BACKGROUND: Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a devastating neurological complication of cancer that needs to be diagnosed in the early stages of disease. Polymerase chain reaction detection of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which are predictive markers for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in lung cancer, might be important to diagnose and to treat NM in patients with lung cancer. In this study, we attempted to detect EGFR mutations in CSF and to compare EGFR status between CSF and primary or metastatic lesions in patients with lung adenocarcinoma suspected of NM. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with lung adenocarcinoma suspected of having NM underwent lumbar puncture. EGFR status of CSF was analyzed by direct DNA sequencing. EGFR mutations of primary or metastatic lesions (lymph nodes and bones) were analyzed in 20 cases. RESULTS: EGFR mutations were detected in CSF of 13 (45%) of 29 patients. In 5 (31%) of 16 patients with negative CSF cytology, EGFR mutations were detected. In four patients, EGFR mutations were shown in CSF, but not in primary or metastatic lesions. Conversely, in two patients, EGFR mutations were shown in primary or metastatic lesions, but not in CSF despite positive CSF cytology. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR mutations, suggesting the existence of malignant cells, were detected in CSF, even in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with negative cytological results. EGFR mutations in CSF do not always reflect the same status as in primary or metastatic lesions.
BACKGROUND:Neoplastic meningitis (NM) is a devastating neurological complication of cancer that needs to be diagnosed in the early stages of disease. Polymerase chain reaction detection of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), which are predictive markers for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy in lung cancer, might be important to diagnose and to treat NM in patients with lung cancer. In this study, we attempted to detect EGFR mutations in CSF and to compare EGFR status between CSF and primary or metastatic lesions in patients with lung adenocarcinoma suspected of NM. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with lung adenocarcinoma suspected of having NM underwent lumbar puncture. EGFR status of CSF was analyzed by direct DNA sequencing. EGFR mutations of primary or metastatic lesions (lymph nodes and bones) were analyzed in 20 cases. RESULTS:EGFR mutations were detected in CSF of 13 (45%) of 29 patients. In 5 (31%) of 16 patients with negative CSF cytology, EGFR mutations were detected. In four patients, EGFR mutations were shown in CSF, but not in primary or metastatic lesions. Conversely, in two patients, EGFR mutations were shown in primary or metastatic lesions, but not in CSF despite positive CSF cytology. CONCLUSIONS:EGFR mutations, suggesting the existence of malignant cells, were detected in CSF, even in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with negative cytological results. EGFR mutations in CSF do not always reflect the same status as in primary or metastatic lesions.
Authors: Amanda Fitzpatrick; Marjan Iravani; Adam Mills; Lucy Childs; Thanussuyah Alaguthurai; Angela Clifford; Isaac Garcia-Murillas; Steven Van Laere; Luc Dirix; Mark Harries; Alicia Okines; Nicholas C Turner; Syed Haider; Andrew N J Tutt; Clare M Isacke Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2022-03-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Tejus A Bale; Soo-Ryum Yang; James P Solomon; Khedoudja Nafa; Sumit Middha; Jacklyn Casanova; Justyna Sadowska; Anna Skakodub; Hamza Ahmad; Helena A Yu; Greg J Riely; Mark G Kris; Sarat Chandarlapaty; Marc K Rosenblum; Igor Gavrilovic; Matthias A Karajannis; Elena Pentsova; Alexandra Miller; Adrienne Boire; Ingo Mellinghoff; Michael F Berger; Ahmet Zehir; Marc Ladanyi; Ryma Benayed; Maria E Arcila Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2021-03-27 Impact factor: 5.341
Authors: Elena I Pentsova; Ronak H Shah; Jiabin Tang; Adrienne Boire; Daoqi You; Samuel Briggs; Antonio Omuro; Xuling Lin; Martin Fleisher; Christian Grommes; Katherine S Panageas; Fanli Meng; S Duygu Selcuklu; Shahiba Ogilvie; Natalie Distefano; Larisa Shagabayeva; Marc Rosenblum; Lisa M DeAngelis; Agnes Viale; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Michael F Berger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Tina Y Huang; Andrea Piunti; Rishi R Lulla; Jin Qi; Craig M Horbinski; Tadanori Tomita; C David James; Ali Shilatifard; Amanda M Saratsis Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun Date: 2017-04-17 Impact factor: 7.801
Authors: M Itakura; Y Terashima; M Shingyoji; S Yokoi; M Ohira; H Kageyama; Y Matui; Y Yoshida; H Ashinuma; Y Moriya; H Tamura; K Harigaya; K Matushima; T Iizasa; A Nakagawara; H Kimura Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-08-06 Impact factor: 7.640