| Literature DB >> 21619576 |
Abstract
Several theories of the underlying mechanisms of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) have been proposed. These theories have born relatively narrow beach-head research programs attracting generous research funding sustained for many years at expense to the public purse. This perspective endeavors to critically examine the evidence and bases of these theories and determine their plausibility; and questions whether or not a safe and reasoned hypothesis lies at their foundation. The Opinion sets specific criteria by asking the following questions: 1. Does the hypothesis take into account the key pathological findings in SIDS? 2. Is the hypothesis congruent with the key epidemiological risk factors? 3. Does it link 1 and 2? Falling short of any one of these answers, by inference, would imply insufficient grounds for a sustainable hypothesis. Some of the hypotheses overlap, for instance, notional respiratory failure may encompass apnea, prone sleep position, and asphyxia which may be seen to be linked to co-sleeping. For the purposes of this paper, each element will be assessed on the above criteria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21619576 PMCID: PMC3127778 DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-64
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Incidence of intrathoracic petechial haemorrhages in SIDS and comparison cases
| No. SIDS cases | Frequency of petechiae | Non-SIDS comparisons | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31 | 80% | absent or sparse in infant suffocation, CO asphyxia, drowning | Werne & Garrow [ |
| 12 | 100% | none | Handforth [ |
| 97 | 95% | rare in infanticide, accidents | Jacobsen and Voight [ |
| 80 | 79% | 6 of 43 (14%) | Geertinger [ |
| 91 | 94% | 10 of 31 (32%) in no case were they numerous | Cooke&Welsh [ |
| 162 | 68% | 12 of 42 (29%) | Marshall [ |
| 109 | 87% | 16 of 38 (42%) | Beckwith [ |
| 100 | 85% | none | Krous [ |
| 622 | 82% | 39 of 65 (60%) | Valdes-Dapena |
| 63 | 87% | 13 of 33 (39%)# | Risse & Weiler [ |
| 174 | 62.7* to 89.55%# | 18 of 67 (26.8%)+ - 31 of 67 (47.7%)** | Goldwater [ |
| 311 | 70%# | 42 of 80 (52.5%)# | Fracasso |
| 250 | 91% | 29 of 69 (42%) | Kleeman |
* + % with petechiae present in all three organs; # ** % with petechiae present in/on thymus
Final analysis
| Hypothesis | 1. Does the hypothesis take into account the key pathological findings? | 2. Is the hypothesis congruent with the key epidemiological risk factors? | 3. Does the hypothesis link 1 and 2? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brainstem control of respiratory function | No | No | No |
| Brainstem control of cardiac function | Partly | Yes | Partly |
| Respiratory obstruction/unintentional asphyxia | No | Partly | No |
| Common bacterial toxins | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Shock including anaphylaxis | Yes | Yes | Partly |
| Thermal stress | Partly | Yes | No |
| Diaphragm failure | Partly | Yes | Partly |
| CO2 rebreathing | No | No | No |
| toxic gases emitted from fungally colonized mattresses | No | No | No |
| Abuse | No | No | No |