Literature DB >> 21621321

Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.

Mohamed Abdel-Fattah1, John A Ford, Chou Phay Lim, Priya Madhuvrata.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) have been introduced for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI); however, concerns have been raised regarding their efficacy. No systematic reviews or meta-analyses have previously assessed these relatively new procedures.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the current evidence of effectiveness and safety of SIMS compared with standard midurethral slings (SMUS) (retropubic and transobturator tension-free vaginal tapes) in the management of female SUI. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a literature search from 1996 to January 2011. Meta-analysis of all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing SIMS versus SMUS was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data were analysed using Rev-Man 5. Primary outcomes were patient-reported and objective cure rates. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications, quality of life (QoL) changes, and costs to health services. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 758 women in nine RCTs with a mean follow-up of 9.5 mo were included. The mean age (52.3 vs 52.1 yr), body mass index (27.4 vs 27.7), and parity (2.4 and 2.4) were comparable for both groups. SIMS were associated with significantly lower patient-reported and objective cure rates at 6-12 mo compared with SMUS (risk ratio [RR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.99, and RR: 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97, respectively). SIMS were associated with significantly shorter operative time (weighed mean difference [WMD]: 8.67 min; 95% CI, 17.32 to -0.02), lower day 1 pain scores (WMD: 1.74; 95% CI, -2.58 to -0.09), and less postoperative groin pain (RR: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.04-0.72). Repeat continence surgery (RR: 6.72; 95% CI, 2.39-18.89) and de novo urgency incontinence (RR: 2.08; 95% CI, 1.01-4.28) were significantly higher in the SIMS group. There was no significant difference in the QoL scores between the groups (WMD: 33.46; 95% CI, -20.62 to 87.55). No studies compared cost to health services.
CONCLUSIONS: SIMS are associated with inferior patient-reported and objective cure rates on the short-term follow-up, as well as higher reoperation rates for SUI when compared with SMUS.
Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621321     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  35 in total

Review 1.  Slings in surgery of genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  Silvia Secco; Alessandro Crestani; Francesco Cattaneo; Vincenzo Ficarra; Filiberto Zattoni; Giacomo Novara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Stress urinary incontinence in women: Current and emerging therapeutic options.

Authors:  Samer Shamout; Lysanne Campeau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Anatomic relation between single-incision slings and the obturator vessels.

Authors:  Amy L O'Boyle; Christopher P Chung; Wilma Larsen
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-04

4.  Multicentre randomized trial of the Ajust™ single-incision sling compared to the Align™ transobturator tape sling.

Authors:  Jordi Sabadell; Marta Palau-Gené; Eva Huguet; Anabel Montero-Armengol; Sabina Salicrú; Jose L Poza
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 5.  Comparison between three mini-sling surgical procedures and the traditional transobturator vaginal tape technique for female stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  V Leanza; E Intagliata; A Leanza; F Ferla; G Leanza; R Vecchio
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

6.  Sling revision/removal for mesh erosion and urinary retention: long-term risk and predictors.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Virginia Pate; Cindy L Amundsen; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  A cohort study comparing a single-incision sling with a retropubic midurethral sling.

Authors:  Annetta M Madsen; Sherif A El-Nashar; Joshua L Woelk; Christopher J Klingele; John B Gebhart; Emanuel C Trabuco
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 2.894

8.  A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.

Authors:  Ozan Dogan; Aski Ellibes Kaya; Cigdem Pulatoglu; Alper Basbug; Murat Yassa
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Three-year results from a randomised trial of a retropubic mid-urethral sling versus the Miniarc single incision sling for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Maya Basu; Jonathan Duckett
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Three-dimensional ultrasound assessment and middle term efficacy of a single-incision sling.

Authors:  Federico Spelzini; Maria Cristina Cesana; Debora Verri; Serena Polizzi; Matteo Frigerio; Rodolfo Milani
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.