Literature DB >> 21615221

The experience of patients undergoing awake craniotomy for intracranial masses: expectations, recall, satisfaction and functional outcome.

Sankar Manchella1, Vini G Khurana, David Duke, Thomas Brussel, James French, Lisa Zuccherelli.   

Abstract

Introduction. Awake craniotomy is a well-established neurosurgical technique for lesions involving eloquent cortex, however, there is little information regarding patients' subjective experience with this type of surgery. Here we explore the expectations, recall, satisfaction and functional outcome of patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Methods. Three semi-structured interviews using closed- and open-ended questions were conducted with each of 26 consecutive patients (17 males, 9 females; aged 16-78 years) who underwent their first awake craniotomy between 2007 and 2009. Seven patients were interviewed retrospectively, 19 prospectively. Clinical data are included. Results. The following themes emerged from this study: (1) most patients demonstrated a good understanding of the rationale behind awake craniotomy; (2) patients felt the asleep-awake-asleep anaesthetic protocol used in this series was appropriate; (3) patients' confidence and preparedness for surgery was high, attributed to preparation by the surgical team. Seven of 26 (27%) patients had no recollection of being awake. Most patients had a positive anaesthetic and surgical experience, while a minority of patients reported experiencing more than slight pain (2/26; 8%) and discomfort (3/26; 12%), fear (4/26; 15%) or claustrophobia (1/26; 4%) intra-operatively. At follow-up (6 weeks post-operatively), most patients were functionally unimpaired; there was only one permanent neurological complication of surgery. We found that 24/26 (92%) patients were satisfied with their experience; one patient had no opinion and another one was unsatisfied. Five of 26 (19%) patients still reported more than slight discomfort, and 3/26 (12%) reported more than slight pain attributable to the surgery. A summary of the English peer-reviewed literature on the patient experience of awake craniotomy is also incorporated. Conclusions. This study confirms that awake craniotomy using the 'asleep-awake-asleep' anaesthetic protocol is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure associated overall with satisfactory patients' experiences and neurological outcomes.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615221     DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2011.568640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0268-8697            Impact factor:   1.596


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Anesthesiological management of awake craniotomy : Asleep-awake-asleep technique or without sedation].

Authors:  M Seemann; N Zech; B Graf; E Hansen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  Patient-reported intraoperative experiences during awake craniotomy for brain tumors: a scoping review.

Authors:  Kathleen Joy O Khu; Juan Silvestre G Pascual; Katrina Hannah D Ignacio
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Standardized reporting of adverse events and functional status from the first 5 years of awake surgery for gliomas: a population-based single-institution consecutive series.

Authors:  Margret Jensdottir; Stanislav Beniaminov; Asgeir S Jakola; Oscar Persson; Fritjof Norrelgen; Sofia Hylin; Alexander Fletcher-Sandersjöö; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Awake Craniotomy in a Child: Assessment of Eligibility with a Simulated Theatre Experience.

Authors:  Jason Labuschagne; Clover-Ann Lee; Denis Mutyaba; Tatenda Mbanje; Cynthia Sibanda
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2020-07-05

Review 5.  Awake craniotomy for supratentorial gliomas: why, when and how?

Authors:  George M Ibrahim; Mark Bernstein
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2012-09

6.  Awake craniotomy. A patient`s perspective.

Authors:  Khalid M Bajunaid; Abdulrazag M Ajlan
Journal:  Neurosciences (Riyadh)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 0.906

Review 7.  Patient Satisfaction in Surgery for Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Galal A Elsayed; Joshua Y Menendez; Borna E Tabibian; Gustavo Chagoya; Nidal B Omar; Evan Zeiger; Beverly C Walters; Harrison Walker; Barton L Guthrie
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2019-03-25

8.  The Awake Craniotomy: A Patient's Experience and A Literature Review.

Authors:  Tye Patchana; Jose A Lopez; Gohar Majeed; Alison Ho; Tony Alarcon; Natasha Plantak; Peter Vu; Javed Siddiqi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-29

9.  Indication and eligibility of glioma patients for awake surgery: A scoping review by a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Giorgio Fiore; Giorgia Abete-Fornara; Arianna Forgione; Leonardo Tariciotti; Mauro Pluderi; Stefano Borsa; Cristina Bana; Filippo Cogiamanian; Maurizio Vergari; Valeria Conte; Manuela Caroli; Marco Locatelli; Giulio Andrea Bertani
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-21       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 10.  Role of Clinical Neuropsychologists in Awake-Craniotomy.

Authors:  Vasudha H Hande; Harini Gunasekaran; Shantala Hegde; Abhinith Shashidhar; Arivazhagan Arimappamagan
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2021 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.663

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.