Literature DB >> 21620326

Shared decision making in the United States: policy and implementation activity on multiple fronts.

Dominick L Frosch1, Benjamin W Moulton, Richard M Wexler, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Robert J Volk, Carrie A Levin.   

Abstract

Shared decision making in the United States has become an important element in health policy debates. The recently passed federal health care reform legislation includes several key provisions related to shared decision making (SDM) and patient decision support. Several states have passed or are considering legislation that incorporates SDM as a key component of improved health care provision. Research on SDM is funded by a range of public and private organizations. Non-profit, for-profit, academic and government organizations are developing decision support interventions for numerous conditions. Some interventions are publicly available; others are distributed to patients through health insurance and healthcare providers. A significant number of clinical implementation projects are underway to test and evaluate different ways of incorporating SDM and patient decision support into routine clinical care. Numerous professional organizations are advocating for SDM and social networking efforts are increasing their advocacy as well. Policy makers are intrigued by the potential of SDM to improve health care provision and potentially lower costs. The role of shared decision making in policy and practice will be part of the larger health care reform debate. 2011. Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21620326     DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes        ISSN: 1865-9217


  36 in total

1.  An exploratory mixed-methods crossover study comparing DVD- vs. Web-based patient decision support in three conditions: The importance of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Meghan C Halley; Katharine A S Rendle; Katherine A Gillespie; Katherine M Stanley; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  An integrated knowledge translation approach to develop a shared decision-making strategy for use by Inuit in cancer care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  J Jull; A Hizaka; A J Sheppard; A Kewayosh; P Doering; L MacLeod; G Joudain; J Plourde; D Dorschner; M Rand; M Habash; I D Graham
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Shared decision making and patient decision aids: knowledge, attitudes, and practices among Hawai'i physicians.

Authors:  Dana L Alden; John Friend; Maria B J Chun
Journal:  Hawaii J Med Public Health       Date:  2013-11

4.  Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice.

Authors:  Rachel Zeuner; Dominick L Frosch; Marie D Kuzemchak; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 5.  Shared decision-making and comparative effectiveness research for patients with chronic conditions: an urgent synergy for better health.

Authors:  Michael R Gionfriddo; Aaron L Leppin; Juan P Brito; Annie Leblanc; Nilay D Shah; Victor M Montori
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.744

6.  'They leave at least believing they had a part in the discussion': understanding decision aid use and patient-clinician decision-making through qualitative research.

Authors:  Kristina Tiedje; Nathan D Shippee; Anna M Johnson; Priscilla M Flynn; Dawn M Finnie; Juliette T Liesinger; Carl R May; Marianne E Olson; Jennifer L Ridgeway; Nilay D Shah; Barbara P Yawn; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2013-04-15

Review 7.  Shared Decision Making and Choice for Elective Surgical Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Emily F Boss; Nishchay Mehta; Neeraja Nagarajan; Anne Links; James R Benke; Zackary Berger; Ali Espinel; Jeremy Meier; Ellen A Lipstein
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.497

8.  Comparing the nine-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to the OPTION Scale - an attempt to establish convergent validity.

Authors:  Isabelle Scholl; Levente Kriston; Jörg Dirmaier; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 9.  Patient preferences for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a scoping review.

Authors:  Susan M Joy; Emily Little; Nisa M Maruthur; Tanjala S Purnell; John F P Bridges
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  The duality of option-listing in cancer care.

Authors:  Alexandra Tate; B J Rimel
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2019-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.