BACKGROUND: The elderly (age ≥65 years) comprise an increasing proportion of patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures and have distinct needs compared with the young. We postulated that the needs of the elderly require different processes of care than those required for the young to assure optimal outcomes. To explore this hypothesis, we evaluated 30-day outcomes following EGS procedures in the young and the elderly and determined whether hospital performance was consistent across these 2 age strata. STUDY DESIGN: With data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005 to 2008), regression models were constructed for serious morbidity and mortality for all patients undergoing EGS procedures and separately for young and elderly patients. These models allowed for estimation of the risk of adverse outcomes associated with advanced age and the generation of hospital-level observed to expected (O/E) ratios. We evaluated the correlation between hospital O/E ratios for the young and the elderly and the concordance of outlier status (hospitals with CIs of O/E ratios excluding 1) with weighted κ across these 2 age groups. RESULTS: Among 68,003 procedures at 186 hospitals, elderly patients had a higher crude and adjusted risk for serious morbidity (27.9% versus 9.7%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.24) and mortality (15.2% versus 2.5%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 2.29, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.51). When outcomes for elderly versus younger patients were compared, there was fair to moderate agreement on hospital performance for serious morbidity (r = 0.43; κ = 0.30) but not for mortality (r = 0.10; κ = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients are at substantially greater risk for adverse events following EGS procedures. Hospitals had only slight agreement in mortality outcomes in the elderly compared with those in young patients. Processes of care that may account for this disparity should be further investigated.
BACKGROUND: The elderly (age ≥65 years) comprise an increasing proportion of patients undergoing emergency general surgery (EGS) procedures and have distinct needs compared with the young. We postulated that the needs of the elderly require different processes of care than those required for the young to assure optimal outcomes. To explore this hypothesis, we evaluated 30-day outcomes following EGS procedures in the young and the elderly and determined whether hospital performance was consistent across these 2 age strata. STUDY DESIGN: With data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005 to 2008), regression models were constructed for serious morbidity and mortality for all patients undergoing EGS procedures and separately for young and elderly patients. These models allowed for estimation of the risk of adverse outcomes associated with advanced age and the generation of hospital-level observed to expected (O/E) ratios. We evaluated the correlation between hospital O/E ratios for the young and the elderly and the concordance of outlier status (hospitals with CIs of O/E ratios excluding 1) with weighted κ across these 2 age groups. RESULTS: Among 68,003 procedures at 186 hospitals, elderly patients had a higher crude and adjusted risk for serious morbidity (27.9% versus 9.7%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.24) and mortality (15.2% versus 2.5%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio 2.29, 95% CI 2.09 to 2.51). When outcomes for elderly versus younger patients were compared, there was fair to moderate agreement on hospital performance for serious morbidity (r = 0.43; κ = 0.30) but not for mortality (r = 0.10; κ = 0.17). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients are at substantially greater risk for adverse events following EGS procedures. Hospitals had only slight agreement in mortality outcomes in the elderly compared with those in young patients. Processes of care that may account for this disparity should be further investigated.
Authors: Kyle H Sheetz; Robert W Krell; Michael J Englesbe; John D Birkmeyer; Darrell A Campbell; Amir A Ghaferi Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Robert D Becher; Nitin Sukumar; Michael P DeWane; Marilyn J Stolar; Thomas M Gill; Kevin M Schuster; Adrian A Maung; Cheryl K Zogg; Kimberly A Davis Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Margaret Smith; Adnan Hussain; Jane Xiao; William Scheidler; Haritha Reddy; Kola Olugbade; Dustin Cummings; Michael Terjimanian; Greta Krapohl; Seth A Waits; Darrell Campbell; Michael J Englesbe Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Philip Davis; Jill Hayden; Jeremy Springer; Jonathon Bailey; Michele Molinari; Paul Johnson Journal: Can J Surg Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.089
Authors: Kyle H Sheetz; Seth A Waits; Robert W Krell; Darrell A Campbell; Michael J Englesbe; Amir A Ghaferi Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Robert D Becher; Michael P DeWane; Nitin Sukumar; Marilyn J Stolar; Thomas M Gill; Robert M Becher; Adrian A Maung; Kevin M Schuster; Kimberly A Davis Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-04-18 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Daniel J Stevens; Natalie S Blencowe; Philip J McElnay; Rhiannon C Macefield; Jelena Savović; Kerry N L Avery; Jane M Blazeby Journal: World J Surg Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 3.352