Literature DB >> 21617175

Republished paper: assessing and improving safety culture throughout an academic medical centre: a prospective cohort study.

Lori A Paine1, Beryl J Rosenstein, J Bryan Sexton, Paula Kent, Christine G Holzmueller, Peter J Pronovost.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To describe the authors' hospital-wide efforts to improve safety climate at a large academic medical centre. DESIGN AND SETTING A prospective cohort study used multiple interventions to improve hospital-wide safety climate. 144 clinical units in an urban academic medical centre are included in this analysis. Interventions The comprehensive unit-based safety programme included steps to identify hazards, partner units with a senior executive to fix hazards, learn from defects, and implement communication and teamwork tools. Hospital-level interventions were also implemented. Main outcome measures Safety climate was assessed annually using the safety attitudes questionnaire. The safety culture goal was to meet or exceed the 60% minimum positive score or improve the score by ≥10 points. RESULTS Response rates were 77% (2006) and 79% (2008). For safety climate, 55% of units in 2006 and 82% in 2008 achieved the culture goal. For teamwork climate, 61% of units in 2006 and 83% in 2008 achieved the culture goal. The mean safety climate improvement (difference score) for 79 units at or above 60% in 2006 was 0.201 in 2008; the mean improvement for the 65 units below the threshold was 18.278. The mean teamwork climate improvement (difference score) for the 89 units at or above 60% in 2006 was 0.452 in 2008; the mean improvement for the 55 units below the threshold was 16.176. Climate scores improved significantly from 2006 to 2008 in every domain except stress recognition. CONCLUSIONS Hospital-wide interventions were associated with improvements in safety climate at a large academic medical centre.

Year:  2011        PMID: 21617175     DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2009.039347rep

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  5 in total

1.  Could low Safety Attitudes Questionnaire scores be indicative of an environment where it may be difficult to get new training practices established?

Authors:  Sarah Channing; Neil Ryan; Sophie Barnes; Kate Collins; Helen van der Nelson; Jane Mears; Dimitrios Siassakos
Journal:  BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn       Date:  2017-04-05

2.  Systematic simulation-based team training in a Swedish intensive care unit: a diverse response among critical care professions.

Authors:  Lisbet Meurling; Leif Hedman; Christer Sandahl; Li Felländer-Tsai; Carl-Johan Wallin
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 7.035

3.  Crew Resource Management in the Intensive Care Unit: a prospective 3-year cohort study.

Authors:  M H T M Haerkens; M Kox; J Lemson; S Houterman; J G van der Hoeven; P Pickkers
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Crew resource management in the ICU: the need for culture change.

Authors:  Marck Htm Haerkens; Donald H Jenkins; Johannes G van der Hoeven
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 6.925

5.  The virgin land of quality management: a first measure of patient safety climate at the National Hospital of the Faroe Islands.

Authors:  Solvejg Kristensen; Naina Túgvustein; Hjørdis Zachariassen; Svend Sabroe; Paul Bartels; Jan Mainz
Journal:  Drug Healthc Patient Saf       Date:  2016-04-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.