Literature DB >> 21619745

Patients' confidence in their GP before and after being diagnosed with cancer.

Mette B Larsen1, Rikke P Hansen, Frede Olesen, Peter Vedsted.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: General practice plays an important role in the cancer care pathway. The initial diagnostic phase may be crucial for the relationship between the patient and the GP. AIM: The aim was to describe whether patients' confidence in their GP changed after a cancer diagnosis, and analyse whether the change in confidence was associated with doctor delay. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Population-based cohort study with 1892 questionnaires sent to patients and their GPs in general practices in the former Aarhus County, Denmark.
METHOD: Information on patients' confidence in their GP was obtained from the patient questionnaire. Information on doctor delay was obtained from the GPs and defined as a period of 14 days or more from the date of first symptom presentation to the GP until cancer-specific investigation was initiated.
RESULTS: Before the cancer diagnosis, 88.4% of the patients had confidence in their GP, which decreased to 80.0% after the diagnosis (P<0.001); 15.8% of the patients who experienced no doctor delay reported a decrease in confidence after the cancer diagnosis, compared with 29.1% of the patients with a doctor delay (P<0.001). Patients presenting with alarm symptoms and experiencing doctor delay were 3.8 times more likely to lose confidence compared with those presenting with alarm symptoms who experienced no doctor delay (P = 0.048).
CONCLUSION: The majority of the patients had high levels of confidence in their GP before, as well as after, the cancer diagnosis. Nevertheless, a substantial amount had low confidence in the GP, especially when experiencing doctor delay in the initial phase of the pathway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21619745      PMCID: PMC3080226          DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  14 in total

Review 1.  Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?

Authors:  M A Hall; E Dugan; B Zheng; A K Mishra
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Organization and financing of the Danish health care system.

Authors:  Terkel Christiansen
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Primary care oncology: essential if high quality cancer care is to be achieved for all.

Authors:  Neil C Campbell; Una MacLeod; David Weller
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.267

4.  General practictioners' management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients-Cancer.

Authors:  V L Allgar; R D Neal
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.520

5.  [Patients' assessment of their general practitioners--the significance of patient characteristics. General results from the DanPEP--part I].

Authors:  Hanne N Heje; Frede Olesen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger       Date:  2010-04-12

Review 6.  Patients' trust in physicians: many theories, few measures, and little data.

Authors:  S D Pearson; L H Raeke
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Family physicians' roles in cancer care. Survey of patients on a provincial cancer registry.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Sisler; Judith Belle Brown; Moira Stewart
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Factors associated with patients' trust in their general practitioner: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Carolyn Tarrant; Tim Stokes; Richard Baker
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  General practitioners and cancer control.

Authors:  Brian R McAvoy
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 7.738

10.  Patient characteristics associated with differences in patients' evaluation of their general practitioner.

Authors:  Hanne Nørgaard Heje; Peter Vedsted; Ineta Sokolowski; Frede Olesen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 2.655

View more
  13 in total

1.  Risk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Rachel M Dommett; Theresa Redaniel; Michael C G Stevens; Richard M Martin; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  An Association of Cancer Physicians' strategy for improving services and outcomes for cancer patients.

Authors:  Richard Baird; Ian Banks; David Cameron; John Chester; Helena Earl; Mark Flannagan; Adam Januszewski; Richard Kennedy; Sarah Payne; Emlyn Samuel; Hannah Taylor; Roshan Agarwal; Samreen Ahmed; Caroline Archer; Ruth Board; Judith Carser; Ellen Copson; David Cunningham; Rob Coleman; Adam Dangoor; Graham Dark; Diana Eccles; Chris Gallagher; Adam Glaser; Richard Griffiths; Geoff Hall; Marcia Hall; Danielle Harari; Michael Hawkins; Mark Hill; Peter Johnson; Alison Jones; Tania Kalsi; Eleni Karapanagiotou; Zoe Kemp; Janine Mansi; Ernie Marshall; Alex Mitchell; Maung Moe; Caroline Michie; Richard Neal; Tom Newsom-Davis; Alison Norton; Richard Osborne; Gargi Patel; John Radford; Alistair Ring; Emily Shaw; Rod Skinner; Dan Stark; Sam Turnbull; Galina Velikova; Jeff White; Alison Young; Johnathan Joffe; Peter Selby
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2016-01-05

3.  Facilitators and barriers to shared primary and specialist cancer care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Karolina Lisy; Jennifer Kent; Amanda Piper; Michael Jefford
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Patients with cancer and change of general practice: a Danish population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Kasper Grooss; Peter Hjertholm; Anders H Carlsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Factors related with symptom duration until diagnosis and treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Magdalena Esteva; Alfonso Leiva; María Ramos; Salvador Pita-Fernández; Luis González-Luján; Montse Casamitjana; María A Sánchez; Sonia Pértega-Díaz; Amador Ruiz; Paloma Gonzalez-Santamaría; María Martín-Rabadán; Ana M Costa-Alcaraz; Alejandro Espí; Francesc Macià; Josep M Segura; Sergio Lafita; Francisco Arnal-Monreal; Isabel Amengual; Marta M Boscá-Watts; Angels Hospital; Hermini Manzano; Rosa Magallón
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  Features of childhood cancer in primary care: a population-based nested case-control study.

Authors:  R M Dommett; M T Redaniel; M C G Stevens; W Hamilton; R M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  A differentiated approach to referrals from general practice to support early cancer diagnosis - the Danish three-legged strategy.

Authors:  P Vedsted; F Olesen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Features of cancer in teenagers and young adults in primary care: a population-based nested case-control study.

Authors:  R M Dommett; M T Redaniel; M C G Stevens; W Hamilton; R M Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: Danish Cancer in Primary Care cohort.

Authors:  Henry Jensen; Marie Louise Tørring; Mette Bach Larsen; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Pre-referral general practitioner consultations and subsequent experience of cancer care: evidence from the English Cancer Patient Experience Survey.

Authors:  S C Mendonca; G A Abel; C L Saunders; J Wardle; G Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 2.520

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.