Literature DB >> 21613620

Quality versus quantity: assessing individual research performance.

José-Alain Sahel1.   

Abstract

Evaluating individual research performance is a complex task that ideally examines productivity, scientific impact, and research quality--a task that metrics alone have been unable to achieve. In January 2011, the French Academy of Sciences published a report on current bibliometric (citation metric) methods for evaluating individual researchers, as well as recommendations for the integration of quality assessment. Here, I draw on key issues raised by this report and comment on the suggestions for improving existing research evaluation practices.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21613620      PMCID: PMC3338409          DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Transl Med        ISSN: 1946-6234            Impact factor:   17.956


  7 in total

1.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

Authors:  E GARFIELD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Metrics: Do metrics matter?

Authors:  Alison Abbott; David Cyranoski; Nicola Jones; Brendan Maher; Quirin Schiermeier; Richard Van Noorden
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Authors:  J E Hirsch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Eleni I Pitsouni; George A Malietzis; Georgios Pappas
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals.

Authors:  Abhaya V Kulkarni; Brittany Aziz; Iffat Shams; Jason W Busse
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-09-09       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

Review 7.  The use of bibliometric indicators to help peer-review assessment.

Authors:  Nicole Haeffner-Cavaillon; Claude Graillot-Gak
Journal:  Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz)       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 4.291

  7 in total
  15 in total

1.  How good is research really? Measuring the citation impact of publications with percentiles increases correct assessments and fair comparisons.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  Comments to the response of Rodríguez-Navarro.

Authors:  Lutz Bornmann; Werner Marx
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 8.807

3.  From free to free market: cost recovery in federally funded clinical research.

Authors:  Margaret G McCammon; Thomas T Fogg; Lynda Jacobsen; John Roache; Royce Sampson; Cynthia L Bower
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 17.956

4.  The Third French Alzheimer Plan: analysis of the influence of a national public health initiative on scientific research productivity and impact.

Authors:  Nicole Haeffner-Cavaillon; Patrick Devos; Sylvie Ledoux; Joël Ménard
Journal:  Alzheimers Res Ther       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 6.982

5.  Towards an open science publishing platform.

Authors:  Vitek Tracz; Rebecca Lawrence
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2016-02-03

6.  Researchers' Individual Publication Rate Has Not Increased in a Century.

Authors:  Daniele Fanelli; Vincent Larivière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Impact of Health Research Systems on Under-5 Mortality Rate: A Trend Analysis.

Authors:  Bahareh Yazdizadeh; Mahboubeh Parsaeian; Reza Majdzadeh; Sima Nikooee
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-07-01

8.  A novel bibliometric index with a simple geometric interpretation.

Authors:  Trevor Fenner; Martyn Harris; Mark Levene; Judit Bar-Ilan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comprehensive Researcher Achievement Model (CRAM): a framework for measuring researcher achievement, impact and influence derived from a systematic literature review of metrics and models.

Authors:  Jeffrey Braithwaite; Jessica Herkes; Kate Churruca; Janet C Long; Chiara Pomare; Claire Boyling; Mia Bierbaum; Robyn Clay-Williams; Frances Rapport; Patti Shih; Anne Hogden; Louise A Ellis; Kristiana Ludlow; Elizabeth Austin; Rebecca Seah; Elise McPherson; Peter D Hibbert; Johanna Westbrook
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-30       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Games academics play and their consequences: how authorship, h-index and journal impact factors are shaping the future of academia.

Authors:  Colin A Chapman; Júlio César Bicca-Marques; Sébastien Calvignac-Spencer; Pengfei Fan; Peter J Fashing; Jan Gogarten; Songtao Guo; Claire A Hemingway; Fabian Leendertz; Baoguo Li; Ikki Matsuda; Rong Hou; Juan Carlos Serio-Silva; Nils Chr Stenseth
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.