Literature DB >> 21616885

Embryonic inbreeding depression varies among populations and by mating system in Witheringia solanacea (Solanaceae).

Judy L Stone1, Emily E Wilson, Andrew S Kwak.   

Abstract

PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Embryonic inbreeding depression is a key influence on mating system evolution and can be difficult to estimate in self-incompatible species. A pollen chase experiment was used to estimate the magnitude of embryonic inbreeding depression in Costa Rican Witheringia solanacea, a species polymorphic for self-incompatibility (SI). In a pollen chase experiment, bud self-pollinations are followed after anthesis by outcross pollinations, with a comparable pair of outcross pollinations used as a control. Lowered seed set for the self-precedence treatment indicates embryonic inbreeding depression. •
METHODS: Embryonic inbreeding depression was assayed for self-compatible (SC) individuals and for SI plants from two populations that differ quantitatively in the onset and enzymatic activity of their SI response. Microsatellite markers were used to assay the selfing rate of a sample of surviving progeny from the prior self-pollination treatment. • KEY
RESULTS: SC individuals showed no evidence of embryonic inbreeding depression. In SI plants, prior self-pollination reduced seed number by 28-70%, depending on population. Microsatellite genotyping revealed that embryonic inbreeding depression was even more severe than estimated by the phenotypic data: for mature fruits resulting from self-pollination precedence, the majority of the progeny were the result of outcross fertilization. •
CONCLUSIONS: Lineage-specific purging of recessive lethals has accompanied the evolution of SC in this species. SI populations show contrasting levels of embryonic inbreeding depression, with nearly complete embryonic lethality upon selfing in the Monteverde population. In the face of high embryonic inbreeding depression, an increase in selfing rate can evidently occur only under severe pollen limitation.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 21616885      PMCID: PMC3673560          DOI: 10.3732/ajb.1000020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Bot        ISSN: 0002-9122            Impact factor:   3.844


  22 in total

1.  Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers.

Authors:  S Rozen; H Skaletsky
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2000

2.  An association between a floral trait and inbreeding depression.

Authors:  N Takebayashi; L F Delph
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Inbreeding depression in small populations of self-incompatible plants.

Authors:  S Glémin; T Bataillon; J Ronfort; A Mignot; I Olivieri
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Inbreeding depression in two populations of Arenaria uniflora (Caryophyllaceae) with contrasting mating systems.

Authors:  L Fishman
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Perspective: purging the genetic load: a review of the experimental evidence.

Authors:  Peter Crnokrak; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Anther-stigma separation is associated with inbreeding depression in Datura stramonium, a predominantly self-fertilizing annual.

Authors:  Judy L Stone; Alexander F Motten
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Patterns of inbreeding depression and architecture of the load in subdivided populations.

Authors:  Sylvain Glémin; Joëlle Ronfort; Thomas Bataillon
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Joint effects of self-fertilization and population structure on mutation load, inbreeding depression and heterosis.

Authors:  Denis Roze; François Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inbreeding depression in self-incompatible and self-compatible populations of Leavenworthia alabamica.

Authors:  J W Busch
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 10.  Sexual interference of the floral kind.

Authors:  S C H Barrett
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  1 in total

1.  Transmission advantage favors selfing allele in experimental populations of self-incompatible Witheringia solanacea (solanaceae).

Authors:  Judy L Stone; Emily J VanWyk; Jennifer R Hale
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.694

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.