Literature DB >> 21620327

Measurement of shared decision making - a review of instruments.

Isabelle Scholl1, Marije Koelewijn-van Loon, Karen Sepucha, Glyn Elwyn, France Légaré, Martin Härter, Jörg Dirmaier.   

Abstract

The last years have seen a clear move towards shared decision making (SDM) and increased patient involvement in many countries. However, as the field of SDM research is still relatively young, new instruments for the measurement of (shared) decision making (process, outcome and surrounding elements) are constantly being developed. Thus, the aims of this structured review were to give an update on current developments regarding the measurement in the field of SDM, as well as to give a short overview of published and unpublished instruments. We conducted an electronic literature search in PubMed and the Web of Science database, performed hand searches of relevant journals and contacted key authors in the field. We found eight scales that have been subjected to further psychometric testing, eleven new and psychometrically tested instruments and nine developments that are still in the publishing process. The results show that there is a trend towards measuring SDM processes from a dyadic approach (assessing both the patient's and the clinician's perspective). More and more scales have been developed and tested in languages other than English, which indicates the growing research efforts in various countries. While reliability of most scales is good, they differ in their extent of validation. Further psychometric testing is needed, as well as the development of a theoretical measurement framework in order to improve consistency of measured constructs across research groups. 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620327     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  108 in total

1.  Measuring chronic condition self-management in an Australian community: factor structure of the revised Partners in Health (PIH) scale.

Authors:  David Smith; Peter Harvey; Sharon Lawn; Melanie Harris; Malcolm Battersby
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Comparison of Three Measures of Shared Decision Making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE Scales.

Authors:  Suzanne Brodney; Floyd J Fowler; Michael J Barry; Yuchiao Chang; Karen Sepucha
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care.

Authors:  Mike Slade
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Core domains of shared decision-making during psychiatric visits: scientific and preference-based discussions.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Marianne S Matthias; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2015-01

5.  Ways of coping and HIV disclosure among people living with HIV: mediation of decision self-efficacy and moderation by sex.

Authors:  Monique J Brown; Julianne M Serovich; Tanja C Laschober; Judy A Kimberly; Celia M Lescano
Journal:  AIDS Care       Date:  2019-04-12

Review 6.  Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument.

Authors:  Nicolas Couët; Sophie Desroches; Hubert Robitaille; Hugues Vaillancourt; Annie Leblanc; Stéphane Turcotte; Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.

Authors:  Jada G Hamilton; Sarah E Lillie; Dana L Alden; Laura Scherer; Megan Oser; Christine Rini; Miho Tanaka; John Baleix; Mikki Brewster; Simon Craddock Lee; Mary K Goldstein; Robert M Jacobson; Ronald E Myers; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Erika A Waters
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2016-08-26

8.  Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Authors:  Edward R Melnick; Marc A Probst; Elizabeth Schoenfeld; Sean P Collins; Maggie Breslin; Cheryl Walsh; Nathan Kuppermann; Pat Dunn; Benjamin S Abella; Dowin Boatright; Erik P Hess
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 9.  Shared decision-making and comparative effectiveness research for patients with chronic conditions: an urgent synergy for better health.

Authors:  Michael R Gionfriddo; Aaron L Leppin; Juan P Brito; Annie Leblanc; Nilay D Shah; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.744

10.  Women's perceptions of their involvement in treatment decision making for early stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Mary Ann O'Brien; Cathy Charles; Timothy J Whelan; Peter M Ellis; Amiram Gafni; Peter Lovrics
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-01-24       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.