Literature DB >> 21615177

Low doses of pristine and oxidized single-wall carbon nanotubes affect mammalian embryonic development.

Antonio Pietroiusti1, Micol Massimiani, Ivana Fenoglio, Massimiliano Colonna, Federica Valentini, Giuseppe Palleschi, Antonella Camaioni, Andrea Magrini, Gregorio Siracusa, Antonio Bergamaschi, Alessandro Sgambato, Luisa Campagnolo.   

Abstract

Several in vitro and in vivo studies suggest local and systemic effects following exposure to carbon nanotubes. No data are available, however, on their possible embryotoxicity in mammals. In this study, we tested the effect of pristine and oxidized single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs) on the development of the mouse embryo. To this end, SWCNTs (from 10 ng to 30 μg/mouse) were administered to female mice soon after implantation (postcoital day 5.5); 10 days later, animals were sacrificed, and uteri, placentas, and fetuses examined. A high percentage of early miscarriages and fetal malformations was observed in females exposed to oxidized SWCNTs, while lower percentages were found in animals exposed to the pristine material. The lowest effective dose was 100 ng/mouse. Extensive vascular lesions and increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) were detected in placentas of malformed but not of normally developed fetuses. Increased ROS levels were likewise detected in malformed fetuses. No increased ROS production or evident morphological alterations were observed in maternal tissues. No fetal and placental abnormalities were ever observed in control animals. In parallel, SWCNT embryotoxicity was evaluated using the embryonic stem cell test (EST), a validated in vitro assay developed for predicting embryotoxicity of soluble chemical compounds, but never applied in full to nanoparticles. The EST predicted the in vivo data, identifying oxidized SWCNTs as the more toxic compound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21615177     DOI: 10.1021/nn200372g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Nano        ISSN: 1936-0851            Impact factor:   15.881


  44 in total

1.  Distribution of single wall carbon nanotubes in the Xenopus laevis embryo after microinjection.

Authors:  Brian D Holt; Joseph H Shawky; Kris Noel Dahl; Lance A Davidson; Mohammad F Islam
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 3.446

Review 2.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

3.  Uterine microvascular sensitivity to nanomaterial inhalation: An in vivo assessment.

Authors:  P A Stapleton; C R McBride; J Yi; T R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.219

4.  Use of amniotic fluid for determining pregnancies at risk of preterm birth and for studying diseases of potential environmental etiology.

Authors:  Laura A Geer; Benny F G Pycke; David M Sherer; Ovadia Abulafia; Rolf U Halden
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 5.  Toxicity of nanomaterials.

Authors:  Shahriar Sharifi; Shahed Behzadi; Sophie Laurent; M Laird Forrest; Pieter Stroeve; Morteza Mahmoudi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 6.  Health implications of engineered nanoparticles in infants and children.

Authors:  Song Tang; Mao Wang; Kaylyn E Germ; Hua-Mao Du; Wen-Jie Sun; Wei-Min Gao; Gregory D Mayer
Journal:  World J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 2.764

7.  Gestational nanomaterial exposures: microvascular implications during pregnancy, fetal development and adulthood.

Authors:  P A Stapleton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  The genotype-dependent influence of functionalized multiwalled carbon nanotubes on fetal development.

Authors:  Xinglu Huang; Fan Zhang; Xiaolian Sun; Ki-Young Choi; Gang Niu; Guofeng Zhang; Jinxia Guo; Seulki Lee; Xiaoyuan Chen
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 12.479

9.  Maternal engineered nanomaterial exposure and fetal microvascular function: does the Barker hypothesis apply?

Authors:  Phoebe A Stapleton; Valerie C Minarchick; Jinghai Yi; Kevin Engels; Carroll R McBride; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Concise review: carbon nanotechnology: perspectives in stem cell research.

Authors:  Marina V Pryzhkova
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 6.940

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.