Literature DB >> 34921020

Assessing CSF ctDNA to Improve Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Monitoring in Breast Cancer Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

Amanda Fitzpatrick1, Marjan Iravani1, Adam Mills1, Lucy Childs2, Thanussuyah Alaguthurai3, Angela Clifford3, Isaac Garcia-Murillas1, Steven Van Laere4, Luc Dirix5, Mark Harries6, Alicia Okines7, Nicholas C Turner1,7, Syed Haider1, Andrew N J Tutt1,3, Clare M Isacke1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology is the gold standard diagnostic test for breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis (BCLM), but has impaired sensitivity, often necessitating repeated lumbar puncture to confirm or refute diagnosis. Further, there is no quantitative response tool to assess response or progression during BCLM treatment. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Facing the challenge of working with small-volume samples and the lack of common recurrent mutations in breast cancers, cell-free DNA was extracted from the CSF and plasma of patients undergoing investigation for BCLM (n = 30). ctDNA fraction was assessed by ultra-low-pass whole genome sequencing (ulpWGS), which does not require prior tumor sequencing.
RESULTS: In this proof-of-concept study, ctDNA was detected (fraction ≥0.10) in the CSF of all 24 patients with BCLM+ (median ctDNA fraction, 0.57), regardless of negative cytology or borderline MRI imaging, whereas CSF ctDNA was not detected in the six patients with BCLM- (median ctDNA fraction 0.03, P < 0.0001). Plasma ctDNA was only detected in patients with extracranial disease progression or who had previously received whole brain radiotherapy. ctDNA fraction was highly concordant with mutant allele fraction measured by tumor mutation-specific ddPCR assays (r = 0.852; P < 0.0001). During intrathecal treatment, serial monitoring (n = 12 patients) showed that suppression of CSF ctDNA fraction was associated with longer BCLM survival (P = 0.034), and rising ctDNA fraction was detectable up to 12 weeks before clinical progression.
CONCLUSIONS: Measuring ctDNA fraction by ulpWGS is a quantitative marker demonstrating potential for timely and accurate BCLM diagnosis and therapy response monitoring, with the ultimate aim to improve management of this poor-prognosis patient group. ©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34921020      PMCID: PMC7612501          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-3017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  44 in total

1.  The relevance of intraventricular chemotherapy for leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer: a randomised study.

Authors:  W Boogerd; M J van den Bent; P J Koehler; J J Heimans; J J van der Sande; N K Aaronson; A A M Hart; J Benraadt; Ch J Vecht
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 2.  CSF, blood-brain barrier, and brain drug delivery.

Authors:  William M Pardridge
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 6.648

3.  Diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid EGFR mutation analysis for leptomeningeal metastasis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring an active EGFR mutation following gefitinib therapy failure.

Authors:  Shinichi Sasaki; Yasuko Yoshioka; Ryo Ko; Yoko Katsura; Yukiko Namba; Takehito Shukuya; Kenji Kido; Shinichiro Iwakami; Shigeru Tominaga; Kazuhisa Takahashi
Journal:  Respir Investig       Date:  2015-08-30

Review 4.  Biomarker validation and testing.

Authors:  Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 6.603

5.  Brain tumor mutations detected in cerebral spinal fluid.

Authors:  Wenying Pan; Wei Gu; Seema Nagpal; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Stephen R Quake
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Mingyao Li; Hakon Hakonarson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Detection of Aneuploidy in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Breast Cancer Can Improve Diagnosis of Leptomeningeal Metastases.

Authors:  Lindsay Angus; Teoman Deger; Agnes Jager; John W M Martens; Vanja de Weerd; Irene van Heuvel; Martin J van den Bent; Peter A E Sillevis Smitt; Johan M Kros; Eric M J Bindels; Ellen Heitzer; Stefan Sleijfer; Joost L M Jongen; Saskia M Wilting
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Neoplastic meningitis: How MRI and CSF cytology are influenced by CSF cell count and tumor type.

Authors:  P Prömmel; S Pilgram-Pastor; H Sitter; J-H Buhk; H Strik
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2013-12-19

9.  Detection of cell-free DNA fragmentation and copy number alterations in cerebrospinal fluid from glioma patients.

Authors:  Florent Mouliere; Richard Mair; Dineika Chandrananda; Francesco Marass; Christopher G Smith; Jing Su; James Morris; Colin Watts; Kevin M Brindle; Nitzan Rosenfeld
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 12.137

10.  Detection of Leptomeningeal Disease Using Cell-Free DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Michael D White; Robert H Klein; Brian Shaw; Albert Kim; Megha Subramanian; Joana L Mora; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Deepika Nagabhushan; Aarushi Jain; Mohini Singh; Benjamin M Kuter; Naema Nayyar; Mia S Bertalan; Jackson H Stocking; Samuel C Markson; Matthew Lastrapes; Christopher Alvarez-Breckenridge; Daniel P Cahill; Gregory Gydush; Justin Rhoades; Denisse Rotem; Viktor A Adalsteinsson; Maura Mahar; Alexander Kaplan; Kevin Oh; Ryan J Sullivan; Elizabeth Gerstner; Scott L Carter; Priscilla K Brastianos
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-08-02
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Towards updated understanding of brain metastasis.

Authors:  Shuncong Wang; Yuanbo Feng; Lei Chen; Jie Yu; Chantal Van Ongeval; Guy Bormans; Yue Li; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 5.942

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.