Literature DB >> 21612385

No deaths associated with patient refusal of transport after naloxone-reversed opioid overdose.

David A Wampler1, D Kimberley Molina, John McManus, Philip Laws, Craig A Manifold.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Naloxone is widely used in the treatment and reversal of opioid overdose. Most emergency medical services (EMS) systems administer naloxone by standing order, and titrate only to reverse respiratory depression without fully reversing sedation. Some EMS systems routinely administer sufficient naloxone to fully reverse the effects of opioid overdose. Frequently patients refuse further medical evaluation or intervention, including transport.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of this practice and determine whether increased mortality is associated with full reversal of opioids. As a component of a comprehensive quality assurance initiative, we assessed mortality during the 48 hours after patients received naloxone to reverse opioid overdose followed by patient-initiated refusal of transportation.
METHODS: The setting was a large urban fire-based EMS system. Investigators provided the Bexar County Medical Examiner's Office (MEO) with a list of patients who were treated by the San Antonio Fire Department with naloxone, and not transported. Inclusion criteria were administration of naloxone and patient-initiated refusal. Patient dispositions also included aid only, referral to the MEO, or referral to law enforcement. The list was then compared with the MEO database. A chart review was completed on all patients treated and subsequently presented to the MEO within two days. A secondary time period of 30 days was also assessed.
RESULTS: The list identified 592 patients treated with naloxone and not transported to the emergency department. Five-hundred fifty-two patients received naloxone and refused transport or were not transported. The remaining 40 patients all presented to EMS in cardiac arrest, naloxone was administered during the course of resuscitation, and subsequent efforts were terminated in the field. None of the patients receiving naloxone with a subsequent patient-initiated refusal were examined at the MEO within the two-day end point. The 30-day assessment revealed that nine individuals were treated with naloxone and subsequently died, but the shortest time interval between date of service and date of death was four days.
CONCLUSION: The primary outcome was that no patients who were treated with naloxone for opioid overdose and then refused care were examined by the MEO within a 48-hour time frame.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21612385     DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2011.569854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care        ISSN: 1090-3127            Impact factor:   3.077


  18 in total

Review 1.  Naloxone dosage for opioid reversal: current evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  Rachael Rzasa Lynn; J L Galinkin
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-13

2.  Disparity in naloxone administration by emergency medical service providers and the burden of drug overdose in US rural communities.

Authors:  Mark Faul; Michael W Dailey; David E Sugerman; Scott M Sasser; Benjamin Levy; Len J Paulozzi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Expanding access to naloxone in the United States.

Authors:  Suzanne Doyon; Steven E Aks; Scott Schaeffer
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Validation of Criteria to Guide Prehospital Naloxone Administration for Drug-Related Altered Mental Status.

Authors:  Matt S Friedman; Alex F Manini
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-04-15

5.  Multiple Naloxone Administrations Among Emergency Medical Service Providers is Increasing.

Authors:  Mark Faul; Peter Lurie; Jeremiah M Kinsman; Michael W Dailey; Charmaine Crabaugh; Scott M Sasser
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Identification of Non-Fatal Opioid Overdose Cases Using 9-1-1 Computer Assisted Dispatch and Prehospital Patient Clinical Record Variables.

Authors:  Olufemi Ajumobi; Silvia R Verdugo; Brian Labus; Patrick Reuther; Bradford Lee; Brandon Koch; Peter J Davidson; Karla D Wagner
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 2.686

7.  Findings from the recovery initiation and management after overdose (RIMO) pilot study experiment.

Authors:  Christy K Scott; Michael L Dennis; Christine E Grella; Lisa Nicholson; Jamie Sumpter; Rachel Kurz; Rod Funk
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2019-08-07

8.  EMS runs for suspected opioid overdose: implications for surveillance and prevention.

Authors:  Amy Knowlton; Brian W Weir; Frank Hazzard; Yngvild Olsen; Junette McWilliams; Julie Fields; Wade Gaasch
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Pitfalls of intranasal naloxone.

Authors:  Matthew Zuckerman; Stacy N Weisberg; Edward W Boyer
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  One year mortality of patients treated with naloxone for opioid overdose by emergency medical services.

Authors:  Scott G Weiner; Olesya Baker; Dana Bernson; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.