| Literature DB >> 21614179 |
Xiaolan Chen1, Yang Lu, Shouying Du, Bing Xu, Shan Wang, Yongsong Zhai, Xiao Song, Pengyue Li.
Abstract
The objective of this work was to study the in situ and in vivo nasal absorption of paeonol. A novel single pass in situ nasal perfusion technique was applied to examine the rate and extent of nasal absorption of paeonol by rats. Various experimental conditions, such as perfusion rate, pH, osmotic pressure and drug concentration, were investigated. The in situ experiments showed that the nasal absorption of paeonol was not dependent on drug concentration, and fitted a first order process. The absorption rate constant, Ka, increased with an increase in perfusion speed. Paeonol was better absorbed in acidic solutions than in neutral or alkaline solutions. The value of Ka was higher in a hypertonic environment than under isotonic or hypotonic conditions. In vivo studies of paeonol absorption were carried out in rats and the pharmacokinetics parameters of intranasal (i.n.) and intragastric (i.g.) administration were compared with intravenous (i.v.) administration. The bioavailabilities of paeonol were 52.37% and 15.81% for i.n. and i.g, respectively, while T(max) values were 3.05 ± 1.46 min and 6.30 ± 0.70 min. MRT (Mean Residence Time) were 23.19 ± 6.46 min, 41.49 ± 2.96 min and 23.09 ± 5.88 min for i.n., i.g. and i.v. methods, respectively. The results demonstrate that paeonol could be absorbed promptly and thoroughly by i.n. administration in rats.Entities:
Keywords: in situ; nasal absorption; paeonol; pharmacokinetics; single pass perfusion technique
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2010 PMID: 21614179 PMCID: PMC3100845 DOI: 10.3390/ijms11124882
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Ka of paeonol nasal absorption with different perfusion speeds (n = 5, mean ± S.D.)
| 0.2 | 88.59 ± 6.47 |
| 0.3 | 138.57 ± 9.97[ |
| 0.4 | 142.66 ± 11.95[ |
P < 0.01 vs. 0.2.
Ka of paeonol nasal absorption with different osmotic pressures (n = 5, mean ± S.D.).
| Pure Water | 91.62 ± 9.26 |
| NS | 88.59 ± 6.47 |
| 1.8% NaCl | 109.47 ± 9.54[ |
P < 0.01 vs. 0.9% NaCl.
Ka of paeonol nasal absorption with different pH (n = 5, mean ± S.D.).
| 4.01 | 98.97 ± 11.68[ |
| 6.45 | 88.59 ± 6.47 |
| 10.0 | 81.87 ± 17.91 |
P < 0.01 vs. pH 6.45
Ka of paeonol nasal absorption with different drug concentrations (n = 5, mean ± S.D.).
| 50 | 88.91 ± 3.66 |
| 100 | 88.59 ± 6.47 |
| 200 | 93.76 ± 4.88 |
Figure 1.Concentration of paeonol in plasma (n = 6, mean ± S.D.) following a single i.v. (♦), i.n. (▪), or i.g. (▴) administration; calculated dosage of 4 mg·kg−1 of paeonol in rats.
Main pharmacokinetic parameters of plasma after i.v. and i.n. and i.g. administration of paeonol in rats (n = 5, mean ± S.D.).
| ka | Min−1 | - | 0.73 ± 0.19 | 0. 43 ± 0.34 |
| A | μg·mL−1 | 5.51 ± 1.84 | 6.57 ± 1.68 | 6.83 ± 3.86 |
| α | 0.14 ± 0.12 | 0.29 ± 0.14 | 0. 15 ± 0.03 | |
| B | μg·mL−1 | 4.04 ± 1.75 | 1.17 ± 0.48 | 2.25 ± 0.66 |
| β | 0.09 ± 0.11 | 0.037 ± 0.014 | 0.018 ± 0.002 | |
| AUC | μg/mL·min | 111.62 ± 14.45 | 58.45 ± 12.88 | 17.65 ± 3.44 |
| MRT | min | 23.09 ± 5.88 | 23.19 ± 6.46 | 41.49 ± 2.96 |
| Cmax | μg·mL−1 | 8.96 ± 0.84 | 4.50 ± 1.53 | 0.49 ± 0.10 |
| Tmax | min | - | 3.05 ± 1.46 | 6.29 ± 0.70 |
| Kel | min−1 | 0.08 ± 0.015 | 0.14 ± 0.044 | 0.053 ± 0.017 |
| K12 | min−1 | 0.065 ± 0.042 | 0.11 ± 0.078 | 0.057 ± 0.025 |
| K21 | min−1 | 0.087 ± 0.058 | 0.077 ± 0.035 | 0.05 ± 0.02 |
| T1/2 Ka | min | - | 0.87 ± 0.57 | 2.44 ± 1.33 |
| T1/2α | min | 8.99 ± 6.99 | 3.16 ± 2.06 | 4.97 ± 1.12 |
| T1/2β | min | 21.28 ± 20.41 | 23.769 ± 16.86 | 39.026 ± 5.10 |
P < 0.05 vs. i.v.,
P < 0.01 vs. i.v.
Figure 2.Diagram of in situ nasal single pass perfusion.