multiple new therapies currently under investigation in well-designed clinical trials appear poised for routine clinical implementation in the near future. These therapies should dramatically improve the outcome of patients with NMIBC. We can look forward to the challenges of biomarker-driven drug selection, optimal drug sequencing, and rational combination therapies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: As our molecular understanding of bladder cancer continues to advance, more and more novel agents are entering clinical trials across the spectrum of bladder cancer stages. The clinical trial activity for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has been boosted further by the evolution of specific disease states that set more uniform inclusion criteria for clinical trial design. Here, we aimed to review the current clinical trials landscape in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with respect to these disease states. RECENT FINDINGS: Most active clinical trials focus on high-risk NMIBC in either the BCG-naïve or BCG-unresponsive setting. Strict criteria to define the disease state and a clear pathway to drug registration have encouraged trials for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. The most promising potential breakthroughs for BCG-naïve patients include alternative BCG strains, immune-priming with intradermal BCG vaccination, and systemic immune checkpoint blockade. The latter therapy is also being actively investigated in multiple trials in BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, along with novel viral agents such as INSTILADRIN (nadofaragene firadenovec) and targeted agents such as oportuzumab monatox. After many years of relative stagnation, multiple new therapies currently under investigation in well-designed clinical trials appear poised for routine clinical implementation in the near future. These therapies should dramatically improve the outcome of patients with NMIBC. We can look forward to the challenges of biomarker-driven drug selection, optimal drug sequencing, and rational combination therapies.
Entities:
Keywords:
BCG-naïve; BCG-unresponsive; Clinical trial; Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer
Authors: James M McKiernan; Puneet Masson; Alana M Murphy; Manlio Goetzl; Carl A Olsson; Daniel P Petrylak; Manisha Desai; Mitchell C Benson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Peter R Rhode; Jack O Egan; Wenxin Xu; Hao Hong; Gabriela M Webb; Xiaoyue Chen; Bai Liu; Xiaoyun Zhu; Jinghai Wen; Lijing You; Lin Kong; Ana C Edwards; Kaiping Han; Sixiang Shi; Sarah Alter; Jonah B Sacha; Emily K Jeng; Weibo Cai; Hing C Wong Journal: Cancer Immunol Res Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 11.151
Authors: Cyrill A Rentsch; Frédéric D Birkhäuser; Claire Biot; Joël R Gsponer; Aurélie Bisiaux; Christian Wetterauer; Micheline Lagranderie; Gilles Marchal; Mickael Orgeur; Christiane Bouchier; Alexander Bachmann; Molly A Ingersoll; Roland Brosch; Matthew L Albert; George N Thalmann Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2014-03-12 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Richard J Sylvester; Willem Oosterlinck; Sten Holmang; Matthew R Sydes; Alison Birtle; Sigurdur Gudjonsson; Cosimo De Nunzio; Kikuo Okamura; Eero Kaasinen; Eduardo Solsona; Bedeir Ali-El-Dein; Can Ali Tatar; Brant A Inman; James N'Dow; Jorg R Oddens; Marek Babjuk Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jonathan E Rosenberg; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Tom Powles; Michiel S van der Heijden; Arjun V Balar; Andrea Necchi; Nancy Dawson; Peter H O'Donnell; Ani Balmanoukian; Yohann Loriot; Sandy Srinivas; Margitta M Retz; Petros Grivas; Richard W Joseph; Matthew D Galsky; Mark T Fleming; Daniel P Petrylak; Jose Luis Perez-Gracia; Howard A Burris; Daniel Castellano; Christina Canil; Joaquim Bellmunt; Dean Bajorin; Dorothee Nickles; Richard Bourgon; Garrett M Frampton; Na Cui; Sanjeev Mariathasan; Oyewale Abidoye; Gregg D Fine; Robert Dreicer Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Motoyuki Yamashita; Charles J Rosser; Jain-Hua Zhou; Xin-Qiao Zhang; Robert J Connor; Heidrun Engler; Daniel C Maneval; Takashi Karashima; Bogdan A Czerniak; Colin P N Dinney; William F Benedict Journal: Cancer Gene Ther Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 5.987
Authors: Maurizio Brausi; Jorg Oddens; Richard Sylvester; Aldo Bono; Cees van de Beek; George van Andel; Paolo Gontero; Levent Turkeri; Sandrine Marreaud; Sandra Collette; Willem Oosterlinck Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-07-24 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jamie B Oughton; Heather Poad; Maureen Twiddy; Michelle Collinson; Victoria Hiley; Kathryn Gordon; Mark Johnson; Sunjay Jain; Aidan P Noon; Rohit Chahal; Matt Simms; Mohantha Dooldeniya; Phillip Koenig; Louise Goodwin; Julia M Brown; James W F Catto Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Anthony C Antonelli; Anna Binyamin; Tobias M Hohl; Michael S Glickman; Gil Redelman-Sidi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Stefan Garczyk; Stephan Degener; Felix Bischoff; Tician Schnitzler; Anne Salz; Reinhard Golz; Alexander Buchner; Gerald B Schulz; Ursula Schneider; Nadine T Gaisa; Ruth Knüchel Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2022-04-28 Impact factor: 4.535
Authors: Francesca Sanguedolce; Magda Zanelli; Andrea Palicelli; Stefano Ascani; Maurizio Zizzo; Giorgia Cocco; Lars Björnebo; Anna Lantz; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Carrieri Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 6.208