Literature DB >> 21619497

Susceptibility of Candida species and various moulds to antimycotic drugs: use of epidemiological cutoff values according to EUCAST and CLSI in an 8-year survey.

Günter Rambach1, Heidemarie Oberhauser, Cornelia Speth, Cornelia Lass-Flörl.   

Abstract

A collection of 2,834 isolates of Candida spp. and 1,079 isolates of Aspergillus spp. and other moulds that were recovered between 2000 and 2007 in Tyrol, Austria, were examined for their susceptibility to antifungal drugs. The susceptibility of Candida spp. to amphotericin B (AMB), caspofungin (CPF), fluconazole (FLC), and voriconazole (VRC) were studied, while filamentous fungi were tested against AMB, CPF, VRC, itraconazole (ITC), and posaconazole (POS). As EUCAST and CLSI are currently revising their breakpoints for several antifungal agents, epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs) of these two guidelines were used to examine trends in susceptibility. For Candida spp. we noted increases in the percentage of non-wild type isolates which were resistant to CPF, FLC, and VRC. Most noticeably, we observed a change in: C. tropicalis (from 0.9-3.8%) and C. parapsilosis (from 4.0-6.0%) relative to CPF; C. parapsilosis (from 0.8-3.4%) and C. glabrata (from 11.0-20%) against FLC; and C. glabrata (from 3.0-12.0%) for VRC. Among the moulds, most Aspergillus spp. isolates were found to be susceptible to VRC, ITC, and POS, while AMB and POS were confirmed to be the most effective agents against zygomycetes. EUCAST and CLSI should continue their efforts to harmonize their methods of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) and to define additional and shareable epidemiological cutoff values and clinical breakpoints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21619497     DOI: 10.3109/13693786.2011.583943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Mycol        ISSN: 1369-3786            Impact factor:   4.076


  4 in total

1.  In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida Isolates with the EUCAST Methodology, a New Method for ECOFF Determination.

Authors:  J Meletiadis; I Curfs-Breuker; J F Meis; J W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Laboratory diagnostics of invasive fungal infections: an overview with emphasis on molecular approach.

Authors:  Lenka Bašková; Vladimír Buchta
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 2.099

Review 3.  Amphotericin B and Other Polyenes-Discovery, Clinical Use, Mode of Action and Drug Resistance.

Authors:  Hans Carolus; Siebe Pierson; Katrien Lagrou; Patrick Van Dijck
Journal:  J Fungi (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-27

4.  In vitro fluconazole and voriconazole susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates in Korea: use of the CLSI and EUCAST epidemiological cutoff values.

Authors:  Min Joong Jang; Jong Hee Shin; Wee Gyo Lee; Mi-Na Kim; Kyungwon Lee; Hye Soo Lee; Mi-Kyung Lee; Chulhun L Chang; Hee-Chang Jang; Eun Song Song; Soo Hyun Kim; Myung-Geun Shin; Soon-Pal Suh; Dong-Wook Ryang
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.