Literature DB >> 21612727

Psychosocial oncology services in New South Wales.

Nicole M Rankin1, Jennifer A Barron, Lisbeth G Lane, Catherine A Mason, Sue Sinclair, James F Bishop.   

Abstract

There is limited published evidence about how psychosocial services should be organised or routinely integrated into cancer services to ensure that cancer patients receive appropriate psychological, social and emotional support during periods of diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. This paper reports on a survey of 26 oncology services in New South Wales, Australia, to examine the current provision of psychosocial oncology services. The aim of the study was to gather baseline data and information about the provision of services and to identify significant challenges associated with the development and implementation of psychosocial oncology services. A total of 42% of staff at psycho-oncology services reported they could provide adequate psycho-oncology services, but 58% of sites said they could provide either only limited (27%) or very limited (31%) services. We found that services frequently identified challenges such as insufficient funding to employ skilled staff to provide psychosocial interventions, inadequate data to demonstrate the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions and, at times, lack of space to allow privacy for patient consultations. Future needs identified were strategic planning of psychosocial oncology services as part of broader cancer service plans, leadership of psychosocial oncology services, cohesive teams using agreed patient pathways or tools and integration into multi-disciplinary cancer teams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612727     DOI: 10.1071/AH08730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  5 in total

1.  How does the Distress Thermometer compare to the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for detecting possible cases of psychological morbidity among cancer survivors?

Authors:  Allison Boyes; Catherine D'Este; Mariko Carey; Christophe Lecathelinais; Afaf Girgis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  A tiered multidisciplinary approach to the psychosocial care of adult cancer patients integrated into routine care: the PROMPT study (a cluster-randomised controlled trial).

Authors:  Jane Turner; Brian Kelly; David Clarke; Patsy Yates; Sanchia Aranda; Damien Jolley; Andrew Forbes; Suzanne Chambers; Maryanne Hargraves; Lisa Mackenzie
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Everybody wants it done but nobody wants to do it: an exploration of the barrier and enablers of critical components towards creating a clinical pathway for anxiety and depression in cancer.

Authors:  Nicole M Rankin; Phyllis N Butow; Thida Thein; Tracy Robinson; Joanne M Shaw; Melanie A Price; Kerrie Clover; Tim Shaw; Peter Grimison
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope.

Authors:  Suzanne K Chambers; Lee Ritterband; Frances Thorndike; Lisa Nielsen; Joanne F Aitken; Samantha Clutton; Paul Scuffham; Philippa Youl; Bronwyn Morris; Peter Baade; Jeffrey Dunn
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  What is multidisciplinary cancer care like in practice? a protocol for a mixed-method study to characterise ambulatory oncology services in the Australian public sector.

Authors:  Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig; Gaston Arnolda; Yvonne Tran; Mia Bierbaum; Klay Lamprell; Geoffrey P Delaney; Winston Liauw; Renuka Chittajallu; Teresa Winata; Robyn L Ward; David C Currow; Ian Olver; Jonathan Karnon; Johanna Westbrook; Jeffrey Braithwaite
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.