Literature DB >> 21615286

Bird speech perception and vocal production: a comparison with humans.

Gabriël J L Beckers1.   

Abstract

Research into speech perception by nonhuman animals can be crucially informative in assessing whether specific perceptual phenomena in humans have evolved to decode speech, or reflect more general traits. Birds share with humans not only the capacity to use complex vocalizations for communication but also many characteristics of its underlying developmental and mechanistic processes; thus, birds are a particularly interesting group for comparative study. This review first discusses commonalities between birds and humans in perception of speech sounds. Several psychoacoustic studies have shown striking parallels in seemingly speech-specific perceptual phenomena, such as categorical perception of voice-onset-time variation, categorization of consonants that lack phonetic invariance, and compensation for coarticulation. Such findings are often regarded as evidence for the idea that the objects of human speech perception are auditory or acoustic events rather than articulations. Next, I highlight recent research on the production side of avian communication that has revealed the existence of vocal tract filtering and articulation in bird species-specific vocalization, which has traditionally been considered a hallmark of human speech production. Together, findings in birds show that many of characteristics of human speech perception are not uniquely human but also that a comparative approach to the question of what are the objects of perception--articulatory or auditory events--requires careful consideration of species-specific vocal production mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615286     DOI: 10.3378/027.083.0204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  7 in total

1.  Vocal tract articulation revisited: the case of the monk parakeet.

Authors:  Verena R Ohms; Gabriël J L Beckers; Carel ten Cate; Roderick A Suthers
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-01-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Long-term stability of vocal individuality cues in a territorial and monogamous seabird.

Authors:  Chiara Calcari; Cristina Pilenga; Luigi Baciadonna; Marco Gamba; Livio Favaro
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Evolution of Vocal Diversity through Morphological Adaptation without Vocal Learning or Complex Neural Control.

Authors:  Sarah M Garcia; Cecilia Kopuchian; Gabriel B Mindlin; Matthew J Fuxjager; Pablo L Tubaro; Franz Goller
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 4.  Revisiting vocal perception in non-human animals: a review of vowel discrimination, speaker voice recognition, and speaker normalization.

Authors:  Buddhamas Kriengwatana; Paola Escudero; Carel Ten Cate
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-01-13

5.  Hemispheric Specialization for Processing the Communicative and Emotional Content of Vocal Communication in a Social Mammal, the Domestic Pig.

Authors:  Lisette M C Leliveld; Sandra Düpjan; Armin Tuchscherer; Birger Puppe
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.558

6.  Defects in ultrasonic vocalization of cadherin-6 knockout mice.

Authors:  Ryoko Nakagawa; Eiji Matsunaga; Kazuo Okanoya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Vocal individuality cues in the African penguin (Spheniscus demersus): a source-filter theory approach.

Authors:  Livio Favaro; Marco Gamba; Chiara Alfieri; Daniela Pessani; Alan G McElligott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.